IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6907-d1713062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Organizational Agility on the Sustainable Development of the Organization in the Context of Economy 5.0

Author

Listed:
  • Artur Kwasek

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Technology and Economics in Warsaw, 03-199 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Maria Kocot

    (Department of Economic Informatics, Faculty of Economics, University of Economics in Katowice, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

  • Stanisław Radowicki

    (Department of Management, Academy of Silesia, 40-555 Katowice, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Kandefer

    (Faculty of Management and Security Sciences, Social Academy of Sciences in Lodz, 90-113 Lodz, Poland)

  • Marika Szymańska

    (Institute of Management and Quality Sciences, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Management, Higher School of Professional Education, 53-329 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Dariusz Soboń

    (Institute of Management and Economics, Pomorska School of Higher Education, 83-200 Starogard Gdański, Poland)

  • Adrianna Trzaskowska-Dmoch

    (Faculty of Management, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to identify key factors shaping organizational agility as a determinant of the sustainable development of an organization in the conditions of Economy 5.0. The research used the survey method conducted in 2024 on a sample of 312 respondents. It analyzed the impact of decision-making processes, identification with the goals of the organization, tolerance of rapid changes, internal communication, internal motivation and implementation of the idea of work–life balance. Based on the results, an original mathematical model was constructed presenting the relationships between the analyzed variables. The research results confirmed a significant relationship between the level of organizational agility and the ability of the organization to implement the sustainable development strategy. It was identified that factors such as quick and accurate decision-making, strong identification of employees with the goals of the organization and efficient communication have the greatest impact on strengthening this ability. The limitation of the research was the homogeneity of the sample and the inability to fully take into account variables related to the industry and cultural context. The research highlights that enhancing organizational agility is crucial for achieving sustainable development and building lasting competitive advantage in the dynamic context of the Economy 5.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Artur Kwasek & Maria Kocot & Stanisław Radowicki & Krzysztof Kandefer & Marika Szymańska & Dariusz Soboń & Adrianna Trzaskowska-Dmoch, 2025. "The Impact of Organizational Agility on the Sustainable Development of the Organization in the Context of Economy 5.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6907-:d:1713062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6907/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6907/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I Ketut Setia Sapta & I Nengah Sudja & I Nengah Landra & Ni Wayan Rustiarini, 2021. "Sustainability Performance of Organization: Mediating Role of Knowledge Management," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Lotta-Maria Sinervo & Luca Bartocci & Pauliina Lehtonen & Carol Ebdon, 2024. "Toward sustainable governance with participatory budgeting," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Ali Ateeq & Abd Al-Aziz Al-refaei & Mohammed Alzoraiki & Marwan Milhem & Ali Nasser Al-Tahitah & Abdulhadi Ibrahim, 2024. "Sustaining Organizational Outcomes in Manufacturing Firms: The Role of HRM and Occupational Health and Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, January.
    4. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    5. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    6. Abas Rawashdeh & Ayman Bahjat Abdallah & Moayyad Alfawaeer & Mohammad Al Dweiri & Feras Al-Jaghbeer, 2024. "The Impact of Strategic Agility on Environmental Sustainability: The Mediating Role of Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Constantin Bremer & Anna Rylander Eklund & Maria Elmquist, 2025. "Scaling or growing agile? Proposing a manifesto for agile organization development," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 14(1), pages 23-34, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    2. Jiatong Yu & Jiajue Wang & Taesoo Moon, 2022. "Influence of Digital Transformation Capability on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Christiana Müller & Stefan Vorbach, 2015. "Enabling Business Model Change: Evidence from High-Technology Firms," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 11(1), pages 53-75.
    4. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Scherrer, Aline & Rogge, Karoline S., 2025. "When do incumbents adopt radical net-zero technologies? Analysing differences in strategy trajectories of European truck manufacturers towards alternative vehicle technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    6. Luis Araya-Castillo & Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Hugo Moraga & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, March.
    7. FeCheng Ma & Farhan Khan & Kashif Ullah Khan & Si XiangYun, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Information Technology, Absorptive Capacity, and Dynamic Capabilities on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    8. Francisco Gustavo Bautista Carrillo & Daniel Arias-Aranda, 2025. "Technological Adoption Sequences and Sustainable Innovation Performance: A Longitudinal Analysis of Optimal Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    10. André de Abreu Saraiva Monteiro Alves & Fernando Manuel Pereira de Oliveira Carvalho, 2022. "How Dynamic Managerial Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Operational Capabilities Impact Microenterprises’ Global Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Zhonghua Zhao & Fanchen Meng & Yin He & Zhouyang Gu, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Competitive Advantage with Multiple Mediations from Social Capital and Dynamic Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    12. A. E. Rodríguez Salazar & M. A. Domínguez-Crespo & A. M. Torres-Huerta & A. I. Licona-Aguilar & A. Nivón-Pellón & V. N. Orta-Guzmán, 2021. "Analysis of the Dynamical Capabilities into the Public Research Institutes to Their Strategic Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Hélène Laurell & Leona Achtenhagen & Svante Andersson, 2017. "The changing role of network ties and critical capabilities in an international new venture’s early development," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 113-140, March.
    14. van Uden, Annelies & Knoben, Joris & Vermeulen, P.A.M., 2015. "Making Sense of Industry Characteristics as Drivers of Dynamic Capabilites," Other publications TiSEM fbb2a35d-c957-489b-b170-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    16. Sjödin, David & Liljeborg, Alexander & Mutter, Sermed, 2024. "Conceptualizing ecosystem management capabilities: Managing the ecosystem-organization interface," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    17. Jantunen, Ari & Tarkiainen, Anssi & Chari, Simos & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2018. "Dynamic capabilities, operational changes, and performance outcomes in the media industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 251-257.
    18. Mostafiz, Md Imtiaz & Ahmed, Farhad Uddin & Tardios, Janja & Hughes, Paul & Tarba, Shlomo Y., 2025. "Configuring international entrepreneurial orientation and dynamic internationalization capability to predict international performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(2).
    19. Yi-Ju Lo & Tung Hung, 2015. "Structure offshoring and returns on offshoring," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 443-479, June.
    20. von den Driesch, Till & Eva Susanne da Costa, Maika & Christina Flatten, Tessa & Brettel, Malte, 2015. "How CEO experience, personality, and network affect firms' dynamic capabilities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 245-256.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6907-:d:1713062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.