IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7770-d1737021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Circular Economy (CE) Principles into Construction Waste Management (CWM) Through Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM)

Author

Listed:
  • Thilina Ganganath Weerakoon

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Janis Zvirgzdins

    (Economics and Business Institute, Riga Technical University, 6 Kalnciema Str., LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

  • Sanda Lapuke

    (Economics and Business Institute, Riga Technical University, 6 Kalnciema Str., LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

  • Sulaksha Wimalasena

    (Economics and Business Institute, Riga Technical University, 6 Kalnciema Str., LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

  • Peteris Drukis

    (Civil Engineering Institute, Riga Technical University, 6A Kipsalas Str., LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

Abstract

The construction sector is a major contributor to global waste output, with construction and demolition waste (CDW) producing substantial environmental, economic, and logistical challenges. Traditional methods for handling waste in developing countries have failed to implement sustainability concepts successfully, resulting in inefficient resource consumption and increasing landfill reliance. This study develops an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework to integrate circular economy (CE) principles into construction waste management (CWM). The framework evaluates four criteria under economic, environmental, social, and technological categorization and applies expert-based pairwise comparisons to prioritize alternative strategies. To ensure reliability, the results were further validated through sensitivity analysis and cross-validation using complementary MCDM methods, including the TOPSIS, WSM, and WPM. The research attempted to determine the most successful waste management approach by examining critical economic, social, technical, and environmental issues in the setting of Sri Lanka as a case study. A hierarchical model was built, and expert views were gathered using pairwise comparisons to assess the relative importance of each criterion. The results showed that environmental considerations had the greatest relative importance (41.6%), followed by economic (38.4%), technical (12.6%), and social aspects (7.4%). On-site waste segregation appeared as the most suitable method owing to its immediate contribution to sustainability, while off-site treatment, prefabrication, modular construction, and waste-to-energy conversion followed. The research underlines the significance of organized decision-making in waste management and advises incorporating real-time data analytics and artificial intelligence to boost adaptable and sustainable construction practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Thilina Ganganath Weerakoon & Janis Zvirgzdins & Sanda Lapuke & Sulaksha Wimalasena & Peteris Drukis, 2025. "Integrating Circular Economy (CE) Principles into Construction Waste Management (CWM) Through Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7770-:d:1737021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7770/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7770/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noushin Islam & Malindu Sandanayake & Shobha Muthukumaran & Dimuth Navaratna, 2024. "Review on Sustainable Construction and Demolition Waste Management—Challenges and Research Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Aguarón, Juan & Escobar, María Teresa & Moreno-Jiménez, José María, 2021. "Reducing inconsistency measured by the geometric consistency index in the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 576-583.
    3. Dongchen Han & Mohsen Kalantari & Abbas Rajabifard, 2021. "Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Australia: A Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Martina Novotná & Ivana Faltová Leitmanová & Jiří Alina & Tomáš Volek, 2020. "Capital Intensity and Labour Productivity in Waste Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Stefan Schützenhofer & Iva Kovacic & Helmut Rechberger & Stephanie Mack, 2022. "Improvement of Environmental Sustainability and Circular Economy through Construction Waste Management for Material Reuse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Fan Zhang & Yanbing Ju & Ernesto D.R. Santibanez Gonzalez & Aihua Wang & Peiwu Dong & Mihalis Giannakis, 2021. "Evaluation of construction and demolition waste utilization schemes under uncertain environment: A fuzzy heterogeneous multi-criteria decision-making approach," Post-Print hal-03320128, HAL.
    7. Li, Zeyang & Luan, Weixin & Zhang, Zhenchao & Su, Min, 2020. "Relationship between urban construction land expansion and population/economic growth in Liaoning Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Léa Tardieu & Sébastien Roussel & John Thompson & Dorothée Labarraque & Jean-Michel Salles, 2015. "Combining direct and indirect impacts to assess ecosystem service loss due to infrastructure construction," Post-Print hal-01945826, HAL.
    9. He, Qingsong & Xu, Min & Xu, Zike & Ye, Yanmei & Shu, Xianfan & Xie, Peng & Wu, Jiayu, 2019. "Promotion incentives, infrastructure construction, and industrial landscapes in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Xin Du & Hengming Zhang & Yawen Han, 2022. "How Does New Infrastructure Investment Affect Economic Growth Quality? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-30, March.
