IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7800-d1737698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association of Urban Form, Neighbourhood Characteristics, and Socioeconomic Factors with Travel Behaviour in Windhoek, Namibia

Author

Listed:
  • Hilma Nuuyandja

    (Department of Transport and Supply Chain Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Noleen Pisa

    (Department of Transport and Supply Chain Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Houshmand Masoumi

    (Department of Transport and Supply Chain Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa
    Center for Technology and Society, Technische Universität Berlin, 10553 Berlin, Germany)

  • Chengete Chakamera

    (Department of Transport and Supply Chain Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

Abstract

This paper investigates the associations between urban form, neighbourhood characteristics, socioeconomic factors and commuting mode choice and neighbourhood-level active travel (walking and cycling) in Windhoek, Namibia. Despite growing interest in sustainable mobility, limited research has examined these relationships in medium-sized African cities, particularly in distinguishing between commuting and neighbourhood travel behaviour. To address this gap, the study explores three interrelated research questions: (1) In what ways are urban form, accessibility, and socioeconomic factors associated with residents’ choices between motorised and non-motorised commuting modes? (2) What factors determine the propensity of cycling within neighbourhoods? (3) How are similar factors associated with walking propensity at the neighbourhood level? Using survey data from 1000 residents across nine constituencies and spatial analysis through GIS, the study applies binary logistic and multiple linear regression models to analyse commuting and local travel patterns. The findings show that commuting mode choice is significantly associated with socioeconomic status, car ownership, commuting time, and urban sprawl around homes, all of which reduce the likelihood of walking or cycling. Neighbourhood walking, in contrast, is largely driven by necessity in underserved, high-density areas and is positively associated with population density, perceived safety, and community belonging but constrained by inadequate infrastructure and car access. Cycling, though less frequent, is associated with perceived security, access to local amenities, and cycling competence, while negatively constrained by inexperience and cultural norms. The study concludes that fragmented urban form and socioeconomic disparities reinforce mobility exclusion and calls for equity-oriented transport planning that integrates infrastructure and behavioural change.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilma Nuuyandja & Noleen Pisa & Houshmand Masoumi & Chengete Chakamera, 2025. "Association of Urban Form, Neighbourhood Characteristics, and Socioeconomic Factors with Travel Behaviour in Windhoek, Namibia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-27, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7800-:d:1737698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7800/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7800/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rahul Goel & Anna Goodman & Rachel Aldred & Ryota Nakamura & Lambed Tatah & Leandro Martin Totaro Garcia & Belen Zapata-Diomedi & Thiago Herick de Sa & Geetam Tiwari & Audrey de Nazelle & Marko Tainio, 2022. "Cycling behaviour in 17 countries across 6 continents: levels of cycling, who cycles, for what purpose, and how far?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 58-81, January.
    2. Ralph Buehler & John Pucher & Regine Gerike & Thomas Götschi, 2017. "Reducing car dependence in the heart of Europe: lessons from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 4-28, January.
    3. Houshmand Masoumi & Grzegorz Sierpiński, 2022. "The Land Use and Individual Correlates of Pedestrian Commuting: Who Walks to Their Work or Place of Study in the Large Cities of the MENA Region?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Circella, Giovanni & Alemi, Farzad & Tiedeman, Kate & Handy, Susan & Mokhtarian, Patricia, 2018. "The Adoption of Shared Mobility in California and Its Relationship with Other Components of Travel Behavior," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1kq5d07p, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    5. Dorsa Alipour & Hussein Dia, 2023. "A Systematic Review of the Role of Land Use, Transport, and Energy-Environment Integration in Shaping Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    6. Jonas De Vos & E. Owen D. Waygood & Laurence Letarte & Mengqiu Cao, 2022. "Do frequent satisfying trips by public transport impact its intended use in later life?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1245-1263, August.
