IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p14876-d969229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Comparative Analysis of Landscape Fragmentation Metrics in a Watershed with Diverse Land Uses in Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Nazila Alaei

    (Watershed Management Science and Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, Urmia University, Urmia 57561-51818, Iran)

  • Raoof Mostafazadeh

    (Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Water Management Research Center, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 56199-11367, Iran)

  • Abazar Esmali Ouri

    (Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Water Management Research Center, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 56199-11367, Iran)

  • Zeinab Hazbavi

    (Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Water Management Research Center, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 56199-11367, Iran)

  • Mearaj Sharari

    (Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 56199-11367, Iran)

  • Guangwei Huang

    (Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Sophia University, Tokyo 102-8554, Japan)

Abstract

Knowledge of landscape fragmentation is known to be important in ecological integrity, hydrological processes, urban planning, sustainable land management, and policymaking. Recent anecdotal studies reveal a need for analytical quantification of landscape fragmentation at different levels. Therefore, the present study was conducted at KoozehTopraghi Watershed, Ardabil Province, Iran, where covers by different land uses/covers, to (a) explore the spatial pattern of landscape fragmentation metrics comprehensively in different scales, (b) distinguish the landscape fragmentation hot spots, and (c) investigate the spatial clustering of landscape fragmentation metrics. The behaviors of 7, 10, and 13 fragmentation metrics concerning three levels of patch, class, and landscape across 36 sub-watersheds were explored using principal component analysis (PCA) and expert elicitation. The Getis-Ord Gi* and local Moran’s I indices were also used to analyze the hot spots and clusters of landscape fragmentation, respectively. The results verified the high degree of spatial variability of the metrics in the three levels of fragmentation analysis. The class-level fragmentation analysis showed that the watershed is characterized by high-fragmented residential land use and low-fragmented dry farming land use. The spatial trend analysis at the landscape level further indicated that sub-watersheds 1, 2, 11, 21, to 26, and 34 to 36, mainly located in lowlands and central parts, allocated better status considering the fragmentation metrics rather than other parts of the watershed. The significant hot spots and high clusters of fragmentation also were distributed in different parts of the watershed in terms of various landscape metrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Nazila Alaei & Raoof Mostafazadeh & Abazar Esmali Ouri & Zeinab Hazbavi & Mearaj Sharari & Guangwei Huang, 2022. "Spatial Comparative Analysis of Landscape Fragmentation Metrics in a Watershed with Diverse Land Uses in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14876-:d:969229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14876/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14876/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suranga Wadduwage & Andrew Millington & Neville D. Crossman & Harpinder Sandhu, 2017. "Agricultural Land Fragmentation at Urban Fringes: An Application of Urban-To-Rural Gradient Analysis in Adelaide," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Kubacka, Marta & Żywica, Patryk & Vila Subirós, Josep & Bródka, Sylwia & Macias, Andrzej, 2022. "How do the surrounding areas of national parks work in the context of landscape fragmentation? A case study of 159 protected areas selected in 11 EU countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Dan Bărbulescu & Cerasella Craciun & Atena-Ioana Gârjoabă, 2023. "Protection of Environmental and Natural Values of Urban Areas against Investment Pressure: A Case Study of Romania and Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, January.
    2. Monika Kopecká & Harini Nagendra & Andrew Millington, 2018. "Urban Land Systems: An Ecosystems Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-4, January.
    3. Orsi, Francesco & Le Clec’h, Solen, 2023. "Effects of protected areas on the expansion of impervious surfaces in their vicinity: Evidence from Dutch Natura 2000," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    4. Liu, Shuchang & Xiao, Wu & Ye, Yanmei & He, Tingting & Luo, Heng, 2023. "Rural residential land expansion and its impacts on cultivated land in China between 1990 and 2020," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Bassim Mohammed Hashim & Ali Al Maliki & Maitham A. Sultan & Shamsuddin Shahid & Zaher Mundher Yaseen, 2022. "Effect of land use land cover changes on land surface temperature during 1984–2020: a case study of Baghdad city using landsat image," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(2), pages 1223-1246, June.
    6. Dan Yuan & Runhan Wu & Dong Li & Lei Zhu & Yaguang Pan, 2023. "Spatial Patterns Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Cultural Resources in the Yellow River National Cultural Park, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Yanting Zheng & Sai Zhao & Jinyuan Huang & Aifeng Lv, 2021. "Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Pattern and Mechanism of Land Use Mixture: Evidence from China’s County Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Baifei Ren & Keunhyun Park & Anil Shrestha & Jun Yang & Melissa McHale & Weilan Bai & Guangyu Wang, 2022. "Impact of Human Disturbances on the Spatial Heterogeneity of Landscape Fragmentation in Qilian Mountain National Park, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, November.
    9. Lu Niu & Mengyao Xu & Walter Timo de Vries, 2023. "Investigation and Comparison of Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Farmland Fragmentation in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region, China, and Bavaria, Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Mingarro, Mario & Lobo, Jorge M., 2023. "European National Parks protect their surroundings but not everywhere: A study using land use/land cover dynamics derived from CORINE Land Cover data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    11. Atena-Ioana Gârjoabă & Cerasella Crăciun & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor, 2023. "Natural Protected Areas within Cities: An International Legislative Comparison Focused on Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, June.
    12. Saulo Folharini & António Vieira & António Bento-Gonçalves & Sara Silva & Tiago Marques & Jorge Novais, 2023. "A Framework Using Open-Source Software for Land Use Prediction and Climate Data Time Series Analysis in a Protected Area of Portugal: Alvão Natural Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Yan Gao & Qian Dong & Yi Deng, 2022. "Are Farmers in National Park Communities Willing to Reallocate Their Lands? A Situational Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Lei Yan & Kairong Hong & Hui Li, 2021. "Transfer of Land Use Rights in Rural China and Farmers’ Utility: How to Select an Optimal Payment Mode of Land Increment Income," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Yuan Wang & Yilong Han & Lijie Pu & Bo Jiang & Shaofeng Yuan & Yan Xu, 2021. "A Novel Model for Detecting Urban Fringe and Its Expanding Patterns: An Application in Harbin City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Yaoben Lin & Danling Chen, 2022. "Functional Zoning and Path Selection of Land Comprehensive Consolidation Based on Grey Constellation Clustering: A Case Study of Dongying City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14876-:d:969229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.