IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2219-d1604955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Transition Pathways Approach for Energy Renovation in EU Building Market Ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Paola Lassandro

    (Construction Technologies Institute, National Research Council of Italy (ITC-CNR), Bari Branch, Via Paolo Lembo, 38/B, 70124 Bari, Italy)

  • Domen Bancic

    (Institute for Innovation and Development, University of Ljubljana, Kongresni trg 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Alice Bellazzi

    (Construction Technologies Institute, National Research Council of Italy (ITC-CNR), Headquarters San Giuliano Milanese, Via Lombardia, 49, 20098 San Giuliano Milanese, Italy)

  • Giulia De Aloysio

    (Certimac soc.cons.ar.l., Via Granarolo, 62, 48018 Faenza, Italy)

  • Anna Devitofrancesco

    (Construction Technologies Institute, National Research Council of Italy (ITC-CNR), Headquarters San Giuliano Milanese, Via Lombardia, 49, 20098 San Giuliano Milanese, Italy)

  • Maddalena Lukasik

    (Meta Group, Via Francesco Mancini, 23, 05100 Terni, Italy)

  • Miriam Navarro Escudero

    (Instituto Valenciano Edification, Universitat Politècnica de València, Edificio 1B, Puerta R, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 València, Spain)

  • Giulia Paoletti

    (Accademia Europea di Bolzano, Eurac Research, Legal Seat Drususallee/Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bozen, Italy)

  • Ana Sanchis Huertas

    (Instituto Valenciano Edification, Universitat Politècnica de València, Edificio 1B, Puerta R, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 València, Spain)

  • Jure Vetršek

    (Institute for Innovation and Development, University of Ljubljana, Kongresni trg 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Roberto Malvezzi

    (Engineering, ICT and Technologies for Energy and Transportation Department (DIITET), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Piazzale Aldo Moro, 7, 00185 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

