IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6629-d1705925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Compatibility Between Popular Carbon Footprint Calculators and the Canadian National Inventory Report

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Arif

    (School of Environmental Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
    Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Anupama A. Sharan

    (School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Warren Mabee

    (School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
    Department of Geography and Planning, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

Abstract

Personal lifestyle choices contribute up to 75% of national emissions and yet the greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories included in the National Inventory Report (NIR) of Canada provide limited insight on these choices. Better insight can be found using carbon footprint calculators that estimate individual emissions; however, they vary in regard to their input parameters, output data, and calculation methods. This study assessed five calculators, which are popular with the public, or compatibility with the Canadian NIR. A quantitative scoring matrix was developed to assess the output depth, academic proficiency, and effectiveness of the calculators to inform lifestyle changes, alongside NIR alignment. The results showed that the calculator with the overall highest cumulative score across all the comparative criteria was the one offered by Carbon Footprint Ltd. The other calculators that scored highly include CoolClimate Calculator and Carbon Independent. The potential of the calculators in regard to informing low-carbon lifestyles can be improved through the incorporation of more depth in terms of capturing the purchase information of goods and services and providing detailed secondary information to users, including mitigation strategies and carbon offset options. The main driver of incompatibility between the calculator tools and the NIR was the different approaches taken to the emissions inventory, with the NIR using a territorial framework and the calculators being consumption driven. The outcomes of this study demonstrate a global need for the evolution of NIR structuring to increase its relatability with citizens and for the improved standardization of publicly available tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Arif & Anupama A. Sharan & Warren Mabee, 2025. "An Analysis of the Compatibility Between Popular Carbon Footprint Calculators and the Canadian National Inventory Report," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6629-:d:1705925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6629/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6629/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6629-:d:1705925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.