IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2219-d1604955.html

A Transition Pathways Approach for Energy Renovation in EU Building Market Ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Paola Lassandro

    (Construction Technologies Institute, National Research Council of Italy (ITC-CNR), Bari Branch, Via Paolo Lembo, 38/B, 70124 Bari, Italy)

  • Domen Bancic

    (Institute for Innovation and Development, University of Ljubljana, Kongresni trg 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Alice Bellazzi

    (Construction Technologies Institute, National Research Council of Italy (ITC-CNR), Headquarters San Giuliano Milanese, Via Lombardia, 49, 20098 San Giuliano Milanese, Italy)

  • Giulia De Aloysio

    (Certimac soc.cons.ar.l., Via Granarolo, 62, 48018 Faenza, Italy)

  • Anna Devitofrancesco

    (Construction Technologies Institute, National Research Council of Italy (ITC-CNR), Headquarters San Giuliano Milanese, Via Lombardia, 49, 20098 San Giuliano Milanese, Italy)

  • Maddalena Lukasik

    (Meta Group, Via Francesco Mancini, 23, 05100 Terni, Italy)

  • Miriam Navarro Escudero

    (Instituto Valenciano Edification, Universitat Politècnica de València, Edificio 1B, Puerta R, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 València, Spain)

  • Giulia Paoletti

    (Accademia Europea di Bolzano, Eurac Research, Legal Seat Drususallee/Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bozen, Italy)

  • Ana Sanchis Huertas

    (Instituto Valenciano Edification, Universitat Politècnica de València, Edificio 1B, Puerta R, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 València, Spain)

  • Jure Vetršek

    (Institute for Innovation and Development, University of Ljubljana, Kongresni trg 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Roberto Malvezzi

    (Engineering, ICT and Technologies for Energy and Transportation Department (DIITET), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Piazzale Aldo Moro, 7, 00185 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

