IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p2790-d1617046.html

Sustainable Urban-Rural Symbiosis in China: A Study from the Symbiosis Theory Perspective on Level Measurement and Spatial Difference Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ping Wang

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Bin Guo

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Zeliang Sun

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

Abstract

Urban-rural imbalance impedes sustainable development in modernizing nations. This paper examines China’s urban-rural relations via symbiosis theory, building a model and index system to assess urban-rural symbiosis, contributing to SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities). Focusing on 31 provinces and cities in China, this study uses data from 2022 and the entropy weight method to evaluate the current urban-rural symbiosis relationship in China. Findings highlight unsustainable urban-rural relations: Firstly, imbalances persist between urban and rural areas in China regarding resource allocation, public services, and development speed, hindering sustainable and equitable development. Secondly, spatial differentiation and insufficient flow of factors significantly restrict the development of urban-rural symbiosis, impacting resource efficiency and balanced regional growth. Thirdly, the levels of cultural and ecological symbiosis between urban and rural areas are low and uneven, posing risks to environmental sustainability and social cohesion. Recommendations include strengthening rural units for collaboration, using counties to improve the symbiosis interface, and optimizing the symbiotic environment. These measures aim to guide, incentivize, coordinate, and protect positive urban-rural relations, driving symbiosis towards a more balanced, inclusive, sustainable urban-rural development model for China, offering insights for similar nations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ping Wang & Bin Guo & Zeliang Sun, 2025. "Sustainable Urban-Rural Symbiosis in China: A Study from the Symbiosis Theory Perspective on Level Measurement and Spatial Difference Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2790-:d:1617046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2790/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2790/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fan, Shenggen & Chan-Kang, Connie, 2008. "Regional road development, rural and urban poverty: Evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 305-314, September.
    2. Xinggu Liu & Youxi Luo & Yifan Zhu & Linyi Guo, 2024. "Research on the Measurement and Effects of Urban–Rural Integration and Modernization in National Central Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 827-866, July.
    3. Zhao, Pengjun & Wan, Jie, 2021. "Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Changchun Feng & Hao Zhang & Liang Xiao & Yongpei Guo, 2022. "Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Xiji Jiang & Jiaxin Sun & Tianzi Zhang & Qian Li & Yan Ma & Wen Qu & Dan Ye & Zhendong Lei, 2025. "Defining Rural Types Nearby Large Cities from the Perspective of Urban–Rural Integration: A Case Study of Xi’an Metropolitan Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Ying Lu & Walter Timo de Vries, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Rural Development in China over the Past 40 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Maparu, Tuhin Subhra & Mazumder, Tarak Nath, 2017. "Transport infrastructure, economic development and urbanization in India (1990–2011): Is there any causal relationship?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 319-336.
    5. Qian Chen & Tingting Ye & Naizhuo Zhao & Mingjun Ding & Zutao Ouyang & Peng Jia & Wenze Yue & Xuchao Yang, 2021. "Mapping China’s regional economic activity by integrating points-of-interest and remote sensing data with random forest," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 1876-1894, September.
    6. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Danish Iqbal Godil & Zhang Yu & Farwa Abbas & Muhammad Asif Shamim, 2022. "Adoption of renewable energy sources, low‐carbon initiatives, and advanced logistical infrastructure—an step toward integrated global progress," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 275-288, February.
    7. Ling Zhang & Jingjing Hao & Xiaofeng Ji & Lan Liu, 2019. "Research on the Complex Characteristics of Freight Transportation from a Multiscale Perspective Using Freight Vehicle Trip Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Tsun Se Cheong & Yanrui Wu, 2013. "Globalization and Regional Inequality," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 13-10, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    9. Sirajudeen, Abdurrasheed Olayinka & Law, Teik Hua & Wong, Shaw Voon & Ng, Choy Peng, 2025. "Examining the effect of relative improvements in road mobility versus accessibility on the fatality-to-injury ratio: Insights from income as an intermediate variable," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 262-272.
    10. Mei Zhang & Jia Tang & Jun Gao, 2023. "Examining the Effects of Built Environments and Individual Characteristics on Commuting Time under Spatial Heterogeneity: An Empirical Study in China Using HLM," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Jieyi Guan & Zhuoga Danzeng & Xinyi Zhang & Xingchuan Gao & Renfeng Ma, 2025. "How Does Transport Accessibility Affect Residents’ Livelihood and Land Use Change? Evidence From the Tibetan Plateau," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    12. Ulengin, Fusun & Cekyay, Bora & Isik, Mine & Ozaydin, Ozay & Kabak, Özgür & Toktaş-Palut, Peral & Ekici, Sule Onsel & Topcu, Y. Ilker, 2021. "A simulation-based approach for improving the largest border crossing between Europe and Turkey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 350-363.
    13. Ahmed, M. & Gautam, M. & Sen, B., 2018. "Waves of Change: Understanding Ascent, Descent and Persistence of Poverty in Rural Bangladesh," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277340, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Sevgi Sezer & Tezcan Abasiz, 2017. "The Impact Of Logistics Industry On Economic Growth: An Application In Oecd Countries," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 5(1), pages 11-23.
    15. Ma, Kai & Zhao, Lei, 2024. "The impact of new energy transportation means on China's food import," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    16. Lu Ye & Zihao Wu & Ting Wang & Kangle Ding & Yu Chen, 2022. "Villagers’ Satisfaction Evaluation System of Rural Human Settlement Construction: Empirical Study of Suzhou in China’s Rapid Urbanization Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Arndt, Channing & Strzepek, Kenneth & Thurlow, James, 2011. "Climate Change and Infrastructure Investment in Developing Countries: The Case of Mozambique," WIDER Working Paper Series 092, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Tianle Li & Xinqi Zheng & Chunxiao Zhang & Ruiguo Wang & Jiayu Liu, 2022. "Mining Spatial Correlation Patterns of the Urban Functional Areas in Urban Agglomeration: A Case Study of Four Typical Urban Agglomerations in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Jian Tian & Suiping Zeng & Jian Zeng & Sen Wang, 2022. "How Urban Expansion Triggers Spatio-Temporal Differentiation of Systemic Risk in Suburban Rural Areas: A Case Study of Tianjin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, October.
    20. Song Liu & Yongwang Cao & Qi Gao & Weitao Liu, 2025. "Spatial Accessibility in Last-Mile Logistics: A New Dimension of Urban–Rural Integration," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2790-:d:1617046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.