IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2251-d1605720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Livestock and Water Resources: A Comparative Study of Water Footprint in Different Farming Systems

Author

Listed:
  • María Macarena Arrien

    (Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Ambientales (CINEA), Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Campus Universitario, Tandil 7000, Argentina
    Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires 1425, Argentina)

  • Maite M. Aldaya

    (Science Department, Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Arrosadia Campus, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
    Institute for Sustainability & Food Chain Innovation (IS-FOOD), Public University of Navarra (UPNA), Arrosadia Campus, 31006 Pamplona, Spain)

  • Corina Iris Rodríguez

    (Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Ambientales (CINEA), Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Campus Universitario, Tandil 7000, Argentina
    Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires 1425, Argentina)

Abstract

Livestock production systems are major consumers of freshwater, potentially compromising the sustainability of water resources at production sites. The water footprint (WF) quantifies the water consumed and polluted by a product or service. The aim of this study was to evaluate the WF of steer production from the cradle to the farm gate in representative intensive, extensive, and mixed farms located in the southeast of Buenos Aires province, Argentina. The WF to produce a live steer varied between 4247 and 5912 m 3 /animal. The extensive system contains the highest green WF but is also the most sustainable compared to industrial and mixed productions since it does not have an associated pollutant load or blue water. This work is the first approach to calculating the WF of live steers in Argentina carried out with local and detailed data and focuses on grey WF related to nitrogen leaching from effluents in intensive systems, showing that the blue and grey footprints increase as production intensifies. The information may be relevant for consumers and producers to make more informed decisions. Furthermore, it is essential for governments to promote sustainable practices in livestock farming, recognizing the dependence on water resources both domestically and throughout international supply chains, in order to assess their environmental policies and ensure national food security.

Suggested Citation

  • María Macarena Arrien & Maite M. Aldaya & Corina Iris Rodríguez, 2025. "Livestock and Water Resources: A Comparative Study of Water Footprint in Different Farming Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2251-:d:1605720
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2251/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2251/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rotz, C. Alan & Asem-Hiablie, Senorpe & Place, Sara & Thoma, Greg, 2019. "Environmental footprints of beef cattle production in the United States," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adriane Terezinha Schneider & Rosangela Rodrigues Dias & Mariany Costa Deprá & Darissa Alves Dutra & Richard Luan Silva Machado & Cristiano Ragagnin de Menezes & Leila Queiroz Zepka & Eduardo Jacob-Lo, 2024. "The Intersectionality Between Amazon and Commodities Production: A Close Look at Sustainability," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Angelo Frascarelli & Stefano Ciliberti & Sofia Maria Lilli & Paolo Pascolini & Jacopo Gabriele Orlando & Margherita Tiradritti, 2025. "Comparative Techno-Economic and Carbon Footprint Analysis of Semi-Extensive and Intensive Beef Farming," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Oliver Lazarus & Sonali McDermid & Jennifer Jacquet, 2021. "The climate responsibilities of industrial meat and dairy producers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Bonnin, Dennis & Tabacco, Ernesto & Borreani, Giorgio, 2021. "Variability of greenhouse gas emissions and economic performances on 10 Piedmontese beef farms in North Italy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    5. Elio Romano & Rocco Roma & Flavio Tidona & Giorgio Giraffa & Andrea Bragaglio, 2021. "Dairy Farms and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): The Allocation Criterion Useful to Estimate Undesirable Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Jessica Gilreath & Tryon Wickersham & Jason Sawyer, 2022. "Comparison of Methodologies Used to Estimate Enteric Methane Emissions and Warming Impact from 1920 to 2020 for U.S. Beef Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Castaño-Sánchez, José P. & Rotz, C. Alan & McIntosh, Matthew M. & Tolle, Cindy & Gifford, Craig A. & Duff, Glenn C. & Spiegal, Sheri A., 2023. "Grass finishing of Criollo cattle can provide an environmentally preferred and cost effective meat supply chain from United States drylands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    8. Tebila Nakelse & Elliott Dennis, 2024. "A Review of Sustainable Indices Relevant to the Agri-Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Abhishek Chaudhary & Denis Tremorin, 2020. "Nutritional and Environmental Sustainability of Lentil Reformulated Beef Burger," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Arrieta, Ezequiel M. & Cabrol, Diego A. & Cuchietti, Anibal & González, Alejandro D., 2020. "Biomass consumption and environmental footprints of beef cattle production in Argentina," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    11. repec:ags:aaea22:335742 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Evangelos Alexandropoulos & Vasileios Anestis & Federico Dragoni & Anja Hansen & Saoirse Cummins & Donal O’Brien & Barbara Amon & Thomas Bartzanas, 2023. "Decision Support Systems Based on Gaseous Emissions and Their Impact on the Sustainability Assessment at the Livestock Farm Level: An Evaluation from the User’s Side," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-29, August.
    13. Kim, Daesoo & Stoddart, Nick & Rotz, C. Alan & Veltman, Karin & Chase, Larry & Cooper, Joyce & Ingraham, Pete & Izaurralde, R. César & Jones, Curtis D. & Gaillard, Richard & Aguirre-Villegas, Horacio , 2019. "Analysis of beneficial management practices to mitigate environmental impacts in dairy production systems around the Great Lakes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Imran Hussain & Abdul Rehman, 2022. "How CO2 emission interacts with livestock production for environmental sustainability? evidence from Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8545-8565, June.
    15. Recktenwald, Erin B. & Ehrhardt, Richard A., 2024. "Greenhouse gas emissions from a diversity of sheep production systems in the United States," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    16. Batara Surya & Haeruddin Saleh & Hamsina Hamsina & Muhammad Idris & Despry Nur Annisa Ahmad, 2021. "Rural Agribusiness-Based Agropolitan Area Development and Environmental Management Sustainability: Regional Economic Growth Perspectives," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 142-157.
    17. Emilio Sabia & Sarah Kühl & Laura Flach & Christian Lambertz & Matthias Gauly, 2020. "Effect of Feed Concentrate Intake on the Environmental Impact of Dairy Cows in an Alpine Mountain Region Including Soil Carbon Sequestration and Effect on Biodiversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Silvia Grossi & Valentina Massa & Andrea Giorgino & Luciana Rossi & Matteo Dell’Anno & Luciano Pinotti & Filippo Avidano & Riccardo Compiani & Carlo Angelo Sgoifo Rossi, 2022. "Feeding Bakery Former Foodstuffs and Wheat Distiller’s as Partial Replacement for Corn and Soybean Enhances the Environmental Sustainability and Circularity of Beef Cattle Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.
    19. Merri E. Day & Minfeng Tang & Phillip A. Lancaster & Deann Presley & Dustin L. Pendell & Walter H. Fick & Luca Doro & Adam Ahlers & Andrew Ricketts, 2023. "Simulation of the Impact of Rangeland Management Strategies on Soil Health, Environmental Footprint, Economic Impact, and Human-Edible Nutrient Conversion from Grasslands in the Central and Northern G," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-43, August.
    20. Cordeiro, M.R.C. & Mengistu, G.F. & Pogue, S.J. & Legesse, G. & Gunte, K.E. & Taylor, A.M. & Ominski, K.H. & Beauchemin, K.A. & McGeough, E.J. & Faramarzi, M. & McAllister, T.A., 2022. "Assessing feed security for beef production within livestock-intensive regions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    21. Amelia Ahles & Marco A. Palma & Andreas C. Drichoutis, 2024. "Testing the effectiveness of lottery incentives in online experiments," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(4), pages 1435-1453, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2251-:d:1605720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.