IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3080-d1624680.html

Bridging Sustainable Development: The Nexus of Business Safety, Health Management, and Corporate Social Sustainability—Do Affective Commitment and Emotional Intelligence Mediate?

Author

Listed:
  • Panteha Farmanesh

    (Faculty of Communication, Arkin University of Creative Arts & Design, 99300 Kyrenia, Northern Cyprus, Turkey)

  • Chafic Saliba

    (Department of Business, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Kaslik, Jounieh P.O. Box 446, Lebanon)

  • Seyed Alireza Athari

    (Department of Business, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Kaslik, Jounieh P.O. Box 446, Lebanon
    Advanced Research Centre, European University of Lefke, 99010 Lefke, Northern Cyprus, Turkey)

  • Dina Naaman

    (Department of Business Administration, Cyprus International University, 99010 Nicosia, Northern Cyprus, Turkey)

  • Souha Hanna Al Geitany

    (Department of Business, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Kaslik, Jounieh P.O. Box 446, Lebanon)

  • Jehad Omar Abualrob

    (Department of Health Quality and Occupational Health and Safety, Modern University College, Ramallah P.O. Box 1069, Palestine)

Abstract

Accidents and injuries at work are unavoidable. Promoting corporate sustainability requires strategies concerning employees’ health and a safe work environment in light of social, environmental, and economic development. The purpose of this paper is to examine the significant association between Occupational Safety and Health Management (OSHM) and Corporate Sustainability (CS) in the context of West Bank industries in Palestine, bolstering the mediating role of Affective Commitment (AC) and Emotional Intelligence (EI). We sampled 126 executive and knowledgeable Palestinian employees in the region using a questionnaire for data collection. We used Smart PLS 4 to evaluate the study model and hypotheses. This study bridges the gap by investigating the relationship of the study constructs in Palestinian industries in the West Bank. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating how OSH practices can improve CS by encouraging social engagement, economic performance, and environmental conservation. The study’s findings are consistent with the Sustainable Development Goals, especially SDG 3, which establishes policies to enhance public health and improve well-being for people at any age, and SDG 8, which advocates for sustainable progress in the economy, prolific employment, and decent job for everyone. The findings highlight how important it is for West Bank businesses to implement training in emotional intelligence and encourage affective commitment to improving safety and health strategies, ultimately resulting in increased corporate sustainability by considering social and environmental policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Panteha Farmanesh & Chafic Saliba & Seyed Alireza Athari & Dina Naaman & Souha Hanna Al Geitany & Jehad Omar Abualrob, 2025. "Bridging Sustainable Development: The Nexus of Business Safety, Health Management, and Corporate Social Sustainability—Do Affective Commitment and Emotional Intelligence Mediate?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3080-:d:1624680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3080/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3080/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sotirios Kavouras & Ioannis Vardopoulos & Roido Mitoula & Antonis A. Zorpas & Panagiotis Kaldis, 2022. "Occupational Health and Safety Scope Significance in Achieving Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Anja Schaefer, 2004. "Corporate sustainability – integrating environmental and social concerns?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 179-187, December.
    3. Yujie Wang & Hong Chen & Ruyin Long & Shiyan Jiang & Bei Liu, 2022. "Evaluation of Occupational Health and Safety Management of Listed Companies in China’s Energy Industry Based on the Combined Weight-Cloud Model: From the Perspective of FPE Information Disclosure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Maxwell Fordjour Antwi-Afari & Faris Elghaish & Ahmad M. A. Zamil & Mohammad Alhusban & Thikryat Jibril Obied Qaralleh, 2023. "Benefits of Implementing Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems for the Sustainable Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-35, August.
    5. Thomas Dyllick & Kai Hockerts, 2002. "Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 130-141, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Feng & Kongling Liu & Qinge Wang, 2025. "Aligning with SDGs in Construction: The Foreman as a Key Lever for Reducing Worker Risk-Taking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarzyna Liczmańska-Kopcewicz & Paula Pypłacz & Agnieszka Wiśniewska, 2020. "Resonance of Investments in Renewable Energy Sources in Industrial Enterprises in the Food Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Fatih Akbaş & Ferudun Kaya, 2022. "Investigation of Financial Performance Indicators Affecting Corporate Sustainability of Participation Banks," Journal of Finance Letters (Maliye ve Finans Yazıları), Maliye ve Finans Yazıları Yayıncılık Ltd. Şti., vol. 37(117), pages 159-176, April.
    3. Maria Björklund & Helena Forslund, 2019. "Challenges Addressed by Swedish Third-Party Logistics Providers Conducting Sustainable Logistics Business Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Merriam Haffar & Cory Searcy, 2018. "Target‐setting for ecological resilience: Are companies setting environmental sustainability targets in line with planetary thresholds?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1079-1092, November.
    5. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    6. Florentina Moisescu, 2025. "Sustainability and Financial Performance: Exploring the Interconnections Through the Accounting Perspective in Romania," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 250-257.
    7. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    8. Bert Scholtens & Feng‐Ching Kang, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: Evidence from Asian Economies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 95-112, March.
    9. Fabien Martinez, 2014. "Corporate strategy and the environment: towards a four-dimensional compatibility model for fostering green management decisions," Post-Print hal-02887618, HAL.
    10. Veronica Devenin & Constanza Bianchi, 2018. "Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 866-879, September.
    11. Tommaso Elli & Alessandra Spagnoli & Valeria Maria Iannilli, 2024. "Mapping Service-Based Retailing to Improve Sustainability Practices in the Fashion Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Nurisyal Muhamad & Sofiah Md Auzair & Amizawati Mohd Amir & Md Daud Ismail, 2016. "Measuring Sustainability Performance Measurement System," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 3(12), pages 182-199, JUNE.
    13. Frank Fogarty & Amy Villamagna & Allen Whitley & Kelly Pippins, 2013. "The Capacity to Endure: Following Nature’s Lead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Caetani, Alberto Pavlick & Ferreira, Luciano & Borenstein, Denis, 2016. "Development of an integrated decision-making method for an oil refinery restructuring in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 197-210.
    15. Justyna Patalas-Maliszewska & Hanna Łosyk, 2020. "An Approach to Assessing Sustainability in the Development of a Manufacturing Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    16. Yanfang Zhang & Mushang Lee, 2019. "A Hybrid Model for Addressing the Relationship between Financial Performance and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Galbreath, Jeremy, 2017. "Drivers Of Environmental Sustainability In Wine Firms: The Role And Effect Of Women In Leadership," Working Papers 253851, American Association of Wine Economists.
    18. Yong Liu & Bing-ting Quan & Jiao Li & Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest, 2018. "A Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism with Cost Sharing of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, April.
    19. Yuliia Kyrdoda & Marco Balzano & Donata Vianelli, 2025. "The formation of a sustainable organizational identity: Insights from Brazilian coffee producers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1-18, January.
    20. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3080-:d:1624680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.