IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8933-d1766952.html

Enhancing Corporate Transparency: AI-Based Detection of Financial Misstatements in Korean Firms Using NearMiss Sampling and Explainable Models

Author

Listed:
  • Woosung Kim

    (Department of Business Administration, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

  • Sooin Kim

    (Department of Business Administration, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Corporate transparency is vital for sustainable governance. However, detecting financial misstatements remains challenging due to their rarity and resulting class imbalance. Using financial statement data from Korean firms, this study develops an integrated AI framework that evaluates the joint effects of sampling strategy, model choice, and interpretability. Across multiple imbalance ratios, NearMiss undersampling consistently outperforms random undersampling—particularly in recall and F1-score—showing that careful data balancing can yield greater improvements than algorithmic complexity alone. To ensure interpretability rests on reliable predictions, we apply Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and Permutation Feature Importance (PFI) only to high-performing models. Logistic regression emphasizes globally influential operating and financing accounts, whereas Random Forest identifies context-dependent patterns such as ownership structure and discretionary spending. Even with a reduced feature set identified by explainable AI, models maintain robust detection performance under low imbalance, highlighting the practical value of interpretability in building simpler and more transparent systems. By combining predictive accuracy with transparency, this study contributes to trustworthy misstatement detection tools that reinforce investor confidence, strengthen responsible corporate governance, and reduce information asymmetry. In doing so, it advances the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions) by supporting fair, accountable, and sustainable economic systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Woosung Kim & Sooin Kim, 2025. "Enhancing Corporate Transparency: AI-Based Detection of Financial Misstatements in Korean Firms Using NearMiss Sampling and Explainable Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8933-:d:1766952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8933/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8933/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Messod D. Beneish, 1999. "The Detection of Earnings Manipulation," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 24-36, September.
    2. Jones, Jj, 1991. "Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 193-228.
    3. Fen-May Liou, 2008. "Fraudulent financial reporting detection and business failure prediction models: a comparison," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(7), pages 650-662, July.
    4. Monica Ramos Montesdeoca & Agustín J. Sánchez Medina & Felix Blázquez Santana, 2019. "Research Topics in Accounting Fraud in the 21st Century: A State of the Art," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, March.
    5. repec:eme:maj000:02686900210424321 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. So-Jin Yu & Jin-Sung Rha, 2021. "Research Trends in Accounting Fraud Using Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    7. repec:eme:maj000:02686900810890625 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Fen‐May Liou, 2008. "Fraudulent financial reporting detection and business failure prediction models: a comparison," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(7), pages 650-662, July.
    9. Lokanan, Mark & Sharma, Satish, 2025. "Reprint of: The use of machine learning algorithms to predict financial statement fraud," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).
    10. Healy, Paul M., 1985. "The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1-3), pages 85-107, April.
    11. Rongyuan Qin & Wei Wang, 2021. "Identification of Accounting Fraud Based on Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression Model," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-11, April.
    12. Charalambos T. Spathis, 2002. "Detecting false financial statements using published data: some evidence from Greece," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(4), pages 179-191, June.
    13. Nhlakanipho Michael Mqadi & Nalindren Naicker & Timothy Adeliyi, 2021. "Solving Misclassification of the Credit Card Imbalance Problem Using Near Miss," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmad Hammami & Mohammad Hendijani Zadeh, 2022. "Predicting earnings management through machine learning ensemble classifiers," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(8), pages 1639-1660, December.
    2. Rajashri Chatterjee & Debdas Rakshit, 2023. "Association Between Earnings Management and Corporate Governance Mechanisms: A Study Based on Select Firms in India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(1), pages 152-170, February.
    3. N. Eriotis & T. Kounadeas & K. Liapis & E. Poutos, 2019. "The Impact of IFRS Adoption by Greek Listed Companies on the Earnings Quality: An Empirical Investigation," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 9(3-4), pages 90-100.
    4. Gropp, Reint E. & Köhler, Matthias, 2010. "Bank owners or bank managers: who is keen on risk? Evidence from the financial crisis," ZEW Discussion Papers 10-013, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. repec:bof:bofrdp:urn:nbn:fi:bof-201508131351 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Akinobu Shuto, 2005. "Earnings Management to Exceed the Threshold: A Comparative Analysis of Consolidated and Parent-only Earnings," Discussion Paper Series 224, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, revised Jul 2008.
    7. Anas Alqudah & Safa Jaradat & Lara Al-Haddad, 2025. "Financial Consequences of Fraud in Amman Stock Exchange Firms," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 29(1), pages 83-111, March.
    8. Sabrina P. Ozawa Gioielli & Antonio Gledson de Carvalho & Joelson Oliveira Sampaio, 2013. "Venture capital and earnings management in IPOs," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 10(4), pages 30-64, October.
    9. Araceli Mora Enguidanos & Juan Manuel García Lara & Beatriz García Osma & Ana Gisbert Clemente, 2004. "La Comparabilidad De La Información Contable En Europa: Efectos De La Manipulación Contable Sobre El Nivel De Conservadurismo," Working Papers. Serie EC 2004-14, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    10. M. Martin Boyer & Elijah Brewer & Willie Reddic, 2019. "The Association between Complexity and Managerial Discretion in the Property and Casualty Insurance Industry," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 1-33, September.
    11. Pascale Lapointe-Antunes & Kevin Veenstra & Kareen Brown & Heather Li, 2022. "Welcome to the Gray Zone: Shades of Honesty and Earnings Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 125-149, April.
    12. Prena Rani & Fazeena Fazneen Hussain & Priyashni Vandana Chand, 2013. "Managerial Incentives For Earnings Management Among Listed Firms: Evidence From Fiji," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(1), pages 21-31.
    13. Isabel‐Maria García‐Sánchez & Nazim Hussain & Sana Akbar Khan & Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero, 2020. "Managerial entrenchment, corporate social responsibility, and earnings management," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1818-1833, July.
    14. Agarwal, Vikas & Daniel, Naveen D. & Naik, Narayan Y., 2009. "Do hedge funds manage their reported returns?," CFR Working Papers 07-09, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    15. Yasmin Jamadar & Tze San Ong & Asna Atqa Abdullah & Fakarudin Kamarudin, 2022. "Earnings and discretionary accruals," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 431-439, March.
    16. Silva, Aldy Fernandes da & Weffort, Elionor Farah Jreige & Flores, Eduardo da Silva & Silva, Glauco Peres da, 2014. "Earnings management and economic crises in the Brazilian capital market," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 54(3), May.
    17. Koray TUAN & Metin BORAK, 2020. "Earnings Management and Financial Performance: An Empirical Investigation of the Istanbul Stock Exchange," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 28(44).
    18. Bo Huang & Haitong Li & Jinghua Lei & Yiqian Wang, 2024. "Free land, heavy burden: Industrial land administrative allocation and local fiscal imbalance in China," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 312-333, March.
    19. Cebi, Selcuk & Karakurt, Necip Fazıl & Kurtulus, Erkan & Tokgoz, Bunyamin, 2024. "Development of a decision support system for client acceptance in independent audit process," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    20. Yu, Fang (Frank), 2008. "Analyst coverage and earnings management," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 245-271, May.
    21. Hadani, Michael & Goranova, Maria & Khan, Raihan, 2011. "Institutional investors, shareholder activism, and earnings management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 1352-1360.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8933-:d:1766952. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.