IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1121-d1580254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Interpretable Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Tax Management in the Manufacturing Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Han

    (Business School, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Wen Xu

    (School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK)

  • Qian Song

    (Business School, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Kai Zhao

    (School of Engineering and Architecture, University College Cork, T12 HW58 Cork, Ireland)

  • Yao Xu

    (Business School, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

Abstract

The long-term development of the manufacturing industry relies on sustainable tax management, which plays a key role in optimizing production costs. While artificial intelligence models have been applied to tax-related predictions, research on their application for predicting tax management levels is quite limited, with no studies focused on the manufacturing industry in China. To enhance digital innovation in corporate management, this study applies interpretable artificial intelligence models to predict the tax management level, which helps decision-makers maintain it within a sustainable range. The ratio of total tax expense to total profits (ETR) is used to represent the tax management level, which is predicted using decision trees, random forests, linear regression, support vector regression, and artificial neural networks with eight input features. Comparisons among the developed models indicate that the random forest model exhibits the best performance in terms of prediction accuracy and generalization capability. Additionally, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) technique is integrated with the developed model to enhance the interpretability of its predictions. The SHAP results reveal the importance of the input features and also highlight the dominance of certain features. The results show that the ETR from the previous year holds the greatest importance, being more than twice as significant as the second most important factor, whereas the effect of board size is negligible. Moreover, benefiting from the local interpretations using SHAP values, this approach aids managers in making rational tax management decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Han & Wen Xu & Qian Song & Kai Zhao & Yao Xu, 2025. "Application of Interpretable Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Tax Management in the Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1121-:d:1580254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1121/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1121/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed K. Abd El Aal & Hossam M. GabAllah & Hanaa A. Megahed & Maha K. Selim & Mahmoud A. Hegab & Mohamed E. Fadl & Nazih Y. Rebouh & Heba El-Bagoury, 2024. "Geo-Environmental Risk Assessment of Sand Dunes Encroachment Hazards in Arid Lands Using Machine Learning Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Liang, Quanxi & Li, Qiumei & Lu, Meiting & Shan, Yaowen, 2021. "Industry and geographic peer effects on corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Lee, Namryoung & Swenson, Charles, 2016. "Effects of overseas subsidiaries on worldwide corporate taxes," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 47-59.
    4. Yoojin Shin & Jung-Mi Park, 2023. "The Effect of a Company’s Sustainable Competitive Advantage on Their Tax Avoidance Strategy—Focusing on Market Competition in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Alfonso Marino & Paolo Pariso & Michele Picariello, 2024. "Organizational and Energy Efficiency Analysis of Italian Hospitals and Identification of Improving AI Solutions," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 628-640, November.
    6. Markle, Kevin S. & Shackelford, Douglas A., 2012. "Cross-Country Comparisons of Corporate Income Taxes," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 65(3), pages 493-527, September.
    7. Sonja Olhoft Rego, 2003. "Tax†Avoidance Activities of U.S. Multinational Corporations," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 805-833, December.
    8. Jasmien, Lismont & Cardinaels, Eddy & Bruynseels, L.M.L. & De Groote, Sander & Baesens, B. & Lemahieu, W. & Vanthienen, J., 2018. "Predicting tax avoidance by means of social network analytics," Other publications TiSEM 8eb577ff-407b-4fb0-b679-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Esraa Faisal Malik & Khai Wah Khaw & Bahari Belaton & Wai Peng Wong & XinYing Chew, 2022. "Credit Card Fraud Detection Using a New Hybrid Machine Learning Architecture," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Roman Lanis & Grant Richardson, 2015. "Is Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Associated with Tax Avoidance?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 439-457, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cooper, Maggie & Nguyen, Quyen T.K., 2019. "Understanding the interaction of motivation and opportunity for tax planning inside US multinationals: A qualitative study," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1-1.
    2. Probowo Erawan Sastroredjo & Marcel Ausloos & Polina Khrennikova, 2025. "Environmental Performance, Financial Constraint and Tax Avoidance Practices: Insights from FTSE All-Share Companies," Papers 2509.08450, arXiv.org.
    3. Luca Menicacci & Lorenzo Simoni, 2024. "Negative media coverage of ESG issues and corporate tax avoidance," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(7), pages 1-33, February.
    4. Akmalia M. Ariff & Khairul Anuar Kamarudin, 2019. "Institutional Quality, Tax Avoidance, and Analysts' Forecast: International Evidence," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 15-35.
    5. Thomsen, Martin & Watrin, Christoph, 2018. "Tax avoidance over time: A comparison of European and U.S. firms," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 40-63.
    6. C. S. Agnes Cheng & Jaehyeon Kim & Mooweon Rhee & Jian Zhou, 2022. "Time Orientation in Languages and Tax Avoidance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 625-650, October.
    7. Alfred Tran & Wanmeng Xu, 2024. "A study of cross‐border profit shifting channels: Evidence from Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(1), pages 869-901, March.
    8. Hasan, Mostafa Monzur & Lobo, Gerald J. & Qiu, Buhui, 2021. "Organizational capital, corporate tax avoidance, and firm value," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Abdullah Munawir Almutairi & Samir Ibrahim Abdelazim, 2024. "The Impact of CSR on Tax Avoidance: The Moderating Role of Political Connections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Cooper, Maggie & Nguyen, Quyen T.K., 2020. "Multinational enterprises and corporate tax planning: A review of literature and suggestions for a future research agenda," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    11. Hamisi K. Sama, 2022. "Conceptualising Tax Avoidance on Industry 4.0 in Tanzania: The Imperatives of Value Chain Analysis," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 123-134.
    12. Chen, Zhihong & Hope, Ole-Kristian & Li, Qingyuan & Li, Yongbo, 2024. "Offshore activities and corporate tax avoidance11We appreciate comments and suggestions from Morten Bennedsen (the editor), an anonymous reviewer, and the seminar participants at the Hong Kong Univers," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    13. Michael Overesch & Sina Willkomm, 2025. "The relation between corporate social responsibility and profit shifting of multinational enterprises," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 32(2), pages 466-500, April.
    14. Jiaojiao Qin & Jun Lin & Yan Xin, 2024. "Corporate tax avoidance: The impact of performance above aspiration and CEO experience," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 2301-2331, December.
    15. Christofer Adrian & Mukesh Garg & Anh Viet Pham & Soon-Yeow Phang & Cameron Truong, 2023. "Do Natural Disasters Affect Corporate Tax Avoidance? The Case of Drought," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 105-135, August.
    16. Argilés-Bosch, Josep M. & Somoza, Antonio & Ravenda, Diego & García-Blandón, Josep, 2020. "An empirical examination of the influence of e-commerce on tax avoidance in Europe," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    17. Mahmud Hossain & Gerald J. Lobo & Santanu Mitra, 2023. "Firm-level political risk and corporate tax avoidance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 295-327, January.
    18. Lee, Namryoung & Swenson, Charles, 2016. "Effects of overseas subsidiaries on worldwide corporate taxes," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 47-59.
    19. Serhii Kanyhin & Svitlana Achkasova & Viktoriia Tyschenko & Vlada Karpova & Oleksii Naidenko, 2025. "Bankruptcy Risks Assessment: A Comprehensive Review of Qualitative Indicators," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 22-44.
    20. Behnam Karamshahi & Zeinab Azami & Tabandeh Salehi, 2018. "The association between competition power in markets and tax avoidance: evidence from Tehran stock exchange," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(3), pages 323-339, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1121-:d:1580254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.