IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8409-d1753281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling Gen Z’s Photovoltaic Purchase Intentions: A Mediator–Moderator Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoxiao Li

    (School of International Education, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, 136 Jinshui East Road, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Ming Li

    (School of Management and Economics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, 136 Jinshui East Road, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Pick-Soon Ling

    (School of Business and Management, University of Technology Sarawak, Sibu 96000, Malaysia)

  • Chee-Hua Chin

    (School of Business and Management, University of Technology Sarawak, Sibu 96000, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study aims to explore the significant factors that predicted the purchase intention (PI) of Generation Z (Gen Z) in China on photovoltaics (PV) products. The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) is extended with two exogenous variables (environmental responsibility (ER) and environmental consciousness (EC)) and government support (GS) as a moderator. In the proposed model, three TPB dimensions also serve as mediators. A total of 675 valid responses from Generation Z in China were gathered via purposive sampling and analysed using partial least squares–structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). The findings revealed that subjective norms (SN), perceived behavioural control (PBC), and EC exerted a substantial influence on PI towards PV products. In accordance with the findings, EC has an indirect effect on PI via SN and PBC. In addition, the moderation analysis revealed that GS significantly enhances the relationship between EC and PI. Several important practical implications derived from the findings of the study were discussed, and it could be a useful reference for stakeholders in framing strategies to promote the PI of PV products. This study extends the TPB model by including two possible exogenous variables and examining the moderator and mediator propositions that significantly influence the PI of PV products, based on a comprehensive literature review. The proposed model is envisaged to provide additional evidence on the topic.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoxiao Li & Ming Li & Pick-Soon Ling & Chee-Hua Chin, 2025. "Modelling Gen Z’s Photovoltaic Purchase Intentions: A Mediator–Moderator Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8409-:d:1753281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8409/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8409/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beibei Yue & Guanghua Sheng & Shengxiang She & Jiaqi Xu, 2020. "Impact of Consumer Environmental Responsibility on Green Consumption Behavior in China: The Role of Environmental Concern and Price Sensitivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Wenjie Li & Jiaolan Zhu & Yongchang Li & Yaning Li & Zhikun Ding, 2024. "Determinants of Solar Photovoltaic Adoption Intention among Households: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Suk Min Pang & Booi Chen Tan & Teck Chai Lau, 2021. "Antecedents of Consumers’ Purchase Intention towards Organic Food: Integration of Theory of Planned Behavior and Protection Motivation Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Mauro Viccaro & Adele Coppola & Maria Consiglia D’Angelo & Francesco Genovese & Severino Romano & Mario Cozzi, 2023. "Young People Are Not All the Same! The Theory of Planned Behaviour Applied to Food Waste Behaviour across Young Italian Generations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Yao Song & Zhenzhen Qin & Zihao Qin, 2020. "Green Marketing to Gen Z Consumers in China: Examining the Mediating Factors of an Eco-Label–Informed Purchase," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    7. Syed Shah Alam & Maisarah Ahmad & Yi-Hui Ho & Nor Asiah Omar & Chieh-Yu Lin, 2020. "Applying an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to Sustainable Food Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiaqi Wu & Wenbo Li & Wenting Xu & Lin Yuan, 2023. "Measuring Resident Participation in the Renewal of Older Residential Communities in China under Policy Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Dongming Wu & Liukai Yu & Qianqian Zhang & Yangyang Jiao & Yuhe Wu, 2021. "Materialism, Ecological Consciousness and Purchasing Intention of Electric Vehicles: An Empirical Analysis among Chinese Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Siqi Dai & Kai Chen & Rui Jin, 2022. "The effect of message framing and language intensity on green consumption behavior willingness," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2432-2452, February.
    4. Zhong Zheng & Chalita Srinuan & Nuttawut Rojniruttikul, 2025. "Exploring the Impact of Digital Platform on Energy-Efficient Consumption Behavior: A Multi-Group Analysis of Air Conditioning Purchase in China Using the Extended TPB Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Shanmugavel, Nagarajan & Balakrishnan, Janarthanan, 2023. "Influence of pro-environmental behaviour towards behavioural intention of electric vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Hao Dong & Yang Zhang & Tianqing Chen, 2023. "A Study on Farmers’ Participation in Environmental Protection in the Context of Rural Revitalization: The Moderating Role of Policy Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-13, January.
    7. Helen X. H. Bao & Yuna Song, 2022. "Improving Food Security through Entomophagy: Can Behavioural Interventions Influence Consumer Preference for Edible Insects?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Valentin, Alvin Patrick M. & Hechanova, Ma Regina M., 2023. "Addressing plastic pollution through green consumption: Predicting intentions to use menstrual cups in the Philippines," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Dagna Siuda & Magdalena Grębosz-Krawczyk, 2025. "The Role of Pro-Ecological Packaging in Shaping Purchase Intentions and Brand Image in the Food Sector: An Experimental Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Sharkasi, Nora & De Maeyer, Peter & Lababdi, Houyem chaib & AlMansoori, Salma & Agag, Gomaa, 2025. "A sustainable step forward: Exploring factors influencing the purchase intentions towards remanufactured products using fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Nishant Kumar & Divya Mohan, 2021. "Sustainable apparel purchase intention: collectivist cultural orientation and price sensitivity in extended TPB model," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 149-161, April.
    12. Mausam Budhathoki & Sujita Pandey, 2021. "Intake of Animal-Based Foods and Consumer Behaviour towards Organic Food: The Case of Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Bogdan Nichifor & Luminita Zait & Laura Timiras, 2025. "Drivers, Barriers, and Innovations in Sustainable Food Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-44, March.
    14. Marica Barbaritano & Elisabetta Savelli, 2021. "How Consumer Environmental Responsibility Affects the Purchasing Intention of Design Furniture Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Daoyan Guo & Xinping Wang & Taozhu Feng & Shuai Han, 2022. "Factors Influencing the Waste Separation Behaviors of Urban Residents in Shaanxi Province during the 14th National Games of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Magdalena Grębosz-Krawczyk & Agnieszka Zakrzewska-Bielawska & Sylwia Flaszewska, 2021. "From Words to Deeds: The Impact of Pro-Environmental Self-Identity on Green Energy Purchase Intention," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Catarina Roseira & Sandrina Teixeira & Belem Barbosa & Rita Macedo, 2022. "How Collectivism Affects Organic Food Purchase Intention and Behavior: A Study with Norwegian and Portuguese Young Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Salem, Mohammed Z. & Ertz, Myriam & Sarigӧllü, Emine, 2021. "Demarketing strategies to rationalize electricity consumption in the Gaza Strip-Palestine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    19. Nagarajan Shanmugavel & Rema Rajendran, 2022. "Adoption of Rainwater Harvesting: a Dual-factor Approach by Integrating Theory of Planned Behaviour and Norm Activation Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(8), pages 2827-2845, June.
    20. Fagang Hu & Shufen Zhang & Yaliu Yang & Kun Wang, 2023. "Analysis of Consumers’ Green Consumption Behavior against the Background of “Carbon Peak, Carbon Neutrality”—Based on Survey Data from Anhui Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8409-:d:1753281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.