IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9383-d1777178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transforming Data and Capacity-Limited Stock Assessment: Achieving Risk Equivalence with Hierarchical Assessment Frameworks and Auxiliary Data

Author

Listed:
  • Laurence T. Kell

    (Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, Weeks Building, 16-18 Prince’s Gardens, London SW7 1NE, UK)

  • Massimiliano Cardinale

    (Department of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Marine Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Turistgatan 5, SE-453 30 Lysekil, Sweden)

  • Iago Mosqueira

    (Wageningen Marine Research, Haringkade 1, 1976 CP IJmuiden, The Netherlands)

  • Henning Winker

    (Department of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Marine Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Turistgatan 5, SE-453 30 Lysekil, Sweden)

  • Rishi Sharma

    (Food and Agricultural Organization, Fishery and Aquaculture Division, 00153 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Ensuring the sustainability of fisheries worldwide requires that scientific advice remain effective even when data and capacity are limited. To address these challenges, we propose a hierarchical assessment framework (HAF) capable of integrating auxiliary information, such as empirical indicators for fishing pressure, within a Bayesian state-space biomass dynamic modelling framework. The aim is to provide risk-equivalent advice to ensure that management does not penalise data-limited fisheries with undue precaution (and loss of potential yield), nor expose them to a higher risk of overexploitation. To achieve this, we evaluated performance using classification skill metrics, such as true skill, for stock status relative to maximum sustainable yield (MSY)-based reference points. Results demonstrate that incorporating auxiliary data, particularly fishing mortality indices from periods of high exploitation, substantially improves the accuracy of stock status classification. Adoption of hierarchical assessment frameworks will support targeted data collection and evidence-based, adaptive fisheries management.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurence T. Kell & Massimiliano Cardinale & Iago Mosqueira & Henning Winker & Rishi Sharma, 2025. "Transforming Data and Capacity-Limited Stock Assessment: Achieving Risk Equivalence with Hierarchical Assessment Frameworks and Auxiliary Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9383-:d:1777178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9383/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9383/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonah Gabry & Daniel Simpson & Aki Vehtari & Michael Betancourt & Andrew Gelman, 2019. "Visualization in Bayesian workflow," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 182(2), pages 389-402, February.
    2. Laurence T. Kell & Rishi Sharma, 2025. "An Evaluation of the Robustness of Length-Based Stock Assessment Approaches for Sustainable Fisheries Management in Data and Capacity Limited Situations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Andrea Saltelli & Gabriele Bammer & Isabelle Bruno & Erica Charters & Monica Di Fiore & Emmanuel Didier & Wendy Nelson Espeland & John Kay & Samuele Lo Piano & Deborah Mayo & Roger Pielke Jr & Tommaso, 2020. "Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto," Nature, Nature, vol. 582(7813), pages 482-484, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:osfxxx:enzgs_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Brian Hartley, 2020. "Corridor stability of the Kaleckian growth model: a Markov-switching approach," Working Papers 2013, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2020.
    3. Lu, Xuefei & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2023. "Global sensitivity analysis in epidemiological modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 9-24.
    4. Barakat, Bilal Fouad & Dharamshi, Ameer & Alkema, Leontine & Antoninis, Manos, 2021. "Adjusted Bayesian Completion Rates (ABC) Estimation," SocArXiv at368, Center for Open Science.
    5. Perepolkin, Dmytro & Goodrich, Benjamin & Sahlin, Ullrika, 2023. "The tenets of quantile-based inference in Bayesian models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Nicholas R. Magliocca, 2020. "Agent-Based Modeling for Integrating Human Behavior into the Food–Energy–Water Nexus," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Anja Bauer & Leo Capari & Daniela Fuchs & Titus Udrea, 2023. "Diversification, integration, and opening: developments in modelling for policy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(6), pages 977-987.
    8. Ilaria Pia & Elina Numminen & Lari Veneranta & Jarno Vanhatalo, 2025. "Spatially Explicit Model to Disentangle Effects of Environment on Annual Fish Reproduction," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), March.
    9. Jessica Weinkle, 2022. "An evaluation of North Carolina science advice on COVID-19 pandemic response," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Laurence T. Kell & Rishi Sharma, 2025. "An Evaluation of the Robustness of Length-Based Stock Assessment Approaches for Sustainable Fisheries Management in Data and Capacity Limited Situations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Wen, Xin & Heinisch, Verena & Müller, Jonas & Sasse, Jan-Philipp & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2023. "Comparison of statistical and optimization models for projecting future PV installations at a sub-national scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    12. Brian Hartley, 2022. "Episodic incidence of Harrodian instability and the Kaleckian growth model: A Markov‐switching approach," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 268-290, February.
    13. Andrew J Tanentzap & Samuel Cottingham & Jérémy Fonvielle & Isobel Riley & Lucy M Walker & Samuel G Woodman & Danai Kontou & Christian M Pichler & Erwin Reisner & Laurent Lebreton, 2021. "Microplastics and anthropogenic fibre concentrations in lakes reflect surrounding land use," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Ioannidis, John P.A. & Cripps, Sally & Tanner, Martin A., 2022. "Forecasting for COVID-19 has failed," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 423-438.
    15. Karan Bhuwalka & Eunseo Choi & Elizabeth A. Moore & Richard Roth & Randolph E. Kirchain & Elsa A. Olivetti, 2023. "A hierarchical Bayesian regression model that reduces uncertainty in material demand predictions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 43-55, February.
    16. Malte Knuppel & Fabian Kruger & Marc-Oliver Pohle, 2022. "Score-based calibration testing for multivariate forecast distributions," Papers 2211.16362, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    17. Simon Robertson, 2021. "Transparency, trust, and integrated assessment models: An ethical consideration for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), January.
    18. Leonardo Iacovone & David McKenzie & Rachael Meager, 2025. "Bayesian Impact Evaluation With Informative Priors: An Application to a Colombian Management and Export Improvement Program," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 93(5), pages 1915-1935, September.
    19. Zhuping Liu & Jason A. Duan & Vijay Mahajan, 2025. "Push and pull: Modeling mobile app promotions and consumer responses," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 215-263, June.
    20. repec:osf:osfxxx:fzqxv_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Andrea L Liebl & Jeff S Wesner & Andrew F Russell & Aaron W Schrey, 2021. "Methylation patterns at fledging predict delayed dispersal in a cooperatively breeding bird," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, June.
    22. repec:osf:socarx:h2fxp_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Bernard Baffour & Sumonkanti Das & Mu Li & Alice Richardson, 2024. "The Utility of Socioeconomic and Remoteness Indicators in Understanding the Geographical Variation in the Regional Prevalence of Early Childhood Vulnerability in Australia," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(4), pages 1791-1827, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9383-:d:1777178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.