IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8499-d1755200.html

Decoding Multi-Scale Environmental Configurations for Older Adults’ Walkability with Explainable Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Chenxi Su

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350100, China)

  • Zhengyan Chen

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350100, China)

  • Yuxuan Cheng

    (Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney 2007, Australia)

  • Shaofeng Chen

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350100, China)

  • Wenting Li

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350100, China)

  • Zheng Ding

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350100, China)

Abstract

The rapid growth of the aging population, alongside functional decline and more older adults living independently, has increased demand for age-friendly infrastructure and walkable communities. This study proposes a quantitative framework to assess how multi-scale built environments influence older adults’ walkability, addressing the scarcity of scalable and interpretable models in age-friendly urban research. By combining the cumulative opportunity method, street-scene semantic segmentation, XGBoost, and GeoSHapley-based spatial effect analysis, the study finds that (1) significant spatial disparities in walkability exist in Xiamen’s central urban area. Over half of the communities (54.46%) failed to meet the minimum threshold (20 points) within the 15 min community life circle (15-min CLC), indicating inadequate infrastructure. The primary issue is low coverage of older adults’ welfare facilities (only 16.26% of communities are within a 15 min walk). Despite renovations in Jinhu Community, walkability remains low, highlighting persistent disparities. (2) Communities with abundant green space are predominantly newly developed areas (64.06%). However, these areas provide fewer facilities on average (2.3) than older communities (5.7), resulting in a “green space–service mismatch”, where visually appealing environments lack essential services. (3) Human perception variables such as safety, traffic flow, and closure positively influence walkability, while visual complexity, heat risk, exposure, and greenness have negative effects. (4) There is a clear supply and demand mismatch. Central districts combine high walkability with substantial older adults’ service demand. Newly built residential areas in the periphery and north have low density and insufficient pedestrian facilities. They fail to meet daily accessibility needs, revealing delays in age-friendly development. This framework, integrating nonlinear modeling and spatial analysis, reveals spatial non-stationarity and optimal thresholds in how the built environment influences walkability. Beyond methodological contributions, this study offers guidance for planners and policymakers to optimize infrastructure allocation, promote equitable, age-friendly cities, and enhance the health and wellbeing of older residents.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenxi Su & Zhengyan Chen & Yuxuan Cheng & Shaofeng Chen & Wenting Li & Zheng Ding, 2025. "Decoding Multi-Scale Environmental Configurations for Older Adults’ Walkability with Explainable Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-30, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8499-:d:1755200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8499/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8499/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oscar Alvarado, 2025. "Quantifying ecosystem services from trees of an urban park in Amsterdam," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3-4), pages 266-297, May.
    2. Yingzhi Qiu & Yuqi Liu & Yi Liu & Zhigang Li, 2019. "Exploring the Linkage between the Neighborhood Environment and Mental Health in Guangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Ali, Md. Julfikar & Rahaman, Mohidur & Hossain, Sk. Iqbal, 2022. "Urban green spaces for elderly human health: A planning model for healthy city living," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Fernando Alves & Sara Cruz & Anabela Ribeiro & Ana Bastos Silva & João Martins & Inês Cunha, 2020. "Walkability Index for Elderly Health: A Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    5. Pawinee Iamtrakul & Apinya Padon & Sararad Chayphong & Yoshitsugu Hayashi, 2024. "Unlocking Urban Accessibility: Proximity Analysis in Bangkok, Thailand’s Mega City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Zelong Xia & Hao Li & Yuehong Chen, 2018. "Assessing Neighborhood Walkability Based on Usage Characteristics of Amenities under Chinese Metropolises Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Pfiester, Laura Mali & Thompson, Russell G. & Zhang, Lele, 2021. "Spatiotemporal exploration of Melbourne pedestrian demand," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. He, Sylvia Y. & Cheung, Yannie H.Y. & Tao, Sui, 2018. "Travel mobility and social participation among older people in a transit metropolis: A socio-spatial-temporal perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 608-626.
