IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9071-d1770312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Key Factors Influencing the Selection of Sustainable Building Materials in New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Hashemi Araghi

    (School of Built Environment, College of Science, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand)

  • Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed

    (School of Built Environment, College of Science, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand)

  • Vishnupriya Vishnupriya

    (School of Built Environment, College of Science, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand)

  • Jeff Seadon

    (Seadon Consultancy, Auckland 0632, New Zealand)

Abstract

The construction sector is a major contributor to climate change, with embodied carbon emissions from building materials representing a critical share of its environmental footprint. Selecting zero-carbon materials is therefore essential for reducing life-cycle emissions while advancing global climate goals. This study investigates six decision-making factors, including cost-effectiveness, durability, buildability, embodied carbon, availability, and aesthetics, and evaluates four alternative materials (wood, hemp, rammed earth, and straw bale) in the New Zealand context. A survey of 203 industry professionals was analysed using descriptive statistics, one-sample t -tests, and structural equation modelling (SEM). Using a 5-point Likert scale, the survey assessed six factors affecting material choice: cost-effectiveness, durability, buildability, embodied carbon, aesthetics, and material availability. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed using SEM via Partial Least Squares analysis. The results revealed that embodied carbon and material availability were the most influential factors shaping zero-carbon material selection. Among the available alternatives, hemp emerged as the most preferred material, while cost-effectiveness and wood showed moderate impacts, and aesthetic considerations had the least influence. These findings highlight that environmental performance and practical accessibility are central drivers of decision-making when adopting zero-carbon materials. This study contributes to developing effective strategies for promoting the widespread adoption of zero-carbon materials, thereby supporting New Zealand’s progress toward achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and the 2030 Agenda for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Hashemi Araghi & Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed & Vishnupriya Vishnupriya & Jeff Seadon, 2025. "Identifying Key Factors Influencing the Selection of Sustainable Building Materials in New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9071-:d:1770312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9071/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9071/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David A. Finnie & Rehan Masood & Seth Goldsworthy & Benjamin Harding, 2024. "Embodied Carbon in New Zealand Commercial Construction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Qing Yin & Muhan Yu & Xueliang Ma & Ying Liu & Xunzhi Yin, 2023. "The Role of Straw Materials in Energy-Efficient Buildings: Current Perspectives and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Huang, Lizhen & Krigsvoll, Guri & Johansen, Fred & Liu, Yongping & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2018. "Carbon emission of global construction sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1906-1916.
    4. Thao Thi Phuong Bui & Suzanne Wilkinson & Niluka Domingo & Casimir MacGregor, 2021. "Zero Carbon Building Practices in Aotearoa New Zealand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lachlan Curmi & Kumudu Kaushalya Weththasinghe & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, 2022. "Global Policy Review on Embodied Flows: Recommendations for Australian Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Junlong Peng & Zhuo Su & Xiao Liu & Chongsen Ma, 2025. "Promoting Low-Carbonization in the Construction Supply Chain: Key Influencing Factors and Sustainable Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-36, April.
    3. Paul Plachinda & Julia Morgan & Maria Coelho, 2022. "Towards Net Zero: Modeling Approach to the Right-Sized Facilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Zhang, Yanfang & Gao, Qi & Wei, Jinpeng & Shi, Xunpeng & Zhou, Dequn, 2023. "Can China's energy-consumption permit trading scheme achieve the “Porter” effect? Evidence from an estimated DSGE model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    5. Liu, Lirong & Huang, Guohe & Baetz, Brian & Huang, Charley Z. & Zhang, Kaiqiang, 2019. "Integrated GHG emissions and emission relationships analysis through a disaggregated ecologically-extended input-output model; A case study for Saskatchewan, Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 97-109.
    6. Marin Pellan & Denise Almeida & Mathilde Louërat & Guillaume Habert, 2024. "Integrating Consumption-Based Metrics into Sectoral Carbon Budgets to Enhance Sustainability Monitoring of Building Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Pérez-Sánchez, Laura À. & Velasco-Fernández, Raúl & Giampietro, Mario, 2022. "Factors and actions for the sustainability of the residential sector. The nexus of energy, materials, space, and time use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Wenchao Li & Jian Xu & Zhengming Wang & Jialiang Yang, 2020. "The impact of LCTI on China's low-carbon transformation from the spatial spillover perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-11, November.
    9. Yeguan Yu, 2023. "The Impact of Financial System on Carbon Intensity: From the Perspective of Digitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Li, Dezhi & Huang, Guanying & Zhu, Shiyao & Chen, Long & Wang, Jiangbo, 2021. "How to peak carbon emissions of provincial construction industry? Scenario analysis of Jiangsu Province," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    11. Alberto Bezama & Jakob Hildebrandt & Daniela Thrän, 2021. "Integrating Regionalized Socioeconomic Considerations onto Life Cycle Assessment for Evaluating Bioeconomy Value Chains: A Case Study on Hybrid Wood–Concrete Ceiling Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Long Li & Yinting Li, 2022. "The Spatial Relationship between CO 2 Emissions and Economic Growth in the Construction Industry: Based on the Tapio Decoupling Model and STIRPAT Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Mengcheng Li & Haimeng Liu & Shangkun Yu & Jianshi Wang & Yi Miao & Chengxin Wang, 2022. "Estimating the Decoupling between Net Carbon Emissions and Construction Land and Its Driving Factors: Evidence from Shandong Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-26, July.
    14. Senchang Hu & Shaoyi Li & Xiangxin Meng & Yingzheng Peng & Wenzhe Tang, 2023. "Study on Regional Differences of Carbon Emission Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Construction Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Karlsson, Ida & Rootzén, Johan & Johnsson, Filip, 2020. "Reaching net-zero carbon emissions in construction supply chains – Analysis of a Swedish road construction project," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Yunfei Hou & Shouwei Liu, 2024. "Predictive Modeling and Validation of Carbon Emissions from China’s Coastal Construction Industry: A BO-XGBoost Ensemble Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Lisa Stelzer & Friederike Hoberg & Vanessa Bach & Bertram Schmidt & Sven Pfeiffer & Vera Meyer & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Fungal-Based Composite Bricks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat, 2020. "Carbon footprint of construction industry: A global review and supply chain analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    19. Pan, Xiongfeng & Guo, Shucen & Xu, Haitao & Tian, Mengyuan & Pan, Xianyou & Chu, Junhui, 2022. "China's carbon intensity factor decomposition and carbon emission decoupling analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    20. Kevin Nabor Paredes-Canencio & Ana Lasso & Rosaura Castrillon & Juan R. Vidal-Medina & Enrique C. Quispe, 2024. "Carbon footprint of higher education institutions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 30239-30272, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9071-:d:1770312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.