Author
Listed:
- Junhua Zhang
(College of Surveying and Geo-Information, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Xiaodan Yun
(School of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Yaohong Yang
(School of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Ran Jing
(School of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Wenchao Jin
(Construction Administration Bureau of the Xixiayuan Water Control Complex Water Conveyance and Irrigation Project, Zhengzhou 450000, China)
Abstract
In the current soil erosion control efforts, the lack of collaboration among multiple stakeholders is a major problem that restricts governance performance. Based on carbon trading and the Public–Private Partnership model, this paper constructs a tripartite differential game model involving the government, enterprises, and farmers, focusing on the government subsidy and the enterprise–farmer benefit-sharing mechanism. It systematically analyzes the dynamic evolution process of multi-stakeholder collaborative governance behavior under the collaborative mechanism. Through numerical simulation, the impacts of key variables such as benefit-sharing ratio, synergy effect of measures, and unit carbon sequestration on the optimization of enterprise governance measures, effort level, government fiscal expenditure, and tripartite benefits were analyzed. The results indicate that (1) the benefit-sharing ratio has a significant bidirectional regulatory effect on the system, with both excessively high and excessively low ratios weakening the collaborative governance effect; (2) the synergistic effect between governance measures significantly enhances the enthusiasm of enterprise governance and promotes the allocation of resources towards measure with better carbon sequestration benefits; and (3) the unit carbon sequestration significantly affects governance structure and government subsidy strategies, with the government being more sensitive to carbon sink responses of afforestation measures. The research results provide a theoretical basis for optimizing the ecological governance system under the “dual carbon” goal and also provide policy references for promoting the transformation of governance model from “government-led” to “multi-stakeholder collaboration”.
Suggested Citation
Junhua Zhang & Xiaodan Yun & Yaohong Yang & Ran Jing & Wenchao Jin, 2025.
"Collaborative Mechanism of Soil and Water Ecological Governance Under Public–Private Partnership Model Considering Carbon Trading,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-31, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8064-:d:1744289
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8064-:d:1744289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.