IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7565-d1729836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Is the Scale of the Bio-Business Sector? Insights into Quantifying the Size of the New Zealand Bioeconomy

Author

Listed:
  • Saeed Solaymani

    (Scion Group, Bioeconomy Science Institute, Titokorangi Drive, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand)

  • Marc Gaugler

    (Scion Group, Bioeconomy Science Institute, Titokorangi Drive, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand)

  • Tim Barnard

    (Scion Group, Bioeconomy Science Institute, Titokorangi Drive, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand)

  • Andrew Dunningham

    (Scion Group, Bioeconomy Science Institute, Titokorangi Drive, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand)

Abstract

Measuring the bioeconomy enables policymakers to monitor advancements in sustainable development goals, identify growth opportunities, comprehend the economic implications of bio-based products, assess environmental impacts, and shape policies that foster a sustainable economy reliant on renewable biological resources. For this purpose, this study measures the value of the bioeconomy in New Zealand using the latest published input–output table for the year 2020. This study estimates the size and economic significance of New Zealand’s bioeconomy by applying two complementary methodologies. Results indicate that, in 2020, the total value added by the bioeconomy ranged from NZD 48.8 billion to NZD 50.8 billion, representing 16.5% to 17.1% of the nation’s total value added. Agriculture emerged as the dominant contributor, accounting for approximately 89% of the sector’s total value added, followed by forestry and logging at around 11%. To identify potential growth areas, the analysis further disaggregated bioeconomy value added by economic subsectors. Among bio-based industries, food manufacturing was the largest contributor, generating 43.1% (NZD 21 billion) of total bioeconomy value added, followed by bio-based services at 12.9% (NZD 6.3 billion). The biotechnology sector contributed NZD 0.34 billion, equivalent to 0.7% of the total bioeconomy. Additional significant contributors included wood processing and manufacturing (3.3%; NZD 1.6 billion), construction (0.71%; NZD 0.35 billion), and textiles and clothing (0.58%; NZD 0.29 billion). These findings underscore the pivotal role of food manufacturing, services, wood processing, textiles and clothing, and construction in shaping the bioeconomy. They further highlight the importance of assessing the economic and environmental impacts of bio-based industries and formulating policy frameworks that support a sustainable, renewable resource-based economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeed Solaymani & Marc Gaugler & Tim Barnard & Andrew Dunningham, 2025. "What Is the Scale of the Bio-Business Sector? Insights into Quantifying the Size of the New Zealand Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7565-:d:1729836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7565/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7565/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mauricio Alviar & Andrés García-Suaza & Laura Ramírez-Gómez & Simón Villegas-Velásquez, 2021. "Measuring the Contribution of the Bioeconomy: The Case of Colombia and Antioquia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Stefania Bracco & Ozgul Calicioglu & Marta Gomez San Juan & Alessandro Flammini, 2018. "Assessing the Contribution of Bioeconomy to the Total Economy: A Review of National Frameworks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Wiebke Jander & Sven Wydra & Johann Wackerbauer & Philipp Grundmann & Stephan Piotrowski, 2020. "Monitoring Bioeconomy Transitions with Economic–Environmental and Innovation Indicators: Addressing Data Gaps in the Short Term," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Iost, Susanne & Labonte, Naemi & Banse, Martin & Geng, Natalia & Jochem, Dominik & Schweinle, Jörg & Weber, Sascha & Weimar, Holger, . "German Bioeconomy: Economic Im portance and Concept of Measurement," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 68(4).