The European Union aims to achieve climate neutrality by 2050, prioritizing energy efficiency particularly in the building sector. Despite significant policies, such as the EU Green Deal and Renovation Wave initiative, the rate of deep energy renovations remains insufficient, with only 0.2% annually versus the 3% required. Multiple barriers hinder the progress of deep energy renovations (DERs), including fragmentation among stakeholders, the limited coordination of RDI (Research, Development, and Innovation) efforts, and a lack of systemic approaches. The objective of this paper is to illustrate a holistic methodological approach for enhancing the DER market uptake based on transition pathways theory (TPT) and is designed to drive structural evolution in DER markets aimed at overcoming their main current constraints. To this end, five key transition pathways are outlined—namely institutionalization, clusterization, capitalization, digitalization, and exploitation—and are conceived for fostering coordination, integration, promotion, and efficient scaling of innovations along the whole DER value chain. This approach was tested in seven EU building market ecosystems under the H2020 re-MODULEES project, aimed at developing a market activation platform conceived as a digital enabler for next-generation One-Stop Shops (OSSs). This project yielded practical evidence on the potentiality of the TPT frame to strengthen and empower local ecosystems through stakeholders’ engagement and cooperation. The findings suggest that the TPT-based approach tested in re-MODULEES can effectively address structural challenges in diverse DER renovation markets, and for this reason, it may be also tested and extended in other ecosystems across Europe in order to be validated as a strategic approach at the EU level for facilitating the transition to low-carbon buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Paola Lassandro & Domen Bancic & Alice Bellazzi & Giulia De Aloysio & Anna Devitofrancesco & Maddalena Lukasik & Miriam Navarro Escudero & Giulia Paoletti & Ana Sanchis Huertas & Jure Vetršek & Robert, 2025. "A Transition Pathways Approach for Energy Renovation in EU Building Market Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-39, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2219-:d:1604955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2219/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2219/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariana Mazzucato, 2018. "Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 803-815.
    2. Rolando Biere-Arenas & Silvia Spairani-Berrio & Yolanda Spairani-Berrio & Carlos Marmolejo-Duarte, 2021. "One-Stop-Shops for Energy Renovation of Dwellings in Europe—Approach to the Factors That Determine Success and Future Lines of Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Ellwood, Paul & Williams, Ceri & Egan, John, 2022. "Crossing the valley of death: Five underlying innovation processes," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Luis Sanz-Menéndez & María Bordons & M Angeles Zulueta, 2001. "Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: its measure in three different research areas," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 47-58, April.
    5. Theo Lynn & Pierangelo Rosati & Antonia Egli & Stelios Krinidis & Komninos Angelakoglou & Vasileios Sougkakis & Dimitrios Tzovaras & Mohamad Kassem & David Greenwood & Omar Doukari, 2021. "RINNO: Towards an Open Renovation Platform for Integrated Design and Delivery of Deep Renovation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Tatjana Kosić & Slavica Stamatović Vučković & Kosara Kujundžić, 2023. "A Platform of Critical Barriers to Socially Sustainable Residential Buildings: Experts’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-33, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shufang Huang & Jin Chen & Liang Mei & Weiqiao Mo, 2019. "The Effect of Heterogeneity and Leadership on Innovation Performance: Evidence from University Research Teams in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Spaniol, Matthew J. & Rowland, Nicholas J., 2022. "Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Ralf Martin & Sam Unsworth & Anna Valero & Dennis Verhoeven, 2020. "Innovation for a strong and sustainable recovery," CEP Covid-19 Analyses cepcovid-19-014, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    4. Roth, Florian & Warnke, Philine & Niessen, Pia & Edler, Jakob, 2021. "Insights into systemic resilience from innovation research [Systemische Resilienz - Einsichten aus der Innovationsforschung]," Perspectives – Policy Briefs 03 / 2021, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    5. Magnus Henrekson & Anders Kärnä & Tino Sanandaji, 2022. "Schumpeterian entrepreneurship: coveted by policymakers but impervious to top-down policymaking," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 867-890, July.
    6. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    7. Ademuyiwa A. Lawal, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Innovative Automobile Policy on Employment in Nigeria and China," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(09), pages 679-686, September.
    8. Alje van Dam & Koen Frenken, 2020. "Vertical vs. Horizontal Policy in a Capabilities Model of Economic Development," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2037, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2020.
    9. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    10. Balkrishna C. Rao & Ingo Liefner, 2023. "Frugal Engineering of Advanced Frugal Innovations for Global Sustainability Entrepreneurship," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 32(2_suppl), pages 69-88, November.
    11. Odeh Al-Jayyousi & Hira Amin & Hiba Ali Al-Saudi & Amjaad Aljassas & Evren Tok, 2023. "Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Caravella, Serenella & Crespi, Francesco & Cucignatto, Giacomo & Guarascio, Dario, 2023. "Technological Sovereignty and Strategic Dependencies: The case of the Photovoltaic Supply Chain," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1330, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    13. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo & Flavia Costa, 2012. "Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(11), pages 2206-2222, November.
    14. Suarsana, Laura & Schneider, Tina & Warsewa, Günter, 2023. "Do regional innovation strategies meet societal challenges? A comparative analysis across regions in Belgium, Germany, Netherlands and Finland," Schriftenreihe Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft 40/2023, Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft (IAW), Universität Bremen und Arbeitnehmerkammer Bremen.
    15. Rafols, Ismael & Leydesdorff, Loet & O’Hare, Alice & Nightingale, Paul & Stirling, Andy, 2012. "How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1262-1282.
    16. Anne Rainville, 2022. "Green Public Procurement in Mission-Orientated Innovation Systems: Leveraging Voluntary Standards to Improve Sustainability Performance of Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Gasperin, Simone, 2022. "Lessons from the past for 21st century systems of state-owned enterprises: The case of Italy's IRI in the 1930s," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 599-612.
    18. Nomaler, Önder & Spinola, Danilo & Verspagen, Bart, 2021. "Demand-led industrialisation policy in a dual-sector small balance of payments constrained economy," MERIT Working Papers 2021-038, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    19. Llopis, Oscar & D'Este, Pablo & McKelvey, Maureen & Yegros, Alfredo, 2022. "Navigating multiple logics: Legitimacy and the quest for societal impact in science," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    20. Coveri, Andrea & Cozza, Claudio & Guarascio, Dario, 2023. "Blurring boundaries: an analysis of the digital platforms-military nexus," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1364, Global Labor Organization (GLO).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2219-:d:1604955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.