IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1663-d1593049.html

Exploring the Roles of Work Engagement, Psychological Empowerment, and Perceived Organizational Support in Innovative Work Behavior: A Latent Class Analysis for Sustainable Organizational Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Ercan Ergun

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management, Gebze Technical University, 41400 Kocaeli, Turkey)

  • Sezai Tunca

    (Faculty of Economics, Administrative, and Social Sciences, Management, Alanya University, 07400 Alanya, Antalya, Turkey)

  • Gulsum Cetinkaya

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management, Gebze Technical University, 41400 Kocaeli, Turkey)

  • Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu

    (Department of Management Information System, Faculty of Business Administration, Dogus University, 34775 Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

This study examines the relationship among work engagement, psychological empowerment, and perceived organizational support in fostering innovative work behavior (IWB) within sustainability-oriented organizations. Using latent class analysis (LCA), employees were classified into distinct profiles based on their levels of engagement, empowerment, and perceived support. The findings indicate that employees with higher engagement and organizational support exhibit significantly greater innovative work behavior, while those with lower psychological and organizational resources face challenges in contributing to innovation. This study also reveals that sustainability practices enhance the positive impact of these resources on innovation, improving both employee well-being and organizational performance. Grounded in Structural–Interactionist Innovation Theory, Self-Efficacy Theory, and Social Exchange Theory, this research provides practical insights for organizations to develop targeted strategies, such as tailored training programs and leadership support, to promote innovation and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ercan Ergun & Sezai Tunca & Gulsum Cetinkaya & Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu, 2025. "Exploring the Roles of Work Engagement, Psychological Empowerment, and Perceived Organizational Support in Innovative Work Behavior: A Latent Class Analysis for Sustainable Organizational Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1663-:d:1593049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1663/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1663/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Lamm & Jennifer Tosti-Kharas & Cynthia King, 2015. "Empowering Employee Sustainability: Perceived Organizational Support Toward the Environment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 207-220, April.
    2. Yinjia Miao & Shahid Iqbal & Arslan Ayub, 2023. "The Road to Eco-Excellence: How Does Eco-Friendly Deliberate Practice Foster Eco-Innovation Performance through Creative Self-Efficacy and Perceived Eco-Innovation Importance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Asif Khan & Li-Ru Chen & Chao-Yang Hung, 2021. "The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Supporting Second-Order Social Capital and Sustainable Innovation Ambidexterity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Syed Haider Ali Shah & Basheer M. Al-Ghazali & Sabeen Bhatti & Nida Aman & Mochammed Fahlevi & Mohammed Aljuaid & Fakhrul Hasan, 2023. "The Impact of Perceived CSR on Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors: The Mediating Effects of Environmental Consciousness and Environmental Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dianne Therese Marie C. Bahala & Rhey Manuel A Siao & Jr., Nenita I. Prado, 2026. "Employee Engagement, Digital Competency, and Work Autonomy on Innovation in Student Services," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(2), pages 6686-6699, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongyi Mao & Zongjun Wang & Lin Yi, 2021. "Does Entrepreneurial Orientation Lead to Successful Sustainable Innovation? The Evidence from Chinese Environmentally Friendly Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Asif Khan & Chih-Cheng Chen & Kwanrat Suanpong & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Santhaya Kittikowit & Shih-Chih Chen, 2021. "The Impact of CSR on Sustainable Innovation Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Second-Order Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Maria Järlström & Essi Saru & Sinikka Vanhala, 2018. "Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 703-724, October.
    4. Jiali Chen & Aiqing Zhang, 2023. "Exploring How and When Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Impacts Employees’ Green Innovative Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy and Environmental Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Saskia Crucke & Marie Servaes & Tom Kluijtmans & Shana Mertens & Eveline Schollaert, 2022. "Linking environmentally‐specific transformational leadership and employees' green advocacy: The influence of leadership integrity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 406-420, March.
    6. Khutso Mankgele & Olawale Fatoki, 2024. "Green empowering leadership and organisational citizenship behaviour toward the environment of employees in hospitality firms in South Africa," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 6(5), pages 57-67, October.
    7. Yun-Chan Yen & Shih-Chih Chen, 2025. "The Triple Pathway to Loyalty: Understanding How Banks’ Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Customers via Moral Identity, Service Quality, and Relationship Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Małgorzata Okręglicka & Prabhat Mittal & Valentinas Navickas, 2023. "Exploring the Mechanisms Linking Perceived Organizational Support, Autonomy, Risk Taking, Competitive Aggressiveness and Corporate Sustainability: The Mediating Role of Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Ma Ying & Naveed Ahmad Faraz & Fawad Ahmed & Ali Raza, 2020. "How Does Servant Leadership Foster Employees’ Voluntary Green Behavior? A Sequential Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Ge Yan & Liang Meng & Bo Li & Jiamin Li, 2023. "How Can Managers Promote Employee Sustainability? A Study on the Impact of Servant Leadership on Emotional Labor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Katarzyna Gadomska‐Lila & Agata Sudolska & Justyna Łapińska, 2025. "Green Proactivity in the Workplace: Organizational Drivers and Enablers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 9652-9671, December.
    12. Annum Tariq Maan & Ghulam Abid & Tahira Hassan Butt & Fouzia Ashfaq & Saira Ahmed, 2020. "Perceived organizational support and job satisfaction: a moderated mediation model of proactive personality and psychological empowerment," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Leonel Prieto & Muhammad Ruhul Amin & Arman Canatay, 2022. "Examining Social Sustainability in Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-43, September.
    14. Zhiyong Han & Qun Wang & Xiang Yan, 2019. "How Responsible Leadership Motivates Employees to Engage in Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment: A Double-Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, January.
    15. Andrey V. Sidorenkov & Eugene F. Borokhovski & Dmitry V. Vorontsov, 2023. "Associations of employees’ identification and citizenship behavior in organization: a systematic review and a meta-analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 695-729, June.
    16. Tahir Farid & Sadaf Iqbal & Jianhong Ma & Sandra Castro-González & Amira Khattak & Muhammad Khalil Khan, 2019. "Employees’ Perceptions of CSR, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Effects of Organizational Justice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Pascal Paillé & Nicolas Raineri & Olivier Boiral, 2019. "Environmental Behavior On and Off the Job: A Configurational Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 253-268, August.
    18. Alla Mostepaniuk & Elsie Nasr & Razan Ibrahim Awwad & Sameer Hamdan & Hasan Yousef Aljuhmani, 2022. "Managing a Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    19. Stanley YB Huang, 2024. "How can corporate social responsibility predict voluntary pro-environmental behaviors?," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(7), pages 3386-3398, November.
    20. Abdallah M. Elshaer & Hamoud Mohamed Jaber & Badawy S.Y. Sayed & Haidar Almubarake & Nabiha Mahmoud Bayoumi & Heba Ismail Mostafa & Mohammed Aldagheiri & Mohamed Fathy Agina, 2026. "Mapping the CSR–PEB mechanism: a mixed-method analysis using PLS-SEM and fuzzy-ISM," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1663-:d:1593049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.