IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p599-d1566705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Space Syntax Analysis of Gated Communities in Jordan: Examining Urban Connectivity and Social Impact

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Hammad

    (Institute for Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities (ISILC), Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

  • Mengbi Li

    (Institute for Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities (ISILC), Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

  • Zora Vrcelj

    (Institute for Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities (ISILC), Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

Abstract

The trend of gated communities is becoming the new alternative housing for the high-end residents of Jordan, reflecting global patterns of urbanisation. However, their emergence on the outskirts of Amman on vacant lands requires an early proactive planning approach to ensure their development in response to the growth of the surrounding areas, fostering an integrated urban fabric. This article examines whether gated communities contribute to urban discontinuity and lead to social segregation. The study employs a space syntax analysis on two cases in Amman to assess their integration, accessibility, and navigability to address the study’s key questions related to its integration, design implications, and spatial layout. Findings reveal significant spatial segregation, with low levels of integration and high step depth values, indicating potential challenges in navigation, connectivity, residents’ mobility, accessibility, and safety. The article suggests the importance of re-evaluating the design and planning approaches for these developments to promote organic townscape growth to ensure smooth integration with the surroundings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Hammad & Mengbi Li & Zora Vrcelj, 2025. "Space Syntax Analysis of Gated Communities in Jordan: Examining Urban Connectivity and Social Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:599-:d:1566705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/599/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/599/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu Wang & David Shaw & Ke Yuan, 2018. "Gated Neighborhoods, Privatized Amenities and Fragmented Society: Evidence from Residential Experience and Implications for Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Rodrigo Salcedo & Alvaro Torres, 2004. "Gated Communities in Santiago: Wall or Frontier?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 27-44, March.
    3. Jewkes, Rachel & Murcott, Anne, 1996. "Meanings of community," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 555-563, August.
    4. Claudia Yamu & Akkelies van Nes & Chiara Garau, 2021. "Bill Hillier’s Legacy: Space Syntax—A Synopsis of Basic Concepts, Measures, and Empirical Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng Dai & Song Han & Guannan Fu & Hui Fu & Yanjun Wang, 2023. "Optimization Path of Metro Commercial Passageway Based on Computational Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. C. Marlene Fiol & Edward J. O'Connor, 2002. "When Hot and Cold Collide in Radical Change Processes: Lessons from Community Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(5), pages 532-546, October.
    3. Yoonseuk Woo & Chris Webster, 2014. "Co-evolution of gated communities and local public goods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(12), pages 2539-2554, September.
    4. Manuel Tironi, 2009. "The Lost Community? Public Housing and Social Capital in Santiago de Chile, 1985–2001," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 974-997, December.
    5. Xiaogang Feng & Moqing Hu & Sekhar Somenahalli & Wenbin Zhang & Kunyan Liu & Meng Li & Zaihui Zhou & Fengxia Li, 2025. "Study on the Spatial Morphology of Ando Tibetan Traditional Villages in China: A Case of Traditional Villages in Huangnan Prefecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Chaitawat Boonjubun, 2019. "Also the Urban Poor Live in Gated Communities: A Bangkok Case Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Chad Stephen Boda, 2018. "Community as a Key Word: A Heuristic for Action-Oriented Sustainability Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Yiran Zhang & Zongsheng Huang, 2025. "Genetic Characteristics of Spatial Network Structures in Traditional Bouyei Village Architecture in Central Guizhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Reza Askarizad & Jinliao He, 2022. "Perception of Spatial Legibility and Its Association with Human Mobility Patterns: An Empirical Assessment of the Historical Districts in Rasht, Iran," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Adrienne La Grange, 2014. "Hong Kong's Gating Machine," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 251-269, March.
    11. Dawei Yang & Xiaodong Liu, 2025. "A Framework for Mapping Urban Spatial Evolution: Quantitative Insights from Historical GIS and Space Syntax in Xi’an," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-36, April.
    12. Shaobo Zhou & Xiaodong Zang & Junheng Yang & Wanying Chen & Jiahao Li & Shuyi Chen, 2023. "Modelling the Coupling Relationship between Urban Road Spatial Structure and Traffic Flow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Kai Zhang & Dong Yan, 2023. "Enhancing the Community Environment in Populous Residential Districts: Neighborhood Amenities and Residents’ Daily Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, September.
    14. Shiran Geng & Hing-Wah Chau & Elmira Jamei & Zora Vrcelj, 2022. "Understanding the Street Layout of Melbourne’s Chinatown as an Urban Heritage Precinct in a Grid System Using Space Syntax Methods and Field Observation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.
    15. Charlotte Lemanski, 2006. "Spaces of Exclusivity or Connection? Linkages between a Gated Community and its Poorer Neighbour in a Cape Town Master Plan Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(2), pages 397-420, February.
    16. Ballard, Richard & Jones, Gareth A. & Ngwenya, Makale, 2021. "Trickle-out urbanism: are Johannesburg’s gated estates good for their poor neighbours?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110855, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Kestutis Zaleckis & Szymon Chmielewski & Jūratė Kamičaitytė & Indre Grazuleviciute-Vileniske & Halina Lipińska, 2022. "Walkability Compass—A Space Syntax Solution for Comparative Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    18. Draper, Alizon Katharine & Hewitt, Gillian & Rifkin, Susan, 2010. "Chasing the dragon: Developing indicators for the assessment of community participation in health programmes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1102-1109, September.
    19. Gabriel Fauveaud, 2016. "Residential Enclosure, Power and Relationality: Rethinking Sociopolitical Relations in Southeast Asian Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 849-865, July.
    20. Francisca B. Márquez & Francisca P. Pérez, 2008. "Spatial Frontiers and Neo-communitarian Identities in the City: The Case of Santiago de Chile," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(7), pages 1461-1483, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:599-:d:1566705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.