IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8644-d1758489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep Dive into the Recovery Fund: A (Real) Chance for Inner Areas? The Abruzzo Region Study Case, Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Pilogallo

    (Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis, National Research Council of Italy (IMAA-CNR), c.da S. Loja, 85050 Tito, PZ, Italy)

  • Lucia Saganeiti

    (Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis, National Research Council of Italy (IMAA-CNR), c.da S. Loja, 85050 Tito, PZ, Italy)

  • Lorena Fiorini

    (Department of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, AQ, Italy)

Abstract

The National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) represents a transformative opportunity to reduce territorial, gender and generational disparities in Italy. It plays an even more important role for inner areas, which make up about three-fifths of the entire national territory and require structural investment to improve infrastructure, social services and access to healthcare services. This study aims to analyse the distribution of funds by project type, and to develop a geostatistical analysis-based methodology to critically evaluate two key aspects: the ability of small municipalities to access resources, and the effectiveness of the funding programme in meeting the specific needs of inner areas. The developed methodology consists of several steps aimed at collecting, standardising, geo-spatialising and analysing data relating to NRRP funds. This methodology is then applied to a case study of the Abruzzo region (Italy), which is considered particularly interesting due to its physical, historical and socio-economic characteristics that make it particularly vulnerable to natural disasters. The developed methodology consists of several steps aimed at collecting, standardising, geo-spatialising and analysing data relating to NRRP funds. The results of the spatial autocorrelation and cluster analyses were then overlapped and compared with the internal areas defined by the National Strategy for Inner Areas (NSIA). The outcomes reveal how investments interact with existing spatial planning instruments and development strategies, underscoring the critical role of accessibility, infrastructure, and public services in fostering equitable and sustainable regional development. The analysis offers insights into addressing structural disparities and enhancing territorial cohesion, with implications for policy alignment across multiple levels of governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Pilogallo & Lucia Saganeiti & Lorena Fiorini, 2025. "Deep Dive into the Recovery Fund: A (Real) Chance for Inner Areas? The Abruzzo Region Study Case, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8644-:d:1758489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8644/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8644/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Bachtler & Carlos Mendez & Hildegard Oraže, 2014. "From Conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative Performance and Capacity in Cohesion Policy," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 735-757, April.
    2. Ana Gil Solá & Bertil Vilhelmson, 2018. "Negotiating Proximity in Sustainable Urban Planning: A Swedish Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Giulia Urso & Marco Modica & Alessandra Faggian, 2019. "Resilience and Sectoral Composition Change of Italian Inner Areas in Response to the Great Recession," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Andrea Bonfiglio & Silvia Coderoni & Roberto Esposti & Edoardo Baldoni, 2021. "The role of rurality in determining the economy-wide impacts of a natural disaster," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 446-469, October.
    5. Yu-Feng Wu & A. Fa-you & Cheng Yang & Shi-qun Yan & Xiao-bo Kang & Huaiyu Wang, 2023. "Accuracy Improvement of Different Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Models through K-Means Clustering: A Case Study on China’s Funing County," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2023, pages 1-17, April.
    6. Chiara Chioni & Camilla Pezzica & Sara Favargiotti, 2024. "Territorial Digital Twins: A key for increasing the community resilience of fragile mountain inner territories?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 1548-1563, April.
    7. Paolo Maranzano & Mario Noera & Roberto Romano, 2021. "The European industrial challenge and the Italian NRRP," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 74(298), pages 207-218.
    8. Avgi Vassi & Konstantina Siountri & Kalliopi Papadaki & Alkistis Iliadi & Anna Ypsilanti & Efthimios Bakogiannis, 2022. "The Greek Urban Policy Reform through the Local Urban Plans (LUPs) and the Special Urban Plans (SUPs), Funded by Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Evangelos Asprogerakas & Vasiliki Zachari, 2020. "The EU territorial cohesion discourse and the spatial planning system in Greece," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 583-603, March.