    9. Willberg, Elias & Fink, Christoph & Toivonen, Tuuli, 2023. "The 15-minute city for all? – Measuring individual and temporal variations in walking accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    10. Qing Li & Kaili Peng & Peng Cheng, 2021. "Community-Level Urban Green Space Equity Evaluation Based on Spatial Design Network Analysis (sDNA): A Case Study of Central Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Mengshan Duan & Lizhen Xu & Yongkang Chen & Qun Zhao & Youxing Zhang & Xiangfen Cui & Senlin Tian, 2025. "Optimizing Urban Environments for Sustainable Development: Strategies and Practices to Enhance Mobility Among Older Adults," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-27, April.
    12. Eric J. Miller, 2018. "Accessibility: measurement and application in transportation planning," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 551-555, September.
    13. Singh, Shivendu Shekhar & Sarkar, Basudatta, 2022. "Cumulative opportunity-based accessibility measurement framework in rural India," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 138-151.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Xuan & He, Sylvia Y., 2025. "How does the effect of walkability on walking behavior vary with the time of day? A study of Shenzhen, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Chih-Hao Wang & Na Chen & Craig Olwert, 2024. "Investigating accessibility resilience of emergency and lifesaving facilities under natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(2), pages 1785-1807, January.
    3. Pot, Felix Johan & Koster, Sierdjan & Tillema, Taede, 2023. "Perceived accessibility in Dutch rural areas: Bridging the gap with accessibility based on spatial data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 170-184.
    4. Shi, Kunbo & Shao, Rui & Tao, Yinhua & Cheng, Long & Yang, Tianren, 2025. "Does perceived proximity to urban facilities still matter to individuals' daily activities in the information age?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    5. Rayaprolu, Hema & Levinson, David, 2024. "Co-evolution of public transport access and ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Tammaru, Tiit & Sevtsuk, Andres & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Towards an equity-centred model of sustainable mobility: Integrating inequality and segregation challenges in the green mobility transition," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. Shi Chen & Yi Sun & Bo Kyong Seo, 2022. "The Effects of Public Open Space on Older People’s Well-Being: From Neighborhood Social Cohesion to Place Dependence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Jean Ryan, 2020. "Examining the Process of Modal Choice for Everyday Travel Among Older People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Samuel Heroy & Isabella Loaiza & Alex Pentland & Neave O’Clery, 2023. "Are neighbourhood amenities associated with more walking and less driving? Yes, but predominantly for the wealthy," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(4), pages 958-982, May.
    10. Dan Ma & Hao Yuan, 2021. "Neighborhood Environment, Internet Use and Mental Distress among Older Adults: The Case of Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-12, March.
    11. Rahman, Fabiha & Oliver, Robert & Buehler, Ralph & Lee, Jinhyung & Crawford, Thomas & Kim, Junghwan, 2025. "Impacts of point of interest (POI) data selection on 15-Minute City (15-MC) accessibility scores and inequality assessments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Bartzokas-Tsiompras, Alexandros & Bakogiannis, Efthimios & Nikitas, Alexandros, 2023. "Global microscale walkability ratings and rankings: A novel composite indicator for 59 European city centres," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    13. Renato Soares & Helena Corvacho & Fernando Alves, 2021. "Summer Thermal Conditions in Outdoor Public Spaces: A Case Study in a Mediterranean Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    14. Shih-Lung Shaw, 2023. "Time geography in a hybrid physical–virtual world," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 339-356, July.
    15. Yuhong Tian & Fenghua Liu & Chi Yung Jim & Tiantian Wang & Jingya Luan & Mengxuan Yan, 2022. "Effects of Self-Rated Health Status on Residents’ Social-Benefit Perceptions of Urban Green Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Gabriel Valença & Filipe Moura & Ana Morais de Sá, 2024. "Where is it complex to reallocate road space?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(6), pages 1290-1307, July.
    17. Tianlu Qian & Zheng Fu & Jie Chen & Shujie Qin & Changbai Xi & Jiechen Wang, 2023. "Evaluating multiscale and multimodal transport inequalities in Chinese cities with massive open-source path data," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 237-264, April.
    18. Qing Lu & Jing Ning & Hong You & Liyan Xu, 2023. "Urban Intensity in Theory and Practice: Empirical Determining Mechanism of Floor Area Ratio and Its Deviation from the Classic Location Theories in Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Severin Diepolder & Andrea Araldo & Tarek Chouaki & Santa Maiti & Sebastian Horl & Constantinos Antoniou, 2025. "Quantifying the Improvement of Accessibility achieved via Shared Mobility on Demand," Papers 2507.13100, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2025.
    20. Ryan, Jean & Martens, Karel, 2023. "Defining and implementing a sufficient level of accessibility: What’s stopping us?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8499-:d:1755200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.