IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7770-d1737021.html

Integrating Circular Economy (CE) Principles into Construction Waste Management (CWM) Through Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM)

Author

Listed:
  • Thilina Ganganath Weerakoon

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Janis Zvirgzdins

    (Economics and Business Institute, Riga Technical University, 6 Kalnciema Str., LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

  • Sanda Lapuke

    (Economics and Business Institute, Riga Technical University, 6 Kalnciema Str., LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

  • Sulaksha Wimalasena

    (Economics and Business Institute, Riga Technical University, 6 Kalnciema Str., LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

  • Peteris Drukis

    (Civil Engineering Institute, Riga Technical University, 6A Kipsalas Str., LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

Abstract

The construction sector is a major contributor to global waste output, with construction and demolition waste (CDW) producing substantial environmental, economic, and logistical challenges. Traditional methods for handling waste in developing countries have failed to implement sustainability concepts successfully, resulting in inefficient resource consumption and increasing landfill reliance. This study develops an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework to integrate circular economy (CE) principles into construction waste management (CWM). The framework evaluates four criteria under economic, environmental, social, and technological categorization and applies expert-based pairwise comparisons to prioritize alternative strategies. To ensure reliability, the results were further validated through sensitivity analysis and cross-validation using complementary MCDM methods, including the TOPSIS, WSM, and WPM. The research attempted to determine the most successful waste management approach by examining critical economic, social, technical, and environmental issues in the setting of Sri Lanka as a case study. A hierarchical model was built, and expert views were gathered using pairwise comparisons to assess the relative importance of each criterion. The results showed that environmental considerations had the greatest relative importance (41.6%), followed by economic (38.4%), technical (12.6%), and social aspects (7.4%). On-site waste segregation appeared as the most suitable method owing to its immediate contribution to sustainability, while off-site treatment, prefabrication, modular construction, and waste-to-energy conversion followed. The research underlines the significance of organized decision-making in waste management and advises incorporating real-time data analytics and artificial intelligence to boost adaptable and sustainable construction practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Thilina Ganganath Weerakoon & Janis Zvirgzdins & Sanda Lapuke & Sulaksha Wimalasena & Peteris Drukis, 2025. "Integrating Circular Economy (CE) Principles into Construction Waste Management (CWM) Through Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7770-:d:1737021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7770/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7770/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fan Zhang & Yanbing Ju & Ernesto D.R. Santibanez Gonzalez & Aihua Wang & Peiwu Dong & Mihalis Giannakis, 2021. "Evaluation of construction and demolition waste utilization schemes under uncertain environment: A fuzzy heterogeneous multi-criteria decision-making approach," Post-Print hal-03320128, HAL.
    2. Dongchen Han & Mohsen Kalantari & Abbas Rajabifard, 2021. "Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Australia: A Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Li, Zeyang & Luan, Weixin & Zhang, Zhenchao & Su, Min, 2020. "Relationship between urban construction land expansion and population/economic growth in Liaoning Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Noushin Islam & Malindu Sandanayake & Shobha Muthukumaran & Dimuth Navaratna, 2024. "Review on Sustainable Construction and Demolition Waste Management—Challenges and Research Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-30, April.
    5. He, Qingsong & Xu, Min & Xu, Zike & Ye, Yanmei & Shu, Xianfan & Xie, Peng & Wu, Jiayu, 2019. "Promotion incentives, infrastructure construction, and industrial landscapes in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Xin Du & Hengming Zhang & Yawen Han, 2022. "How Does New Infrastructure Investment Affect Economic Growth Quality? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-30, March.
    7. Zezhou Wu & Ann T. W. Yu & Yigang Wei, 2015. "Predicting Contractor’s Behavior Toward Construction and Demolition Waste Management," Springer Books, in: Liyin Shen & Kunhui Ye & Chao Mao (ed.), Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 869-875, Springer.
    8. Aguarón, Juan & Escobar, María Teresa & Moreno-Jiménez, José María, 2021. "Reducing inconsistency measured by the geometric consistency index in the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 576-583.
