IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2096-d1602231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Support for Infrastructure Management of Public Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Nikša Jajac

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Geodesy, University of Split, Matice hrvatske 15, 21000 Split, Croatia)

Abstract

The management of public institutions is focused not only on providing and improving public services but also on managing the physical infrastructure that these institutions use—buildings for provision of such services. The focus of this paper is on decision support to the management of individual buildings and the set of such buildings (portfolio) during the planning phase. More precisely, it is directed towards support towards both the decision-maker (DM) and decision-making process (DMP) when planning construction activities/projects such as maintenance, renovation, reconstruction, extension, construction, design/preparation of project-technical documentation, etc. The aforementioned DMP includes the processing of a large amount of diverse data (technical, economic, social, etc.) expressed differently—numerically or descriptively, as well as in different units of measurement, simultaneously taking into account the different wishes and attitudes of stakeholders (consequently meeting their often conflicting goals and criteria). The above indicates that it is a complex and ill-defined multi-criteria problem faced by the DM/planner. On top of that, and knowing that the DM usually does not have all the necessary knowledge and skills, this paper proposes how to overcome these issues by supporting the DM within the DMP during such a planning process. The proposed concept promotes an integral (considering relevant aspects of this management problem) and inclusive (taking into account the views of relevant stakeholders) approach to managing complex construction projects and their portfolios. It is methodologically based on the logic of decision support systems and multi-criteria analysis. The multi-criteria methods used include the Preference Ranking Organization METhod for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) for the evaluation and comparison of alternatives in an integral manner, as well as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for determining the weights of criteria and achieving an inclusive and consistent approach to relevant stakeholders (based on the goal tree approach). The concept was tested on the planning of infrastructure management at a university in the Republic of Croatia, and it was proven to be useful because it provided the DM with a basis for decision making. The usefulness of the concept was confirmed by the concordance of the plan obtained using the concept and the activities/projects actually realized.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikša Jajac, 2025. "Decision Support for Infrastructure Management of Public Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-29, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2096-:d:1602231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2096/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2096/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paolo Rosasco & Leopoldo Sdino, 2023. "The Social Sustainability of the Infrastructures: A Case Study in the Liguria Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Ana Bošnjak & Nikša Jajac, 2023. "Determining Priorities in Infrastructure Management Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Bertrand Mareschal & Jean Pierre Brans, 1992. "PROMETHEE V: MCDM problems with segmentation constraints," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/9341, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Augustinas Maceika & Andrej Bugajev & Olga Regina Šostak & Tatjana Vilutienė, 2021. "Decision Tree and AHP Methods Application for Projects Assessment: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-33, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sueun Jung & Jihyun Lee, 2023. "Exploring a Conceptual Framework of Koreans’ Residential Satisfaction Based on Maslow’s Human Needs: A Qualitative and Quantitative Integrated Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-40, September.
    2. Jelena Kilić Pamuković & Katarina Rogulj & Daniela Dumanić & Nikša Jajac, 2020. "A Sustainable Approach for the Maintenance of Asphalt Pavement Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. A S Fernández-Castro & M Jiménez, 2005. "PROMETHEE: an extension through fuzzy mathematical programming," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(1), pages 119-122, January.
    4. repec:igg:jdsst0:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:1-20 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Kamran Khan & Thomas Henschel, 2024. "LCT-Based Framework for the Assessment of Sustainability: From the Perspective of Literature Review," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Önder Çağlayan & Murat Aymelek, 2024. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Support Model for Sustainable Ship Queuing Policy Application via Vessel Traffic Service (VTS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-33, May.
    7. Marcio Pereira Basilio & Valdecy Pereira & Fatih Yigit, 2023. "New Hybrid EC-Promethee Method with Multiple Iterations of Random Weight Ranges: Applied to the Choice of Policing Strategies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-34, October.
    8. Aikaterini Papapostolou & Charikleia Karakosta & Kalliopi-Anastasia Kourti & Haris Doukas & John Psarras, 2019. "Supporting Europe’s Energy Policy Towards a Decarbonised Energy System: A Comparative Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Abu-Taleb, Maher F. & Mareschal, Bertrand, 1995. "Water resources planning in the Middle East: Application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 500-511, March.
    10. Marta Bottero & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alessandra Oppio, 2019. "Ranking of Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Abandoned Industrial Heritage in Vulnerable Contexts: A Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Tatjana Vilutiene & Hojjat Adeli, 2017. "Sustainable Decision-Making in Civil Engineering, Construction and Building Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Víctor Blanco & Román Salmerón & Samuel Gómez-Haro, 2018. "A Multicriteria Selection System Based on Player Performance: Case Study—The Spanish ACB Basketball League," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1029-1046, December.
    13. G Özerol & E Karasakal, 2008. "Interactive outranking approaches for multicriteria decision-making problems with imprecise information," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(9), pages 1253-1268, September.
    14. George da Mota Passos Neto & Luciana Hazin Alencar & Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez, 2023. "Multiple-Criteria Methods for Assessing Social Sustainability in the Built Environment: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-24, November.
    15. Mateusz Trzeciak, 2021. "Sustainable Risk Management in IT Enterprises," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Indre Siksnelyte & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Deepak Sharma, 2018. "An Overview of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Dealing with Sustainable Energy Development Issues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Sha Fan & Hengjie Zhang & Huali Tang, 2019. "A Linguistic Hierarchy Model with Self-Confidence Preference Relations and Its Application in Co-Regulation of Food Safety in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Anthony Beck & Gavin Long & Doreen S Boyd & Julian F Rosser & Jeremy Morley & Richard Duffield & Mike Sanderson & Darren Robinson, 2020. "Automated classification metrics for energy modelling of residential buildings in the UK with open algorithms," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(1), pages 45-64, January.
    19. Lucia Rocchi & Anthony G. Rizzo & Luisa Paolotti & Antonio Boggia & Maria Attard, 2024. "Assessing climate change vulnerability of coastal roads," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 1-29, June.
    20. Irena Bitunjac & Nikša Jajac & Ivan Katavić, 2016. "Decision Support to Sustainable Management of Bottom Trawl Fleet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-23, March.
    21. Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano & Lucia Rocchi & Lorenzo Negri & Lea Piscitelli, 2025. "Evaluating the Progress of the EU Countries Towards Implementation of the European Green Deal: A Multiple Criteria Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-29, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2096-:d:1602231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.