IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1819-d1596266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Conservation Efficiency: Metrics for the Management of Permanent Preservation Areas and Legal Reserves in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Iracema Alves Manoel Degaspari

    (Departamento Fertilidade do Solo, Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC), Ribeirão Preto 14001-970, Brazil)

  • Dionne Cavalcante Monteiro

    (PPGCIMES, Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Ananindeua 67130-660, Brazil)

  • Dirson Antônio Garcia

    (Endless Green Technology Ltda, Campinas 13083-872, Brazil)

  • Edgar Alberto de Brito

    (Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Escola de Engenharia de Piracicaba (EEP), Piracicaba 13414-040, Brazil)

  • Everton Gomede

    (Faculty of Science, Okanagan Campus, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, BC V6J 1E5, Canada)

  • Gilberto Schwertner

    (Gestão Ambiental, Instituto Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (IFRS), Bento Gonçalves 95700-344, Brazil)

  • Gean Davis Breda

    (FEEC/LARCOM, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas 13083-872, Brazil)

Abstract

The Brazilian Forest Code regulates Permanent Preservation Areas (PPA) and Legal Reserves (LR) across all federative states. These areas support the maintenance of ecological functions and are essential for biodiversity conservation and environmental balance. However, implementing these initiatives faces significant challenges, particularly in supporting the expansion of agribusiness. Effective management is essential for economic development while also preserving natural habitats. Our study relies on data from the Rural Environmental Registry (RER), managed by the Brazilian Federal Government, to assess PPA and LR in São Paulo. We apply the geometric metrics of the Circularity Index, Edge Factor, Fractal Dimension, and Compactness Index to evaluate these protected areas’ shape and physical characteristics, individually and as groups. The results underscore the relationship between the morphology of these areas and their ecological functions, including their susceptibility to edge effects and habitat degradation. Moreover, the large-scale analysis correlating several areas revealed the complexity of these landscapes, characterized by differing degrees of connectivity, vulnerability, and ecological efficiency, while assessing 645 districts. In conclusion, the results provide a framework for implementing protected areas that support ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation, particularly for enhancing agricultural productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Iracema Alves Manoel Degaspari & Dionne Cavalcante Monteiro & Dirson Antônio Garcia & Edgar Alberto de Brito & Everton Gomede & Gilberto Schwertner & Gean Davis Breda, 2025. "Evaluation of Conservation Efficiency: Metrics for the Management of Permanent Preservation Areas and Legal Reserves in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-32, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1819-:d:1596266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1819/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1819/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nazila Alaei & Raoof Mostafazadeh & Abazar Esmali Ouri & Zeinab Hazbavi & Mearaj Sharari & Guangwei Huang, 2022. "Spatial Comparative Analysis of Landscape Fragmentation Metrics in a Watershed with Diverse Land Uses in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Ion Andronache, 2024. "Analysis of Forest Fragmentation and Connectivity Using Fractal Dimension and Succolarity," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Júlia Graziela da Silveira & Sílvio Nolasco de Oliveira Neto & Ana Carolina Barbosa do Canto & Fernanda Figueiredo Granja Dorilêo Leite & Fernanda Reis Cordeiro & Luís Tadeu Assad & Gabriela Cristina , 2022. "Land Use, Land Cover Change and Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture and Livestock in the Amazon and the Atlantic Forest in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Daniel G. Costa & João Carlos N. Bittencourt & Franklin Oliveira & João Paulo Just Peixoto & Thiago C. Jesus, 2024. "Achieving Sustainable Smart Cities through Geospatial Data-Driven Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-30, January.
    5. Marco Taliento & Christian Favino & Antonio Netti, 2019. "Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Information on Economic Performance: Evidence of a Corporate ‘Sustainability Advantage’ from Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, March.