    9. Martina Novotná & Ivana Faltová Leitmanová & Jiří Alina & Tomáš Volek, 2020. "Capital Intensity and Labour Productivity in Waste Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Léa Tardieu & Sébastien Roussel & John Thompson & Dorothée Labarraque & Jean-Michel Salles, 2015. "Combining direct and indirect impacts to assess ecosystem service loss due to infrastructure construction," Post-Print hal-01945826, HAL.
    11. Stefan Schützenhofer & Iva Kovacic & Helmut Rechberger & Stephanie Mack, 2022. "Improvement of Environmental Sustainability and Circular Economy through Construction Waste Management for Material Reuse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Stupnikova & Tatyana Sukhadolets, 2019. "Construction Sector Role in Gross Fixed Capital Formation: Empirical Data from Russia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Amir, Muhammad Sikander & Ali, Amjad & Audi, Marc, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence Investment and Firm Profitability: Evidence from Pakistan’s Financial and Audit Sectors," MPRA Paper 127314, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Cristian Savu & Adrian-Horatiu Pescaru & Ivett-Greta Zsak & Anca-Maria Durgheu & Alexandra-Paula Frent & Norbert-Szabolcs Suba & Aurelian Stelian Buda & Sorin Nistor, 2024. "Analysis on Using 3D Scanning and BIM to Reduce the Physical and Non-Physical Construction Waste for Sustainable Fireproofing of Steel Trusses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Lin, Boqiang & Zhou, Yicheng, 2021. "How does vertical fiscal imbalance affect the upgrading of industrial structure? Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Despina Gavresi & Anastasia Litina & George Tsiachtsiras, 2022. "Railways and Roadways to Trust," Discussion Paper Series 2022_08, Department of Economics, University of Macedonia, revised Sep 2022.
    6. Junwu Wang & Yinghui Song & Wei Wang & Suikuan Wang & Feng Guo & Jiequn Lu, 2022. "Marine Construction Waste Recycling Mechanism Considering Public Participation and Carbon Trading: A Study on Dynamic Modeling and Simulation Based on Sustainability Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Jiangsu Li & Weihua Li & Bo Li & Liangrong Duan & Tianjiao Zhang & Qi Jia, 2022. "Construction Land Expansion of Resource-Based Cities in China: Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Driving Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Amjad Almusaed & Ibrahim Yitmen & Asaad Almssad, 2023. "Reviewing and Integrating AEC Practices into Industry 6.0: Strategies for Smart and Sustainable Future-Built Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.
    9. Yi Zeng & Tashi Lobsang & Xingyun Luo & Zhengxin Zhang & Hengyi Yang & Xiaoqing Zhao, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Decoupling Effects of Urban Construction Land Expansion in Plateau Basins," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Mona Salah & Emad Elbeltagi & Meshal Almoshaogeh & Fawaz Alharbi & Mohamed T. Elnabwy, 2025. "Identifying Root Causes and Sustainable Solutions for Reducing Construction Waste Using Social Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-27, August.
    11. Song, Min & Yi, Luping & Hu, Can, 2023. "Building up a compensation-oriented transferable development right mechanism: A theoretical and empirical exploration in Hubei, China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Mengqi Zhao & Ziyao Wang & Liang Li, 2026. "Carbon sequestration service supply–demand dynamics in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration: implications from future SSP–RCP scenarios," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Xiaohua Gu & Yanwei Zhu & Siwen Liu & Shangwen Zhu & Yan Liu, 2022. "Preparation of Mullite/PU Nanocomposites by Double Waste Co-Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Harry Ngobile & Dr Kelvin Lungu, 2026. "Optimizing Cost and Project Management in Zambia’s Mining Infrastructure Projects: A Case of Lubambe Copper Mine Limited," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(2), pages 7578-7608, February.
    15. Albérico Travassos Rosário & Joana Carmo Dias, 2023. "The New Digital Economy and Sustainability: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    16. Qiuguang Hu & Weiteng Shen, 2021. "Effects of Industrial Land Conveyance on Coastal Marine Pollution: An Spatial Durbin Econometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    17. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:14:p:3024-3029 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Qing Wang & Yuhang Xiao, 2022. "Has Urban Construction Land Achieved Low-Carbon Sustainable Development? A Case Study of North China Plain, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, August.
    19. Shanping Wang & Peng Cao & Xiao Ouyang, 2024. "Nonlinear influence of construction land on poverty reduction efficiency in Chinese poor counties: new evidence using a panel threshold model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 3557-3587, February.
    20. Sofia Corradini & Stefania Funari & Silvio Giove, 2026. "An Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework for artist ranking: evidence from an art gallery in Italy," Working Papers 2026: 15, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    21. Zeyang Li & Weixin Luan & Zhenchao Zhang & Min Su, 2023. "Research on the Interactive Relationship of Spatial Expansion between Estuarine and Coastal Port Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7770-:d:1737021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.