IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6089-d1693651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

South African Consumer Attitudes Towards Plant Breeding Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Naweed Mohamed

    (Biosafety South Africa and Technology Innovation Agency, 10 Old Warehouse, Black River Business Park, 1 Fir Street, Cape Town 7925, South Africa)

  • Magdeleen Cilliers

    (South African National Seed Organization, 352 Kiepersol Road, Pretoria 0081, South Africa)

  • Jhill Johns

    (Biosafety South Africa and Technology Innovation Agency, 10 Old Warehouse, Black River Business Park, 1 Fir Street, Cape Town 7925, South Africa)

  • Jan-Hendrik Groenewald

    (Biosafety South Africa and Technology Innovation Agency, 10 Old Warehouse, Black River Business Park, 1 Fir Street, Cape Town 7925, South Africa)

Abstract

South Africa’s bioeconomy strategy identifies bio-innovation as a key driver of economic growth and social development, with plant breeding playing a central role in improving food security through the development of high-yielding, resilient, and high-quality crops. However, consumer perceptions of recent advances, particularly new breeding techniques (NBTs), remain underexplored. This study examines South African consumer attitudes towards plant breeding innovations, using a mixed-methods approach. The initial focus group interviews informed the development of a structured quantitative survey examining familiarity, perceptions, and acceptance of plant breeding technologies. Consumer awareness of plant breeding principles was found to be limited, with 67–68% of respondents unfamiliar with both conventional and modern plant breeding procedures. Despite this information gap, consumers expressed conditional support for modern breeding techniques, especially when associated with actual benefits like increased nutritional value, environmental sustainability, and crop resilience. When favourable effects were outlined, support for general investment in modern breeding practices climbed from 45% to 74%. Consumer purchase decisions emphasised price, product quality, and convenience over manufacturing techniques, with sustainability ranked last among the assessed factors. Trust in the sources of food safety information varied greatly, with medical experts and scientists being ranked highly, while government sources were viewed more sceptically. The results further suggest that targeted education could improve customer confidence, as there is a significant positive association (R 2 = 0.938) between familiarity and acceptance. These findings emphasise the significance of open communication strategies and focused consumer education in increasing the adoption of plant breeding breakthroughs. The study offers useful insights for policymakers, researchers, and industry stakeholders working on engagement strategies to facilitate the ethical growth and application of agricultural biotechnology in support of food security and quality in South Africa. This study contributes to a better understanding of South African consumers’ perceptions of plant breeding innovations and food safety. The research findings offer valuable insights for policymakers, researchers, and industry stakeholders in developing effective engagement and communication strategies that address consumer concerns and promote the adoption of products derived from diverse plant breeding technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Naweed Mohamed & Magdeleen Cilliers & Jhill Johns & Jan-Hendrik Groenewald, 2025. "South African Consumer Attitudes Towards Plant Breeding Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6089-:d:1693651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6089/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6089/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shahida Anusha Siddiqui & Zarnab Asif & Misbah Murid & Ito Fernando & Danung Nur Adli & Andrey Vladimirovich Blinov & Alexey Borisovich Golik & Widya Satya Nugraha & Salam A. Ibrahim & Seid Mahdi Jafa, 2022. "Consumer Social and Psychological Factors Influencing the Use of Genetically Modified Foods—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Gabriella Vindigni & Iuri Peri & Federica Consentino & Roberta Selvaggi & Daniela Spina, 2022. "Exploring Consumers’ Attitudes towards Food Products Derived by New Plant Breeding Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamam, Manal & Raimondo, Maria & Spina, Daniela & Király, Gábor & Di Vita, Giuseppe & D’Amico, Mario & Tóth, József, 2023. "Climate Change Perception and Innovative Mitigation Practices Adopted by Hungarian Farms," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 15(3), September.
    2. Katie Henderson & Bodo Lang & Joya Kemper & Denise Conroy, 2024. "Exploring diverse food system actor perspectives on gene editing: a systematic review of socio-cultural factors influencing acceptability," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(2), pages 883-907, June.
    3. Bing Zhu, Ananya Phunthasaen, Chainarong Rungruengarporn, Salila Pinpak, 2024. "Understanding Thai Consumers' Intentions to Purchase Genetically Modified Foods," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 5(4), October.
    4. Zhu, Bing; Phunthasaen, Ananya; Rungruengarporn, Chainarong; Pinpak, Salila, 2024. "Understanding Thai Consumers' Intentions to Purchase Genetically Modified Foods," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 5(4), October.
    5. Federica Consentino & Iuri Peri & Mattia Litrico & Daniela Spina & Gabriella Vindigni, 2024. "Mapping young farmers’ choice to pursue Geographical Indication in a rural context: application of fuzzy cognitive map," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. António Raposo & Heesup Han, 2022. "The Multifaceted Nature of Food and Nutrition Insecurity around the World and Foodservice Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-3, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6089-:d:1693651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.