    6. da Cruz, Denis Conrado & Ferreira, Gracialda Costa & Ribeiro, Sabrina Santos & Schwartz, Gustavo & Monteiro, André, 2022. "Priority areas for restoration in permanent preservation areas of rural properties in the Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Saeid Homayoun, 2020. "Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Preeti Sharma & Priyanka Panday & R. C. Dangwal, 2020. "Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: a study of Indian companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 208-217, December.
    3. Fanny E. Berigüete & José S. Santos & Inma Rodriguez Cantalapiedra, 2024. "Digital Revolution: Emerging Technologies for Enhancing Citizen Engagement in Urban and Environmental Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-42, November.
    4. Taryn Renatta De Mendonca & Yan Zhou, 2019. "Environmental Performance, Customer Satisfaction, and Profitability: A Study among Large U.S. Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Marcello Risitano & Rosaria Romano & Vincenzo Rusciano & Gennaro Civero & Debora Scarpato, 2022. "The impact of sustainability on marketing strategy and business performance: The case of Italian fisheries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1538-1551, May.
    6. Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Maha Faisal Alsayegh, 2021. "Determinants of Corporate Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting among Asian Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, April.
    7. Adam Arian & John Sands & Stuart Tooley, 2023. "Industry and Stakeholder Impacts on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Financial Performance: Consumer vs. Industrial Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Yujuan Wu & Jacquline Tham, 2023. "The Impact of Executive Green Incentives and Top Management Team Characteristics on Corporate Value in China: The Mediating Role of Environment, Social and Government Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Jacqueline de Almeida Barbosa Franco & Ary Franco Junior & Rosane Aparecida Gomes Battistelle & Barbara Stolte Bezerra, 2024. "Dynamic Capabilities: Unveiling Key Resources for Environmental Sustainability and Economic Sustainability, and Corporate Social Responsibility towards Sustainable Development Goals," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Szennay, Áron, 2020. "A vállalati társadalmi felelősségvállalás megközelítései és a fenntartható fejlődés [How popular approaches to corporate social responsibility relate to sustainable development]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1057-1074.
    11. Alicia Fernanda Galindo-Manrique & Esteban Pérez-Calderón & Martha del Pilar Rodríguez-García, 2021. "Eco-Efficiency and Stock Market Volatility: Emerging Markets Analysis," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, April.
    12. Mohammed Abdullah Ammer & Meqbel Mishary Aliedan & Mansour Abdullah Alyahya, 2020. "Do Corporate Environmental Sustainability Practices Influence Firm Value? The Role of Independent Directors: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Ramírez-Orellana, Alicia & Martínez-Victoria, MCarmen & García-Amate, Antonio & Rojo-Ramírez, Alfonso A., 2023. "Is the corporate financial strategy in the oil and gas sector affected by ESG dimensions?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. Louis Maximilian Ronalter & Merce Bernardo & Javier Manuel Romaní, 2023. "Quality and environmental management systems as business tools to enhance ESG performance: a cross-regional empirical study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9067-9109, September.
    15. Eduardo Duque‐Grisales & Javier Aguilera‐Caracuel & Jaime Guerrero‐Villegas & Encarnación García‐Sánchez, 2020. "Can proactive environmental strategy improve Multilatinas' level of internationalization? The moderating role of board independence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 291-305, January.
    16. Tingting Hu & Kun You & Char-Lee Lok, 2025. "State ownership, political connection and ESG performance," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-33, February.
    17. D’Ecclesia, Rita Laura & Levantesi, Susanna & Stefanelli, Kevyn, 2024. "Measuring business impacts on the sustainability of European-listed firms," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    18. Bruna, Maria Giuseppina & Loprevite, Salvatore & Raucci, Domenico & Ricca, Bruno & Rupo, Daniela, 2022. "Investigating the marginal impact of ESG results on corporate financial performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    19. Archana Saxena & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Shaik Vaseem Akram & Bhekisipho Twala & Aman Singh & Elisabeth Caro Montero & Neeraj Priyadarshi, 2022. "Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Mariusz Zieliński & Małgorzata Adamska, 2022. "ESG Assessment from the Perspective of the Management Board and Trade Unions on the Example of the Opole Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1819-:d:1596266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.