IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i7p1279-d1177872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural Protected Areas within Cities: An International Legislative Comparison Focused on Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Atena-Ioana Gârjoabă

    (Doctoral School of Urban Planning, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, 10014 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cerasella Crăciun

    (Doctoral School of Urban Planning, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, 10014 Bucharest, Romania
    “Urban Planning and Landscape” Department, Faculty of Urbanism, Doctoral School of Urban Planning, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, 10014 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor

    (Doctoral School of Urban Planning, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, 10014 Bucharest, Romania
    Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Technical University of Moldova, 2004 Chisinau, Moldova
    National Institute for Research and Development in Constructions, Urbanism and Sustainable Spatial Development URBAN-INCERC, 21652 Bucharest, Romania
    National Institute for Research and Development in Tourism, 50741 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Urbanization occurs now more rapidly than before, due to the development of compact cities or urban sprawl, threatening quasi-natural areas, especially those protected within/near built-up ones. Europe lacks laws dedicated to natural protected areas within built-up areas, which are subject to the same provisions as natural protected ones, or a legislative vacuum. This research aimed to find the best planning approach for resiliently conserving and developing these areas and establishing grounds for a new tool used for planning the proximity of natural areas within cities. The methodology involved selecting two groups of countries, Nordic and eastern European, and treating these areas differently. The choice was based on specific political history. The study analyzed the legislative and planning framework and compared the approaches of 11 analyzed countries to pinpoint the basic aspects accounted for and applied to other European territories, in order to preserve the characteristics of urban morpho-typology and the particularities of local landscapes. The comparison results suggest solutions such as adopting specific regulations for urban protected areas and their adjacent zones through legal documents, completing/detailing environmental legislation in Nordic countries, adopting laws dedicated to protected natural areas within and/or close to built areas, and changing the approach to protecting natural areas with urban planning or land use tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Atena-Ioana Gârjoabă & Cerasella Crăciun & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor, 2023. "Natural Protected Areas within Cities: An International Legislative Comparison Focused on Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:1279-:d:1177872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/7/1279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/7/1279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kubacka, Marta & Żywica, Patryk & Vila Subirós, Josep & Bródka, Sylwia & Macias, Andrzej, 2022. "How do the surrounding areas of national parks work in the context of landscape fragmentation? A case study of 159 protected areas selected in 11 EU countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Maria Giovina Pasca & Grazia Chiara Elmo & Gabriella Arcese & Giulio Mario Cappelletti & Olimpia Martucci, 2022. "Accessible Tourism in Protected Natural Areas: An Empirical Study in the Lazio Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Maciej J. Nowak & Agnieszka Brelik & Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel & Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka & Justyna Przedańska, 2023. "Spatial Conflicts concerning Wind Power Plants—A Case Study of Spatial Plans in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Andresa Ledo Marques & Angélica Tanus Benatti Alvim & Jörg Schröder, 2022. "Ecosystem Services and Urban Planning: A Review of the Contribution of the Concept to Adaptation in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Małgorzata Blaszke & Iwona Foryś & Maciej J. Nowak & Bartosz Mickiewicz, 2022. "Selected Characteristics of Municipalities as Determinants of Enactment in Municipal Spatial Plans for Renewable Energy Sources—The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maciej Nowak & Viktoriya Pantyley & Małgorzata Blaszke & Liudmila Fakeyeva & Roman Lozynskyy & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor, 2023. "Spatial Planning at the National Level: Comparison of Legal and Strategic Instruments in a Case Study of Belarus, Ukraine, and Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Maciej J. Nowak & Renato Monteiro & Jorge Olcina-Cantos & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2023. "Spatial Planning Response to the Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation: An Analysis of Selected Instruments and Good Practices in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Dan Yuan & Runhan Wu & Dong Li & Lei Zhu & Yaguang Pan, 2023. "Spatial Patterns Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Cultural Resources in the Yellow River National Cultural Park, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Baifei Ren & Keunhyun Park & Anil Shrestha & Jun Yang & Melissa McHale & Weilan Bai & Guangyu Wang, 2022. "Impact of Human Disturbances on the Spatial Heterogeneity of Landscape Fragmentation in Qilian Mountain National Park, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, November.
    5. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Bartalucci, Federico, 2023. "Regional vulnerability to the green transition," Single Market Economics Papers WP2023/16, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (European Commission), Chief Economist Team.
    6. Dimitris Kourkouridis & Asimenia Salepaki, 2023. "Cooperative Tourism Marketing in Accessible Tourism Development: The Case of the Cross-Border Area of Greece–Republic of Northern Macedonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Bartalucci, Federico, 2023. "The green transition and its potential territorial discontents," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120536, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Paulina Legutko-Kobus & Maciej Nowak & Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor & Dan Bărbulescu & Cerasella Craciun & Atena-Ioana Gârjoabă, 2023. "Protection of Environmental and Natural Values of Urban Areas against Investment Pressure: A Case Study of Romania and Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, January.
    9. Mingarro, Mario & Lobo, Jorge M., 2023. "European National Parks protect their surroundings but not everywhere: A study using land use/land cover dynamics derived from CORINE Land Cover data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    10. Orsi, Francesco & Le Clec’h, Solen, 2023. "Effects of protected areas on the expansion of impervious surfaces in their vicinity: Evidence from Dutch Natura 2000," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    11. Nazila Alaei & Raoof Mostafazadeh & Abazar Esmali Ouri & Zeinab Hazbavi & Mearaj Sharari & Guangwei Huang, 2022. "Spatial Comparative Analysis of Landscape Fragmentation Metrics in a Watershed with Diverse Land Uses in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    12. Maciej J. Nowak & Agnieszka Brelik & Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel & Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka & Justyna Przedańska, 2023. "Spatial Conflicts concerning Wind Power Plants—A Case Study of Spatial Plans in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Saulo Folharini & António Vieira & António Bento-Gonçalves & Sara Silva & Tiago Marques & Jorge Novais, 2023. "A Framework Using Open-Source Software for Land Use Prediction and Climate Data Time Series Analysis in a Protected Area of Portugal: Alvão Natural Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, June.
    14. Yan Gao & Qian Dong & Yi Deng, 2022. "Are Farmers in National Park Communities Willing to Reallocate Their Lands? A Situational Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Yaoben Lin & Danling Chen, 2022. "Functional Zoning and Path Selection of Land Comprehensive Consolidation Based on Grey Constellation Clustering: A Case Study of Dongying City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:1279-:d:1177872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.