IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8251-d1749161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing and Validating a Data-Driven Application for Street-Accessible Urban Bench Analysis and Planning to Support Evidence-Based Decision Making in Age-Friendly, Sustainable Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Ptak-Wojciechowska

    (Faculty of Architecture, Institute of Architecture and Heritage Protection, Poznan University of Technology, ul. Jacka Rychlewskiego 2, 61-131 Poznan, Poland)

  • Agata Gawlak

    (Faculty of Architecture, Institute of Architecture and Heritage Protection, Poznan University of Technology, ul. Jacka Rychlewskiego 2, 61-131 Poznan, Poland)

  • Patryk Maciejewski

    (Faculty of Computing and Telecommunication, Institute of Computing Science, Poznan University of Technology, ul. Piotrowo 2, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Dmytro Romaniv

    (Faculty of Computing and Telecommunication, Institute of Computing Science, Poznan University of Technology, ul. Piotrowo 2, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Michał Skrzypek

    (Faculty of Computing and Telecommunication, Institute of Computing Science, Poznan University of Technology, ul. Piotrowo 2, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Dariusz Brzeziński

    (Faculty of Computing and Telecommunication, Institute of Computing Science, Poznan University of Technology, ul. Piotrowo 2, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Jerzy Stefanowski

    (Faculty of Computing and Telecommunication, Institute of Computing Science, Poznan University of Technology, ul. Piotrowo 2, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