    10. Marco Rossitti & Marta Dell’Ovo & Alessandra Oppio & Francesca Torrieri, 2021. "The Italian National Strategy for Inner Areas (SNAI): A Critical Analysis of the Indicator Grid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Qiaowen Lin & Lu Zhang & Bingkui Qiu & Yi Zhao & Chao Wei, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Land Use Patterns on Carbon Emissions in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    12. Satu Parjanen & Mirva Hyypiä, 2018. "Innovation platforms as a solution to the proximity paradox," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 1312-1329, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Compagnucci, Fabiano & Morettini, Gabriele, 2024. "Inner areas matter: A place-sensitive approach for the identification of the Daily Life Spaces in the Italian Abruzzo region," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. John R. Moodie & Viktor Salenius & Michael Kull, 2022. "From impact assessments towards proactive citizen engagement in EU cohesion policy," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 1113-1132, October.
    3. Ekaterina Domorenok & Paolo Graziano & Laura Polverari, 2021. "Policy integration, policy design and administrative capacities. Evidence from EU cohesion policy [Joined-up Government in the Western World in comparative perspective: A preliminary literature rev," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(1), pages 58-78.
    4. Yu Li & Yanjun Zhang & Xiaoyan Li, 2024. "Insight into Carbon Emissions in Economically Developed Regions Based on Land Use Transitions: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Jie He & Jun Yang, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Land-Use Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Analysis Based on the GTWR Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Luigi Mastronardi & Aurora Cavallo, 2020. "The Spatial Dimension of Income Inequality: An Analysis at Municipal Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Furui Xi & Gang Lin & Yanan Zhao & Xiang Li & Zhiyu Chen & Chenglong Cao, 2023. "Land Use Optimization and Carbon Storage Estimation in the Yellow River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Mingjie Tian & Zhun Chen & Wei Wang & Taizheng Chen & Haiying Cui, 2022. "Land-Use Carbon Emissions in the Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2020: Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Driving Mechanisms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Xiaoping Li & Sai Hu & Lifu Jiang & Bing Han & Jie Li & Xuan Wei, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Patterns and the Development Path of Land-Use Carbon Emissions from a Low-Carbon Perspective: A Case Study of Guizhou Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Pindado, Emilio & Sánchez, Mercedes & García Martínez, Marian, 2023. "Entrepreneurial innovativeness: When too little or too much agglomeration hurts," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    11. Zhenjun Gao & Shujie Li & Xiufeng Cao & Yuefen Li, 2022. "Carbon Emission Intensity Characteristics and Spatial Spillover Effects in Counties in Northeast China: Based on a Spatial Econometric Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Mengcheng Li & Haimeng Liu & Shangkun Yu & Jianshi Wang & Yi Miao & Chengxin Wang, 2022. "Estimating the Decoupling between Net Carbon Emissions and Construction Land and Its Driving Factors: Evidence from Shandong Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-26, July.
    13. Hui Wen & Yi Li & Zirong Li & Xiaoxue Cai & Fengxia Wang, 2022. "Spatial Differentiation of Carbon Budgets and Carbon Balance Zoning in China Based on the Land Use Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Stefania Capecchi & Marcella Corduas & Domenico Piccolo, 2025. "Social Sustainability and Subjective Well-Being: A Study on Italian Inner Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Cerqua, A. & Ferrante, C. & Letta, M., 2021. "Electoral Earthquake: Natural Disasters and the Geography of Discontent," GLO Discussion Paper Series 790, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    16. Grazia Brunetta & Alessandra Faggian & Ombretta Caldarice, 2021. "Bridging the Gap: The Measure of Urban Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-4, January.
    17. Hans Löfsten & Anders Isaksson & Heikki Rannikko, 2023. "Entrepreneurial networks, geographical proximity, and their relationship to firm growth: a study of 241 small high-tech firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 2280-2306, December.
    18. Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano & Lucia Rocchi & Lorenzo Negri & Lea Piscitelli, 2025. "Evaluating the Progress of the EU Countries Towards Implementation of the European Green Deal: A Multiple Criteria Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-29, January.
    19. Maddalena Ferretti & Sara Favargiotti & Barbara Lino & Diana Rolando, 2022. "Branding4Resilience: Explorative and Collaborative Approaches for Inner Territories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-33, September.
    20. Zhaoli Du & Xiaoyu Ren & Weijun Zhao & Chenfei Zhang, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Carbon Emissions from Construction Land and Their Decoupling Effects in the Yellow River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8644-:d:1758489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.