IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p534-d1565151.html

Alkali Pretreatment of Lignocellulose Feedstock Improves Morphological Structure and Biomethane Yield

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel M. Madyira

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering Science, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg P.O. Box 524, South Africa)

  • Kehinde O. Olatunji

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering Science, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg P.O. Box 524, South Africa
    Process, Energy and Environmental Technology Station, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg P.O. Box 524, South Africa)

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of NaOH pretreatment on the microstructural distribution and biomethane released from Xyris capensis . Xyris capensis was pretreated with NaOH using 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5% w / w concentrations for 60, 45, 30, 20, and 15 min of exposure time, respectively, at a 90 °C autoclave temperature. The impacts of the pretreatment technique on microstructural arrangement, crystallinity, and functional groups were examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffraction, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), respectively. NaOH-pretreated and untreated feedstocks were digested at the laboratory scale at a mesophilic temperature (37 ± 2 °C) for 35 days for their biomethane potential. It was discovered from the SEM analysis that NaOH pretreatment affects the microstructural arrangement of Xyris capensis , and the sample with the longer exposure time is the most affected. The results of XRD and FTIR also indicated that NaOH pretreatment lowered the crystallinity of the feedstock and significantly influenced the functional groups at varying degrees. Biomethane yield was recorded to be 258.68, 287.80, 304.02, 328.20, 310.20, and 135.06 mL CH 4 /gVS added , representing 91.53, 113.09, 125.10, 143.00, and 129.68% more increases than the untreated feedstock. It was discovered that the optimum biomethane generation was achieved when 4% w / w of NaOH concentration was utilized for 20 min. This study shows that a higher NaOH concentration with a shorter retention time is more suitable for Xyris capensis . This pretreatment method can improve the biomethane yield of Xyris capensis and can be investigated for industrial applications and its use on other lignocellulose feedstocks, especially energy grasses.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel M. Madyira & Kehinde O. Olatunji, 2025. "Alkali Pretreatment of Lignocellulose Feedstock Improves Morphological Structure and Biomethane Yield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:534-:d:1565151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/534/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/534/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tawaf Ali Shah & Sabiha Khalid & Hiba-Allah Nafidi & Ahmad Mohammad Salamatullah & Mohammed Bourhia, 2023. "Sodium Hydroxide Hydrothermal Extraction of Lignin from Rice Straw Residue and Fermentation to Biomethane," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Rizzi, Francesco & van Eck, Nees Jan & Frey, Marco, 2014. "The production of scientific knowledge on renewable energies: Worldwide trends, dynamics and challenges and implications for management," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 657-671.
    3. Kehinde O. Olatunji & Daniel M. Madyira, 2023. "Optimization of Biomethane Yield of Xyris capensis Grass Using Oxidative Pretreatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-11, May.
    4. Qiao, Wei & Yan, Xiuyi & Ye, Junhui & Sun, Yifei & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Zhongzhi, 2011. "Evaluation of biogas production from different biomass wastes with/without hydrothermal pretreatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3313-3318.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akerke Toleugazykyzy & Kairat Bekbayev & Bakytzhan Bolkenov & Duried Alwazeer & Berdikul Rskeldiyev & Kairat Kuterbekov & Kenzhebatyr Bekmyrza & Asset Kabyshev & Marzhan Kubenova & Serikzhan Opakhai, 2025. "Comprehensive Review of Recent Trends in the Use of Deep Eutectic Solvents for the Valorization of Secondary Lignocellulosic Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meneses-Quelal Orlando & Velázquez-Martí Borja, 2020. "Pretreatment of Animal Manure Biomass to Improve Biogas Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.
    2. Giovanni Matteo & Pierfrancesco Nardi & Stefano Grego & Caterina Guidi, 2018. "Bibliometric analysis of Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment research," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 508-516, December.
    3. Bidart, Christian & Fröhling, Magnus & Schultmann, Frank, 2014. "Electricity and substitute natural gas generation from the conversion of wastewater treatment plant sludge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 404-413.
    4. Nunes, L.J.R. & Matias, J.C.O. & Catalão, J.P.S., 2016. "Wood pellets as a sustainable energy alternative in Portugal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1011-1016.
    5. Padi, Richard Kingsley & Douglas, Sean & Murphy, Fionnuala, 2023. "Techno-economic potentials of integrating decentralised biomethane production systems into existing natural gas grids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    6. Avaci, Angelica Buzinaro & Melegari de Souza, Samuel Nelson & Werncke, Ivan & Chaves, Luiz Inácio, 2013. "Financial economic scenario for the microgeneration of electric energy from swine culture-originated biogas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 272-276.
    7. Mukawa, Jakub & Rzepecki, Tadeusz & Banaś, Marian & Pająk, Tadeusz & Gaska, Krzysztof, 2024. "Sewage sludge thermal hydrolysis impact on the quality of biogas in anaerobic digestion process – siloxanes and VOCs studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    8. T. Dlabaja & J. Malaťák, 2013. "Optimization of anaerobic fermentation of kitchen waste," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(1), pages 1-8.
    9. Simona Domazetovska & Vladimir Strezov & Risto V. Filkoski & Tao Kan, 2023. "Exploring the Potential of Biomass Pyrolysis for Renewable and Sustainable Energy Production: A Comparative Study of Corn Cob, Vine Rod, and Sunflower," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    11. Jayant Kumar & Savita Vyas, 2025. "Comprehensive review of biomass utilization and gasification for sustainable energy production," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 1-40, March.
    12. Ayman Awad & Hussein Abdel-Mawgoud & Salah Kamel & Abdalla A. Ibrahim & Francisco Jurado, 2021. "Developing a Hybrid Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Allocation of Renewable DGs in Distribution Network," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Aragon-Briceño, Christian & Pożarlik, Artur & Bramer, Eddy & Brem, Gerrit & Wang, Shule & Wen, Yuming & Yang, Weihong & Pawlak-Kruczek, Halina & Niedźwiecki, Łukasz & Urbanowska, Agnieszka & Mościcki,, 2022. "Integration of hydrothermal carbonization treatment for water and energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste digestate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 577-591.
    14. Jun Pu & Taoli Huhe & Xiao Ding & Ruling Yuan & Sainan Zhang & Jianjun Ren & Dongze Niu, 2025. "Co-Production of Polysaccharides and Platform Sugars from Wheat Straw Fermented with Irpex lacteus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Di Maria, Francesco & Micale, Caterina & Sordi, Alessio, 2014. "Electrical energy production from the integrated aerobic-anaerobic treatment of organic waste by ORC," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 461-467.
    16. Kingsley Ukoba & Kehinde O. Olatunji & Eyitayo Adeoye & Tien-Chien Jen & Daniel M. Madyira, 2024. "Optimizing renewable energy systems through artificial intelligence: Review and future prospects," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(7), pages 3833-3879, November.
    17. Venus, Terese E. & Strauss, Felix & Venus, Thomas J. & Sauer, Johannes, 2021. "Understanding stakeholder preferences for future biogas development in Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Li, Yue & Chen, Yinguang & Wu, Jiang, 2019. "Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 120-137.
    19. Aragón-Briceño, C.I. & Grasham, O. & Ross, A.B. & Dupont, V. & Camargo-Valero, M.A., 2020. "Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage digestate at wastewater treatment works: Influence of solid loading on characteristics of hydrochar, process water and plant energetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 959-973.
    20. Fernandes, Daniel J. & Ferreira, Ana F. & Fernandes, Edgar C., 2023. "Biogas and biomethane production potential via anaerobic digestion of manure: A case study of Portugal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:534-:d:1565151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.