IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3189-d1627591.html

Digital Twins Facing the Complexity of the City: Some Critical Remarks

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Rosaria Stufano Melone

    (DICATECh, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy
    Laboratory for Applied Ontology (LOA), ISTC-CNR, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Stefano Borgo

    (Laboratory for Applied Ontology (LOA), ISTC-CNR, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Domenico Camarda

    (DICATECh, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy
    Laboratory for Applied Ontology (LOA), ISTC-CNR, 38123 Trento, Italy)

Abstract

The concept of a digital twin (DT), rooted in mid-20th-century ideas, has recently gained significant traction even outside software simulation and engineering modeling. The recent advancements in computational power and the development of model integration methodologies have enabled the creation of virtual replicas of complex physical objects. The success of DTs in engineering has also pushed for the exploration of their use in other domains, especially where complex systems are at stake. One of these cases, which is the focus of this paper, is the modeling of cities and the way they are transformed via technologies into so-called smart cities. In these systems, the huge amount of data that are made accessible and constantly updated via sensor networks suggests that one can use DTs dedicated to the urban scenario as data-driven decision-making devices. However, the concept of a DT was not developed for socio-technical systems and requires careful analysis when applied to urban scenarios. While technologies and information systems have become integrated into city management, this has not reduced the complexity of the city. Relying only on sensory data for city modeling and management seems pretentious since detectable data (what is made accessible via sensor networks) do not seem suitable to inform on all important aspects of the city. Urban DTs hold promise, yet their development necessitates careful consideration of both opportunities and limitations. For this goal, it can be helpful to exploit an ontological analysis due to its neutral and systematic approach and to look at a city as a system of intertwined relationships across its components, such as places, agents, and knowledge. The variety of interactions that the components manifest highlights aspects of the city that the type of data we can collect today leaves unexplored. The paper presents a preliminary example of this issue by studying cases of city squares. The final part of this paper is a call to analyze DTs’ potential role in urban contexts and become aware of the intrinsic limitations of the data they rely upon.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Rosaria Stufano Melone & Stefano Borgo & Domenico Camarda, 2025. "Digital Twins Facing the Complexity of the City: Some Critical Remarks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3189-:d:1627591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3189/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3189/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Gottwald & Jana Brenner & Christian Albert & Ron Janssen, 2021. "Integrating sense of place into participatory landscape planning: merging mapping surveys and geodesign workshops," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(8), pages 1041-1056, November.
    2. Lindsay Blair Howe, 2021. "Thinking through people: The potential of volunteered geographic information for mobility and urban studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(14), pages 3009-3028, November.
    3. David Sweeting & Jessica de Alba-Ulloa & Mario Pansera & Alex Marsh, 2022. "Easier said than done? Involving citizens in the smart city," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(6), pages 1365-1381, September.
    4. Fabian Dembski & Uwe Wössner & Mike Letzgus & Michael Ruddat & Claudia Yamu, 2020. "Urban Digital Twins for Smart Cities and Citizens: The Case Study of Herrenberg, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Herbert A. Simon, 1955. "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(1), pages 99-118.
    6. Ehab Shahat & Chang T. Hyun & Chunho Yeom, 2021. "City Digital Twin Potentials: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Oleg Missikoff, 2024. "Local Digital Twin Ecosystems: A Human-Centric Approach," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Alessio Maria Braccini & Francesca Ricciardi & Francesco Virili (ed.), Digital (Eco) Systems and Societal Challenges, pages 131-149, Springer.
    8. Herbert A. Simon, 1991. "Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 125-134, February.
    9. Bipashyee Ghosh & Saurabh Arora, 2022. "Smart as (un)democratic? The making of a smart city imaginary in Kolkata, India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 318-339, February.
    10. Stefano Borgo & Claudio Masolo, 2009. "Foundational Choices in DOLCE," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Steffen Staab & Rudi Studer (ed.), Handbook on Ontologies, pages 361-381, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe Pernagallo & Benedetto Torrisi, 2020. "A theory of information overload applied to perfectly efficient financial markets," Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 223-236, October.
    2. Güth, Werner, 2021. "(Un)bounded rationality of decision deliberation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 364-372.
    3. Michelle Mongo & Nabyla Daidj, 2026. "Digital twin: a driver of sustainable smart cities? Evidence from a bibliometric analysis," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 28(1), pages 351-379, January.
    4. Pablo Garces-Velastegui, 2023. "Towards a behavioural capability approach: the contribution of behavioural economics to Amartya Sen’s framework," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 70(1), pages 101-120, March.
    5. Miles M Yang & Feifei Yang & Tingru Cui & Ying-Chu Cheng, 2019. "Analysing the dynamics of mental models using causal loop diagrams," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(3), pages 495-512, August.
    6. Thomas Holtfort, 2019. "From standard to evolutionary finance: a literature survey," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 207-232, June.
    7. Brunswicker, Sabine & Schecter, Aaron, 2019. "Coherence or flexibility? The paradox of change for developers’ digital innovation trajectory on open platforms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    8. Rim Lassoued & Hayley Hesseln & Peter W. B. Phillips & Stuart J. Smyth, 2020. "Effects of information presentation on regulatory decisions for products of biotechnology," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(3), pages 151-175, November.
    9. Casey R. Corrado & Suzanne M. DeLong & Emily G. Holt & Edward Y. Hua & Andreas Tolk, 2022. "Combining Green Metrics and Digital Twins for Sustainability Planning and Governance of Smart Buildings and Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Daniele SCHILIRÒ, 2013. "Bounded Rationality: Psychology, Economics And The Financial Crises," Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, ASERS Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 97-108.
    11. Douglas E. Thomas & Lorraine Eden & Michael A. Hitt & Stewart R. Miller, 2007. "Experience of emerging market firms: The role of cognitive bias in developed market entry and survival," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 845-867, December.
    12. Mills, Stuart & Spencer, David A., 2025. "Efficient inefficiency: organisational challenges of realising economic gains from AI," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126626, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Wendy L Currie & Jonathan J J M Seddon & Ben van Vliet, 2022. "From decision optimization to satisficing: Regulation of automated trading in the US financial markets," Post-Print hal-03839100, HAL.
    14. Ilgaz Arikan & Ipek Koparan & Asli M Arikan & Oded Shenkar, 2022. "Dynamic capabilities and internationalization of authentic firms: Role of heritage assets, administrative heritage, and signature processes," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(4), pages 601-635, June.
    15. Léo Leplat & Claudia López-Alfaro & Arne Styve & Ricardo da Silva Torres, 2025. "NorDark-DT: A digital twin for urban lighting infrastructure planning and analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(3), pages 667-688, March.
    16. Sadek, Biland, 2024. "Components and Strategic Routes of Corporate Transformations," MPRA Paper 120332, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 26 Feb 2024.
    17. Antretter, Torben & Sirén, Charlotta & Grichnik, Dietmar & Wincent, Joakim, 2020. "Should business angels diversify their investment portfolios to achieve higher performance? The role of knowledge access through co-investment networks," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(5).
    18. Batel Yossef Ravid & Meirav Aharon-Gutman, 2023. "The Social Digital Twin:The Social Turn in the Field of Smart CitiesÂ," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(6), pages 1455-1470, July.
    19. Schilirò, Daniele, 2011. "Economics and psychology.Perfect rationality versus bounded rationality," MPRA Paper 34292, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Lorenzo Corno & Giovanni Dosi & Luigi Marengo, 2025. "Behaviours and Learning in Complex Evolving Economies," GREDEG Working Papers 2025-14, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3189-:d:1627591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.