IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7599-d1730739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced Optimization Strategies for No-Wait Flow Shop Scheduling with Sequence-Dependent Setup Times: A Hybrid NEH-GRASP Approach for Minimizing the Total Weighted Flow Time and Energy Cost

Author

Listed:
  • Hafsa Mimouni

    (PCMT Laboratory, National Graduate School of Arts and Crafts, Mohamed V University, Rabat 10100, Morocco)

  • Abdelilah Jalid

    (PCMT Laboratory, National Graduate School of Arts and Crafts, Mohamed V University, Rabat 10100, Morocco)

  • Said Aqil

    (LISIME Laboratory, National Graduate School of Arts and Crafts, Hassan II University, Casablanca 20360, Morocco)

Abstract

Efficient production scheduling is a key challenge in industrial operations and continues to attract significant interest within the field of operations research. This paper investigates a range of methodological approaches designed to solve the permutation flow shop scheduling problem (PFSP) with sequence-dependent setup times (SDST). The main objective is to minimize the total weighted flow time (TWFT) while ensuring a no-wait production environment. The proposed solution strategy is based on using algorithms with a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) formulation, heuristics, and their combination. The heuristics utilized in this paper include an advanced greedy randomized adaptive search procedure (GRASP) based on a priority rule and Hybrid-GRASP-NEH (HGRASP), where Nawaz-Enscore-Ham (NEH) takes place to initiate solutions, based on iterative global and local search methods to refine exploration capabilities and improve solution quality. These approaches were validated using a comprehensive set of experiments across diverse instance sizes that proved the efficiency of HGRASP, with the results showing a high-performance level that closely matched that of the exact MILP approach. Statistical analysis via the Friedman test (χ 2 = 46.75, p = 7.04 × 10 −11 ) confirmed significant performance differences among MILP, GRASP, and HGRASP. While MILP guarantees theoretical optimality, its practical effectiveness was limited by imposed computational time constraints, and HGRASP consistently achieved near-optimal solutions with superior computational efficiency, as demonstrated across diverse instance sizes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hafsa Mimouni & Abdelilah Jalid & Said Aqil, 2025. "Enhanced Optimization Strategies for No-Wait Flow Shop Scheduling with Sequence-Dependent Setup Times: A Hybrid NEH-GRASP Approach for Minimizing the Total Weighted Flow Time and Energy Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-29, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7599-:d:1730739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7599/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7599/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7599-:d:1730739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.