IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1730-d1594599.html

Economic Feasibility of Hydrogen Generation Using HTR-PM Technology in Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Saud A. Al-Shikh

    (MS in Nuclear Engineering Program, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
    King Abdullah City for Atomic and Renewable Energy (K.A.CARE), P.O. Box 2022, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Essam A. Al-Ammar

    (MS in Nuclear Engineering Program, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdullah S. Alomari

    (Nuclear Technologies Institute, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), P.O. Box 6086, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The global push for clean hydrogen production has identified nuclear energy, particularly high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs), as a promising solution due to their ability to provide high-temperature heat. This study conducted a techno-economic analysis of hydrogen production in Saudi Arabia using the pebble bed modular reactor (HTR-PM), focusing on two methods: high-temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE) and the sulfur–iodine (SI) thermochemical cycle. The Hydrogen Economic Evaluation Program (HEEP) was used to assess the economic viability of both methods, considering key production factors such as the discount rate, nuclear power plant (NPP) capital cost, and hydrogen plant efficiency. The results show that the SI cycle achieves a lower levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) at USD 1.22/kg H 2 compared to HTSE at USD 1.47/kg H 2 , primarily due to higher thermal efficiency. Nonetheless, HTSE offers simpler system integration. Sensitivity analysis reveals that variations in the discount rate and NPP capital costs significantly impact both production methods, while hydrogen plant efficiency is crucial in determining overall economics. The findings contribute to the broader discourse on sustainable hydrogen production technologies by highlighting the potential of nuclear-driven methods to meet global decarbonization goals. The paper concludes that the HTR-PM offers a viable pathway for large-scale hydrogen production in Saudi Arabia, aligning with the Vision 2030 objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Saud A. Al-Shikh & Essam A. Al-Ammar & Abdullah S. Alomari, 2025. "Economic Feasibility of Hydrogen Generation Using HTR-PM Technology in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1730-:d:1594599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1730/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1730/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schuetze, Benjamin & Hussein, Hussam, 2023. "The geopolitical economy of an undermined energy transition: The case of Jordan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lorenzo Damiani & Francesco Novarini & Guglielmo Lomonaco, 2025. "An FMEA Assessment of an HTR-Based Hydrogen Production Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Arkadiusz Małek, 2025. "Low-Emission Hydrogen for Transport—A Technology Overview from Hydrogen Production to Its Use to Power Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-32, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuemeng Zhao & Weilun Huang, 2024. "Global Geopolitical Changes and New/Renewable Energy Game," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Rund Awwad & Scott Dwyer & Andrea Trianni, 2025. "Unpacking Market Barriers to Energy Efficiency in Emerging Economies: Policy Insights and a Business Model Perspective from Jordan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Wesly Jean & Marcel Bursztyn & Nelson Bernal & Antonio C. P. Brasil Junior & Gabriela Litre & Daniela Nogueira, 2024. "Linking Energy Transition to Income Generation for Vulnerable Populations in Brazil: A Win-Win Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Sun, Yaling & Che, Yanbo & Guo, Xiao & Zhang, Shangyuan, 2025. "Optimal modelling and analysis of DG-GC joint multilateral transaction in energy blockchain environment: from the REP perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    5. Brahim Bergougui & Said Meziane, 2025. "Assessing the Impact of Green Energy Transition, Technological Innovation, and Natural Resources on Load Capacity Factor in Algeria: Evidence from Dynamic Autoregressive Distributed Lag Simulations and Machine Learning Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Qiang Wang & Xinhua Wang & Rongrong Li, 2024. "Geopolitical risks and energy transition: the impact of environmental regulation and green innovation," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Aydah Almasri & Ma Ying & Reem Aljaber & Jean Pierre Namahoro, 2025. "Evaluating Conflict Management Strategies and Supply Chain Performance: A Systematic Literature Review Within Jordan’s Food Manufacturing Sector," World, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Wenlong Yang & Wentian Shi & Dongcheng Chen, 2024. "Unveiling the nexus: exploring the influence of terrorism on energy trade in China and the Belt and Road countries," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Li, Xinqing & Zhang, Lixiao & Yang, Aidong & Hao, Yan & Zhang, Pengpeng & Xiong, Xin & Li, Yuqin & Zhang, Zijie, 2025. "Unraveling risk dynamics in the urban food-energy-water system for sustainable management: A coupled model considering trivariate complexity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    10. Sergey Zhironkin & Fares Abu-Abed, 2024. "Fossil Fuel Prospects in the Energy of the Future (Energy 5.0): A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-25, November.
    11. Alyamani, Rakan & Solangi, Yasir Ahmed & Almakhles, Dhafer, 2025. "Assessing factors and resilience strategies for sustainable energy transition in Saudi Arabia: An integrated SWOT-TOWS analysis and decision-making framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    12. Morgan, Brett & MacNeil, Robert, 2025. "Ending international fossil fuel finance: Lessons from the Clean Energy Transition Partnership," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    13. Georgios Karakatsanis & Nikos Mamassis, 2023. "Energy, Trophic Dynamics and Ecological Discounting," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-43, October.
    14. Chiang, Thomas C., 2025. "The effect of climate policy uncertainty and induced risks on US aggregate and sectoral stock returns," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    15. Mehdi Safaei & Khalid Yahya & Saleh Al Dawsari, 2024. "A Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Sustainable Supply Chain Capabilities in the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-25, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1730-:d:1594599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.