    7. Ton, Danique & Duives, Dorine C. & Cats, Oded & Hoogendoorn-Lanser, Sascha & Hoogendoorn, Serge P., 2019. "Cycling or walking? Determinants of mode choice in the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 7-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonie Tuitjer & Kerstin J. Schaefer, 2025. "Immobility and COVID-19: comparing mobility reduction among socio-demographic groups in a large German city during the pandemic," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 669-692, April.
    2. Nabipour, Mohammad & Rosenberg, Mark W. & Nasseri, Seyed Hadi, 2022. "The built environment, networks design, and safety features: An analysis of pedestrian commuting behavior in intermediate-sized cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 14-23.
    3. Gu, Tianqi & Kim, Inhi & Currie, Graham, 2019. "To be or not to be dockless: Empirical analysis of dockless bikeshare development in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 122-147.
    4. Sabogal-Cardona, Orlando & Dávila, Julio D. & Oviedo, Daniel, 2025. "Lycra and guardian angels: Can leisure cycling induce travel behaviour changes?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    5. Nataša Kovačić & Hrvoje Grofelnik, 2025. "Predictors of Sustainable Student Mobility in a Suburban Setting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Ton, Danique & Duives, Dorine, 2021. "Understanding long-term changes in commuter mode use of a pilot featuring free e-bike trials," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 134-144.
    7. Mengwei Chen & Dianhai Wang & Yilin Sun & E. Owen D. Waygood & Wentao Yang, 2020. "A comparison of users’ characteristics between station-based bikesharing system and free-floating bikesharing system: case study in Hangzhou, China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 689-704, April.
    8. Alexandros Nikitas, 2019. "How to Save Bike-Sharing: An Evidence-Based Survival Toolkit for Policy-Makers and Mobility Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Ong, Felita & Loa, Patrick & Nurul Habib, Khandker, 2024. "Ride-sourcing demand in Metro Vancouver: Looking through the lens of disability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    10. Theresa Kotulla & Jon Martin Denstadli & Are Oust & Elisabeth Beusker, 2019. "What Does It Take to Make the Compact City Liveable for Wider Groups? Identifying Key Neighbourhood and Dwelling Features," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Timmons, Shane & Andersson, Ylva & McGowan, Féidhlim & Lunn, Pete, 2023. "Using behavioural science to design and implement active travel infrastructure: A narrative review of evidence," Papers WP745, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    12. Yu, Haitao & Peng, Zhong-Ren, 2019. "Exploring the spatial variation of ridesourcing demand and its relationship to built environment and socioeconomic factors with the geographically weighted Poisson regression," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 147-163.
    13. Zhang, Wenqing & Liu, Liangliang, 2022. "Exploring non-users' intention to adopt ride-sharing services: Taking into account increased risks due to the COVID-19 pandemic among other factors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 180-195.
    14. Hrelja, Robert, 2019. "Cars. Problematisations, measures and blind spots in local transport and land use policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Ton, Danique & Bekhor, Shlomo & Cats, Oded & Duives, Dorine C. & Hoogendoorn-Lanser, Sascha & Hoogendoorn, Serge P., 2020. "The experienced mode choice set and its determinants: Commuting trips in the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 744-758.
    16. Yiyuan Wang & Qing Shen, 2024. "A latent class analysis to understand riders’ adoption of on-demand mobility services as a complement to transit," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1043-1061, June.
    17. Stefan Arens & Sunke Schlüters & Benedikt Hanke & Karsten von Maydell & Carsten Agert, 2020. "Sustainable Residential Energy Supply: A Literature Review-Based Morphological Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, January.
    18. O'Driscoll, Conor & Crowley, Frank & Doran, Justin & McCarthy, Nóirín, 2022. "Retail sprawl and CO2 emissions: Retail centres in Irish cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    19. Echeverría, Lucía & Giménez-Nadal, J. Ignacio & Alberto Molina, José, 2022. "Who uses green mobility? Exploring profiles in developed countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 247-265.
    20. Luzzati, Tommaso & Orsini, Marco & Gucciardi, Gianluca, 2018. "A multiscale reassessment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve for energy and CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 612-621.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7800-:d:1737698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.