    11. Zezhou Wu & Ann T. W. Yu & Yigang Wei, 2015. "Predicting Contractor’s Behavior Toward Construction and Demolition Waste Management," Springer Books, in: Liyin Shen & Kunhui Ye & Chao Mao (ed.), Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 869-875, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristian Savu & Adrian-Horatiu Pescaru & Ivett-Greta Zsak & Anca-Maria Durgheu & Alexandra-Paula Frent & Norbert-Szabolcs Suba & Aurelian Stelian Buda & Sorin Nistor, 2024. "Analysis on Using 3D Scanning and BIM to Reduce the Physical and Non-Physical Construction Waste for Sustainable Fireproofing of Steel Trusses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Junwu Wang & Yinghui Song & Wei Wang & Suikuan Wang & Feng Guo & Jiequn Lu, 2022. "Marine Construction Waste Recycling Mechanism Considering Public Participation and Carbon Trading: A Study on Dynamic Modeling and Simulation Based on Sustainability Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Yi Zeng & Tashi Lobsang & Xingyun Luo & Zhengxin Zhang & Hengyi Yang & Xiaoqing Zhao, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Decoupling Effects of Urban Construction Land Expansion in Plateau Basins," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Mona Salah & Emad Elbeltagi & Meshal Almoshaogeh & Fawaz Alharbi & Mohamed T. Elnabwy, 2025. "Identifying Root Causes and Sustainable Solutions for Reducing Construction Waste Using Social Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Song, Min & Yi, Luping & Hu, Can, 2023. "Building up a compensation-oriented transferable development right mechanism: A theoretical and empirical exploration in Hubei, China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Albérico Travassos Rosário & Joana Carmo Dias, 2023. "The New Digital Economy and Sustainability: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Qing Wang & Yuhang Xiao, 2022. "Has Urban Construction Land Achieved Low-Carbon Sustainable Development? A Case Study of North China Plain, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, August.
    8. Shanping Wang & Peng Cao & Xiao Ouyang, 2024. "Nonlinear influence of construction land on poverty reduction efficiency in Chinese poor counties: new evidence using a panel threshold model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 3557-3587, February.
    9. Tyler Andrew Scott & Nicola Ulibarri & Omar Perez Figueroa, 2020. "NEPA and National Trends in Federal Infrastructure Siting in the United States," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(5), pages 605-633, September.
    10. Wu, Qun & Liu, Xinwang & Zhou, Ligang & Qin, Jindong & Rezaei, Jafar, 2024. "An analytical framework for the best–worst method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    11. Jiancheng Tu & Zhibin Wu, 2025. "Analytic hierarchy process rank reversals: causes and solutions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(2), pages 1785-1809, March.
    12. Despina Gavresi & Anastasia Litina & George Tsiachtsiras, 2022. "Railways and Roadways to Trust," Discussion Paper Series 2022_08, Department of Economics, University of Macedonia, revised Sep 2022.
    13. Zhang, Kaiwen & Tan, Rong, 2024. "Land policy making in a complex system: The innovation and diffusion logic of China's retained land policy reform," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    14. Wenfang Pu & Anlu Zhang, 2021. "Can Market Reforms Curb the Expansion of Industrial Land?—Based on the Panel Data Analysis of Five National-Level Urban Agglomerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    15. Orlando Corigliano & Marco Iannuzzi & Crescenzo Pellegrino & Francesco D’Amico & Leonardo Pagnotta & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2023. "Enhancing Energy Processes and Facilities Redesign in an Anaerobic Digestion Plant for Biomethane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, August.
    16. Guanglong Dong & Wenxin Zhang & Xinliang Xu & Kun Jia, 2021. "Multi-Dimensional Feature Recognition and Policy Implications of Rural Human–Land Relationships in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Patricia Mares-Nasarre & Víctor Martínez-Ibáñez & Amalia Sanz-Benlloch, 2023. "Analyzing Sustainability Awareness and Professional Ethics of Civil Engineering Bachelor’s Degree Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Jacob, Céline & Vaissiere, Anne-Charlotte & Bas, Adeline & Calvet, Coralie, 2016. "Investigating the inclusion of ecosystem services in biodiversity offsetting," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PA), pages 92-102.
    19. Erin Octaviani & Ilyas Masudin & Amelia Khoidir & Dian Palupi Restuputri, 2025. "Material Flow Analysis for Demand Forecasting and Lifetime-Based Inflow in Indonesia’s Plastic Bag Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-27, August.
    20. Alejandro Paredes-Soria & Alejandro Saúl Paredes-Egúsquiza & Juan Alberto Villagómez-Chinchay & Jorge Luis De Velazco Borda & Jorge Miguel Chávez-Díaz, 2025. "Adapting the Extended Solow Model: The Impact of Output Determinants on Economic Growth in Peru from 2000 to 2022," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7770-:d:1737021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.