    5. Maximilian Kardung & Kutay Cingiz & Ortwin Costenoble & Roel Delahaye & Wim Heijman & Marko Lovrić & Myrna van Leeuwen & Robert M’Barek & Hans van Meijl & Stephan Piotrowski & Tévécia Ronzon & Johanne, 2021. "Development of the Circular Bioeconomy: Drivers and Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tina Highfill & Matthew Chambers, 2023. "Developing a National Measure of the Economic Contributions of the Bioeconomy," BEA Working Papers 0206, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    2. Mauricio Alviar & Andrés García-Suaza & Laura Ramírez-Gómez & Simón Villegas-Velásquez, 2021. "Measuring the Contribution of the Bioeconomy: The Case of Colombia and Antioquia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Maximilian Kardung & Kutay Cingiz & Ortwin Costenoble & Roel Delahaye & Wim Heijman & Marko Lovrić & Myrna van Leeuwen & Robert M’Barek & Hans van Meijl & Stephan Piotrowski & Tévécia Ronzon & Johanne, 2021. "Development of the Circular Bioeconomy: Drivers and Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Xun Wei & Jie Luo & Aqing Pu & Qianqian Liu & Lei Zhang & Suowei Wu & Yan Long & Yan Leng & Zhenying Dong & Xiangyuan Wan, 2022. "From Biotechnology to Bioeconomy: A Review of Development Dynamics and Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Sharma, Rozi & Malaviya, Piyush, 2023. "Ecosystem services and climate action from a circular bioeconomy perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Schweinle, Jörg & Banse, Martin & Barrelet, Johna & Brüning, Simone & Cyffka, Karl-Friedrich & Gordillo Vera, Fernando & Iost, Susanne & Kilian, David & Omidi Saravani, Faranak & Weimar, Holger & Wils, 2025. "Setting up a bioeconomy monitoring : sustainability – resources – products," Thünen Working Paper 355887, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    7. Florian Siekmann & Sandra Venghaus, 2024. "Regional transformation pathways for the bioeconomy: A novel monitoring approach for complex transitions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 603-616, June.
    8. Maria Backhouse & Kristina Lorenzen, 2021. "Knowledge Production and Land Relations in the Bioeconomy. A Case Study on the Brazilian Sugar-Bioenergy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Tévécia Ronzon & Susanne Iost & George Philippidis, 2022. "Has the European Union entered a bioeconomy transition? Combining an output-based approach with a shift-share analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8195-8217, June.
    10. Schweinle, Jörg & Banse, Martin & Barrelet, Johna & Brüning, Simone & Cyffka, Karl-Friedrich & Gordillo Vera, Fernando & Iost, Susanne & Kilian, David & Omidi Saravani, Faranak & Weimar, Holger & Wils, 2025. "Setting Up a Bioeconomy Monitoring: Sustainability - Resources - Products," Thünen Working Papers 266, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    11. P. J. Stephenson & Anca Damerell, 2022. "Bioeconomy and Circular Economy Approaches Need to Enhance the Focus on Biodiversity to Achieve Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Marios Trigkas & Glykeria Karagouni, 2023. "State/Academia Key Stakeholders’ Perceptions Regarding Bioeconomy: Evidence from Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Morone, Piergiuseppe & Caferra, Rocco & D'Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Imbert, Enrica & Morone, Andrea, 2021. "Consumer willingness to pay for bio-based products: Do certifications matter?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    14. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2022. "Priorities in Bioeconomy Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Maria Lourdes Ordoñez Olivo & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Shaping the Knowledge Base of Bioeconomy Sectors Development in Latin American and Caribbean Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Daniela Pasnicu & Mihaela Ghenta & Aniela Matei, 2019. "Transition to Bioeconomy: Perceptions and Behaviors in Central and Eastern Europe," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 1-9, February.
    17. Vincent Smith & Justus H. H. Wesseler & David Zilberman, 2021. "New Plant Breeding Technologies: An Assessment of the Political Economy of the Regulatory Environment and Implications for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Philippidis, George & M'Barek, Robert & Urban-Boysen, Kirsten & Van Zeist, Willem-Jan, 2023. "Exploring economy-wide sustainable conditions for EU bio-chemical activities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    19. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Stavros Kalogiannidis & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2025. "Navigating the Bioeconomy: Using Delphi-SWOT to Build Robust Strategies for Sustainable Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Teodor Marian Cojocaru & Mariana Niculescu & Maria Nache Cimpoeru & Oana Alexandra Călin, 2023. "Progress of EU Member States Regarding the Bioeconomy and Biomass Producing and Converting Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7565-:d:1729836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.