Ageing societies place new demands on urban spaces, such as aligning with the 15 min city concept prominent in the European Union’s strategies for urban planning. Promoting the idea of a supportive open public space for all, reducing inequalities, and improving health and well-being are considerations in line with Sustainable Development Goals. However, achieving accessible environments requires focusing on specific needs, such as street infrastructure for seniors, and urban benches are crucial for enhancing older adults’ mobility and societal participation, yet their placement often lacks systematic analysis. In this study, we address the above gap by developing a data-driven application that allows users to analyse bench locations and spacing along city streets. Our case studies from selected European cities show that current bench distributions along streets frequently deviate from designated good practices. The results of these case studies can serve as references for other cities around the world and provide insights into developing new standards. With the proposed tool, users can not only visualise the current level of street age-friendliness in terms of urban benches, but also potentially simulate future urban bench location scenarios, supporting evidence-based decision making by city authorities worldwide, thus promoting more sustainable cities and communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Ptak-Wojciechowska & Agata Gawlak & Patryk Maciejewski & Dmytro Romaniv & Michał Skrzypek & Dariusz Brzeziński & Jerzy Stefanowski, 2025. "Developing and Validating a Data-Driven Application for Street-Accessible Urban Bench Analysis and Planning to Support Evidence-Based Decision Making in Age-Friendly, Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8251-:d:1749161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8251/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8251/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moniruzzaman, Md & Páez, Antonio, 2016. "An investigation of the attributes of walkable environments from the perspective of seniors in Montreal," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 85-96.
    2. Yuxin Cao & Chye Kiang Heng & John Chye Fung, 2019. "Using Walk-Along Interviews to Identify Environmental Factors Influencing Older Adults’ Out-of-Home Behaviors in a High-Rise, High-Density Neighborhood," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Katherine Brookfield & Sara Tilley, 2016. "Using Virtual Street Audits to Understand the Walkability of Older Adults’ Route Choices by Gender and Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, October.
    4. Katherine Brookfield & Catharine Ward Thompson & Iain Scott, 2017. "The Uncommon Impact of Common Environmental Details on Walking in Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-10, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yongcheng & Wong, Yiik Diew & Du, Bo & Lum, Kit Meng & Goh, Kelvin, 2024. "Sociospatial inclusiveness of streets through the lens of urban pedestrian mobilities: Go-along interviews with less mobile pedestrians in Singapore," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    2. Marcia G. Ory & Matthew Lee Smith, 2017. "What If Healthy Aging Is the ‘New Normal’?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-5, November.
    3. Sadiq R. Younes & Bruno Marques & Jacqueline McIntosh, 2024. "Public Spaces for Older People: A Review of the Relationship between Public Space to Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Yang, Yongjiang & Sasaki, Kuniaki & Cheng, Long & Tao, Sui, 2022. "Does the built environment matter for active travel among older adults: Insights from Chiba City, Japan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Elise Desjardins & Christopher D. Higgins & Darren M. Scott & Emma Apatu & Antonio Páez, 2022. "Correlates of bicycling trip flows in Hamilton, Ontario: fastest, quietest, or balanced routes?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 867-895, June.
    6. Cheng, Long & Shi, Kunbo & De Vos, Jonas & Cao, Mengqiu & Witlox, Frank, 2021. "Examining the spatially heterogeneous effects of the built environment on walking among older adults," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 21-30.
    7. Delso, Javier & Martín, Belén & Ortega, Emilio, 2018. "A new procedure using network analysis and kernel density estimations to evaluate the effect of urban configurations on pedestrian mobility. The case study of Vitoria –Gasteiz," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 61-72.
    8. Liu, Yanan & Yang, Dujuan & Timmermans, Harry J.P. & de Vries, Bauke, 2020. "Analysis of the impact of street-scale built environment design near metro stations on pedestrian and cyclist road segment choice: A stated choice experiment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    9. Ka-Man Leung & Kai-Ling Ou & Pak-Kwong Chung & Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani, 2021. "Older Adults’ Perceptions toward Walking: A Qualitative Study Using a Social-Ecological Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Wyatt A. Jensen & Barbara B. Brown & Ken R. Smith & Simon C. Brewer & Jonathan W. Amburgey & Brett McIff, 2017. "Active Transportation on a Complete Street: Perceived and Audited Walkability Correlates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Marica Cassarino & Eleanor Bantry-White & Annalisa Setti, 2019. "Cognitive and Sensory Dimensions of Older People’s Preferences of Outdoor Spaces for Walking: A Survey Study in Ireland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-12, April.
    12. D'Orso, Gabriele & Migliore, Marco, 2020. "A GIS-based method for evaluating the walkability of a pedestrian environment and prioritised investments," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    13. Lieu, Seung Jae & Guhathakurta, Subhrajit, 2025. "Exploring pedestrian route choice preferences by demographic groups: Analysis of street attributes in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    14. Yuhan Shao & Yuting Yin & Zhenying Xue & Dongbo Ma, 2023. "Assessing and Comparing the Visual Comfort of Streets across Four Chinese Megacities Using AI-Based Image Analysis and the Perceptive Evaluation Method," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Ziwen Sun & Ka Yan Lai & Simon Bell & Iain Scott & Xiaomeng Zhang, 2019. "Exploring the Associations of Walking Behavior with Neighborhood Environments by Different Life Stages: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Smaller Chinese City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Lanjing Wang & Chunli Zhao & Xiaofei Liu & Xumei Chen & Chaoyang Li & Tao Wang & Jiani Wu & Yi Zhang, 2021. "Non-Linear Effects of the Built Environment and Social Environment on Bus Use among Older Adults in China: An Application of the XGBoost Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Valkiria Amaya & Thibauld Moulaert & Luc Gwiazdzinski & Nicolas Vuillerme, 2022. "Assessing and Qualifying Neighborhood Walkability for Older Adults: Construction and Initial Testing of a Multivariate Spatial Accessibility Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Chen, Zhiheng & Li, Peiran & Jin, YanXiu & Bharule, Shreyas & Jia, Ning & Li, Wenjing & Song, Xuan & Shibasaki, Ryosuke & Zhang, Haoran, 2023. "Using mobile phone big data to identify inequity of aging groups in transit-oriented development station usage: A case of Tokyo," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 65-75.
    19. Maite Adames Torres & Hye Won Oh & Jeongwoo Lee, 2022. "The Built Environment and Children’s Active Commuting to School: A Case Study of San Pedro De Macoris, the Dominican Republic," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Thu T. Nguyen & Quynh C. Nguyen & Anna D. Rubinsky & Tolga Tasdizen & Amir Hossein Nazem Deligani & Pallavi Dwivedi & Ross Whitaker & Jessica D. Fields & Mindy C. DeRouen & Heran Mane & Courtney R. Ly, 2021. "Google Street View-Derived Neighborhood Characteristics in California Associated with Coronary Heart Disease, Hypertension, Diabetes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-13, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8251-:d:1749161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.