The European Union aims to achieve climate neutrality by 2050, prioritizing energy efficiency particularly in the building sector. Despite significant policies, such as the EU Green Deal and Renovation Wave initiative, the rate of deep energy renovations remains insufficient, with only 0.2% annually versus the 3% required. Multiple barriers hinder the progress of deep energy renovations (DERs), including fragmentation among stakeholders, the limited coordination of RDI (Research, Development, and Innovation) efforts, and a lack of systemic approaches. The objective of this paper is to illustrate a holistic methodological approach for enhancing the DER market uptake based on transition pathways theory (TPT) and is designed to drive structural evolution in DER markets aimed at overcoming their main current constraints. To this end, five key transition pathways are outlined—namely institutionalization, clusterization, capitalization, digitalization, and exploitation—and are conceived for fostering coordination, integration, promotion, and efficient scaling of innovations along the whole DER value chain. This approach was tested in seven EU building market ecosystems under the H2020 re-MODULEES project, aimed at developing a market activation platform conceived as a digital enabler for next-generation One-Stop Shops (OSSs). This project yielded practical evidence on the potentiality of the TPT frame to strengthen and empower local ecosystems through stakeholders’ engagement and cooperation. The findings suggest that the TPT-based approach tested in re-MODULEES can effectively address structural challenges in diverse DER renovation markets, and for this reason, it may be also tested and extended in other ecosystems across Europe in order to be validated as a strategic approach at the EU level for facilitating the transition to low-carbon buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Paola Lassandro & Domen Bancic & Alice Bellazzi & Giulia De Aloysio & Anna Devitofrancesco & Maddalena Lukasik & Miriam Navarro Escudero & Giulia Paoletti & Ana Sanchis Huertas & Jure Vetršek & Robert, 2025. "A Transition Pathways Approach for Energy Renovation in EU Building Market Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-39, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2219-:d:1604955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2219/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2219/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariana Mazzucato, 2018. "Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 803-815.
    2. Rolando Biere-Arenas & Silvia Spairani-Berrio & Yolanda Spairani-Berrio & Carlos Marmolejo-Duarte, 2021. "One-Stop-Shops for Energy Renovation of Dwellings in Europe—Approach to the Factors That Determine Success and Future Lines of Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Ellwood, Paul & Williams, Ceri & Egan, John, 2022. "Crossing the valley of death: Five underlying innovation processes," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Luis Sanz-Menéndez & María Bordons & M Angeles Zulueta, 2001. "Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: its measure in three different research areas," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 47-58, April.
    5. Theo Lynn & Pierangelo Rosati & Antonia Egli & Stelios Krinidis & Komninos Angelakoglou & Vasileios Sougkakis & Dimitrios Tzovaras & Mohamad Kassem & David Greenwood & Omar Doukari, 2021. "RINNO: Towards an Open Renovation Platform for Integrated Design and Delivery of Deep Renovation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Tatjana Kosić & Slavica Stamatović Vučković & Kosara Kujundžić, 2023. "A Platform of Critical Barriers to Socially Sustainable Residential Buildings: Experts’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-33, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. repec:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:09:p:679-686 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Alje van Dam & Koen Frenken, 2020. "Vertical vs. Horizontal Policy in a Capabilities Model of Economic Development," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2037, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2020.
    4. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    5. Caravella, Serenella & Crespi, Francesco & Cucignatto, Giacomo & Guarascio, Dario, 2023. "Technological Sovereignty and Strategic Dependencies: The case of the Photovoltaic Supply Chain," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1330, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    6. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo & Flavia Costa, 2012. "Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(11), pages 2206-2222, November.
    7. Suarsana, Laura & Schneider, Tina & Warsewa, Günter, 2023. "Do regional innovation strategies meet societal challenges? A comparative analysis across regions in Belgium, Germany, Netherlands and Finland," Schriftenreihe Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft 40/2023, Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft (IAW), Universität Bremen und Arbeitnehmerkammer Bremen.
    8. Rafols, Ismael & Leydesdorff, Loet & O’Hare, Alice & Nightingale, Paul & Stirling, Andy, 2012. "How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1262-1282.
    9. Gasperin, Simone, 2022. "Lessons from the past for 21st century systems of state-owned enterprises: The case of Italy's IRI in the 1930s," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 599-612.
    10. Rund Awwad & Scott Dwyer & Andrea Trianni, 2025. "Unpacking Market Barriers to Energy Efficiency in Emerging Economies: Policy Insights and a Business Model Perspective from Jordan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Md Saifur Rahman & Md Faisal Abedin Khan & Lukas Giessen, 2024. "Analysing policy changes for achieving sustainable development goals: Insights from forest, environment and climate change action plan in Bangladesh," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2), pages 508-524, May.
    12. Llopis, Oscar & D'Este, Pablo & McKelvey, Maureen & Yegros, Alfredo, 2022. "Navigating multiple logics: Legitimacy and the quest for societal impact in science," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. Andrea Coveri & Claudio Cozza & Dario Guarascio, 2025. "Blurring Boundaries: An Analysis of the Digital Platforms-Military Nexus," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 1632-1663, August.
    14. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    15. Paola Perez-Aleman & Tommaso Ferretti, 2023. "Creating innovation capabilities for improving global health: Inventing technology for neglected tropical diseases in Brazil," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 84-114, March.
    16. Lilia Stubrin & Anabel Marin & Diego Murguía, 2024. "Innovation opportunities and backward linkages in mining: an analysis of Argentinean knowledge-intensive mining suppliers (KIMS)," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 33(4), pages 965-985.
    17. Garcia-Macia, Daniel & Korosteleva, Julia, 2025. "Tracing productivity growth channels in the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    18. Tea Petrin & Dragana Radicic, 2023. "Instrument policy mix and firm size: is there complementarity between R&D subsidies and R&D tax credits?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 181-215, February.
    19. Thomas SJ Smith, 2023. "Mapping complexity in deglobalisation: A typology of economic localisms from ‘hyper-localism’ to ‘strategic autonomy’," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(3), pages 242-263, May.
    20. Sanghamitra Chakravarty & Georgina Mercedes Gómez, 2024. "A Development Lens to Frugal Innovation: Bringing Back Production and Technological Capabilities into the Discourse," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(1), pages 82-101, February.
    21. Fares Georges Khalil, 2025. "Beyond incrementalism: A regenerative learning model for sustainable marketing and service ecosystems," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 74-94, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2219-:d:1604955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.