IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jdsst0/v17y2025i1p1-20.html

Teaching Quality Evaluation for Air Volleyball in Sports Colleges: A Multiple-Attribute Group Decision-Making Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Ziqian Zhang

    (Department of Physical Education, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China)

  • Qingbao Wang

    (College of Physical Education, Baicheng Normal University, Baicheng, China)

  • Xinrui Xu

    (Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China)

Abstract

The evaluation of teaching quality for college air volleyball focuses on assessing programs that foster technical proficiency, tactical understanding, and sportsmanship in physical education environments. It evaluates the relevance of the curriculum, teaching methods such as skill drills and match simulations, and student engagement through collaborative and practical activities. The quality evaluation of air volleyball teaching in sports colleges is a multiple-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problem. Currently, the TODIM and EDAS methods have been proposed for MAGDM. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) are used to represent uncertain and ambiguous information during the quality evaluation process. In this study, an intuitionistic fuzzy number integrated TODIM-EDAS (IFN-TODIM-EDAS) approach is proposed for MAGDM within an IFS framework. Finally, a numerical analysis of air volleyball teaching quality evaluation in sports colleges demonstrates the applicability and effectiveness of the IFN-TODIM-EDAS approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziqian Zhang & Qingbao Wang & Xinrui Xu, 2025. "Teaching Quality Evaluation for Air Volleyball in Sports Colleges: A Multiple-Attribute Group Decision-Making Problem," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jdsst0:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:1-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJDSST.391329
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bertrand Mareschal & Jean Pierre Brans, 1992. "PROMETHEE V: MCDM problems with segmentation constraints," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/9341, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Ling Pan & Peijia Ren & Zeshui Xu, 2018. "Therapeutic Schedule Evaluation for Brain-Metastasized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with A Probabilistic Linguistic ELECTRE II Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A S Fernández-Castro & M Jiménez, 2005. "PROMETHEE: an extension through fuzzy mathematical programming," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(1), pages 119-122, January.
    2. Marcio Pereira Basilio & Valdecy Pereira & Fatih Yigit, 2023. "New Hybrid EC-Promethee Method with Multiple Iterations of Random Weight Ranges: Applied to the Choice of Policing Strategies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-34, October.
    3. Aikaterini Papapostolou & Charikleia Karakosta & Kalliopi-Anastasia Kourti & Haris Doukas & John Psarras, 2019. "Supporting Europe’s Energy Policy Towards a Decarbonised Energy System: A Comparative Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Abu-Taleb, Maher F. & Mareschal, Bertrand, 1995. "Water resources planning in the Middle East: Application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 500-511, March.
    5. G Özerol & E Karasakal, 2008. "Interactive outranking approaches for multicriteria decision-making problems with imprecise information," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(9), pages 1253-1268, September.
    6. Xiaohong Chen & Hui Wang & Xihua Li, 2024. "Doctor recommendation under probabilistic linguistic environment considering patient’s risk preference," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(1), pages 555-581, October.
    7. Indre Siksnelyte & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Deepak Sharma, 2018. "An Overview of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Dealing with Sustainable Energy Development Issues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Sha Fan & Hengjie Zhang & Huali Tang, 2019. "A Linguistic Hierarchy Model with Self-Confidence Preference Relations and Its Application in Co-Regulation of Food Safety in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano & Lucia Rocchi & Lorenzo Negri & Lea Piscitelli, 2025. "Evaluating the Progress of the EU Countries Towards Implementation of the European Green Deal: A Multiple Criteria Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-29, January.
    10. Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis & Virgilijus Skulskis, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Sustainable Selection of Insulation Materials in Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Seddiki, Mohammed & Bennadji, Amar, 2019. "Multi-criteria evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for electricity generation in a residential building," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 101-117.
    12. Mohammad Nikoo & Nafise Khorramshokouh & Shahryar Monghasemi, 2015. "Optimal Design of Detention Rockfill Dams Using a Simulation-Based Optimization Approach with Mixed Sediment in the Flow," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(15), pages 5469-5488, December.
    13. Govindan, Kannan & Shankar, Madan & Kannan, Devika, 2018. "Supplier selection based on corporate social responsibility practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 353-379.
    14. Irina Vinogradova, 2019. "Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Methods as a Part of Mathematical Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Nikša Jajac, 2025. "Decision Support for Infrastructure Management of Public Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-29, February.
    16. Antonio Morillas & Bárbara Díaz & Jesús González, 2005. "FUZZY COMPARATIVE CONCORDANCE ANALYSIS. Proposal and evaluation by a case study," Urban/Regional 0512004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Morais, Danielle Costa & de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira, 2007. "Group decision-making for leakage management strategy of water network," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 441-459.
    18. Dias, Luis C. & Costa, Joao P. & Climaco, Joao N., 1998. "A parallel implementation of the PROMETHEE method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 521-531, February.
    19. Nikša Jajac & Jelena Kilić & Katarina Rogulj, 2018. "An Integral Approach to Sustainable Decision-Making within Maritime Spatial Planning—A DSC for the Planning of Anchorages on the Island of Šolta, Croatia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, December.
    20. Ameeth Sooklall & Jean Vincent Fonou-Dombeu, 2022. "An Enhanced ELECTRE II Method for Multi-Attribute Ontology Ranking with Z-Numbers and Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-36, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jdsst0:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:1-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.