IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5939-d1689336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design Method for Platform-Aggregated Life Cycle Ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Tomoyuki Tamura

    (School of Engineering, Hongo Campus, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku 113-8654, Tokyo, Japan)

  • Ryota Odagaki

    (School of Engineering, Hongo Campus, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku 113-8654, Tokyo, Japan)

  • Yusuke Kishita

    (School of Engineering, Hongo Campus, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku 113-8654, Tokyo, Japan)

  • Yasushi Umeda

    (School of Engineering, Hongo Campus, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku 113-8654, Tokyo, Japan)

  • Gaku Miyake

    (Panasonic Holdings Co., Ltd., 1006, Kadoma 571-8501, Osaka, Japan)

  • Genichiro Matsuda

    (Panasonic Holdings Co., Ltd., 1006, Kadoma 571-8501, Osaka, Japan)

  • Akio Tajima

    (Panasonic ET Solutions Co., Ltd., 2-1-61 Shiromi, Chuo-ku 540-0001, Osaka, Japan)

Abstract

The circular economy (CE) is increasingly important in ensuring sustainable development. Although interactions among stakeholders are essential to achieving the CE, existing methods associated with life cycle design do not fully consider the synergies between multiple product life cycles (PLCs). Therefore, this paper proposes a platform-aggregated life cycle ecosystem (PF-LCE). The PF-LCE consists of multiple PLCs along with a platform that enables the exchange of goods and data among different PLCs. We also propose a method for supporting the conceptual design of the PF-LCE. Our method includes a four-step process to help exploit the interactions and synergistic effects occurring across PLCs at the design stage. We then use a simulated case study of PLCs sharing goods and data in the shoe industry, considering scenarios ranging from business-as-usual to full integration of the platform with four service providers. The results demonstrate that the designed PF-LCE delivers an increase in profits to service providers alongside reduced costs for consumers. CO 2 emissions also decrease. Therefore, the design method that we propose has the potential to enhance current implementations of the CE in terms of business revenues, consumer satisfaction, and environmental sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomoyuki Tamura & Ryota Odagaki & Yusuke Kishita & Yasushi Umeda & Gaku Miyake & Genichiro Matsuda & Akio Tajima, 2025. "Design Method for Platform-Aggregated Life Cycle Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5939-:d:1689336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5939/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5939/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scaringella, Laurent & Radziwon, Agnieszka, 2018. "Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 59-87.
    2. Korhonen, Jouni & Honkasalo, Antero & Seppälä, Jyri, 2018. "Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 37-46.
    3. Junghee Han & Almas Heshmati & Masoomeh Rashidghalam, 2020. "Circular Economy Business Models with a Focus on Servitization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Chauhan, Chetna & Parida, Vinit & Dhir, Amandeep, 2022. "Linking circular economy and digitalisation technologies: A systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    5. Tobias Kretschmer & Aija Leiponen & Melissa Schilling & Gurneeta Vasudeva, 2022. "Platform ecosystems as meta‐organizations: Implications for platform strategies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 405-424, March.
    6. Laurent Scaringella & Agnieszka Radziwon, 2018. "Innovative Entrepreneurial Knowledge-based Business Ecosystems: Old Wine in New Bottles?," Post-Print hal-01953922, HAL.
    7. Magdalena Rusch & Josef‐Peter Schöggl & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2023. "Application of digital technologies for sustainable product management in a circular economy: A review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 1159-1174, March.
    8. Tsujimoto, Masaharu & Kajikawa, Yuya & Tomita, Junichi & Matsumoto, Yoichi, 2018. "A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 49-58.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcia Cristiane Gruba & Danielle Denes & Rodrigo Cortopassi Goron Lobo & Andrew Jay Isaak, 2022. "Circular Economy Initiatives: Strategic Implications, Resource Management, and Entrepreneurial Innovation in a Brazilian Craft Beer Ecosystem during the COVID Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Flechas, Ximena Alejandra & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Borini, Felipe Mendes, 2021. "Ecosystem management: Past achievements and future promises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. Marzena Kramarz & Lilla Knop & Edyta Przybylska & Katarzyna Dohn, 2021. "Stakeholders of the Multimodal Freight Transport Ecosystem in Polish–Czech–Slovak Cross-Border Area," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-32, April.
    5. Changhee Yoon & Seungyeon Moon & Heesang Lee, 2022. "Symbiotic Relationships in Business Ecosystem: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Phillips, Mark A. & Ritala, Paavo, 2019. "A complex adaptive systems agenda for ecosystem research methodology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. Arenal, Alberto & Armuña, Cristina & Feijoo, Claudio & Ramos, Sergio & Xu, Zimu & Moreno, Ana, 2020. "Innovation ecosystems theory revisited: The case of artificial intelligence in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    8. Oliver, Paul G. & Mora, Luca & Zhang, Jun, 2025. "Collaboration before competition: How smart city entrepreneurs co-create temporary ecosystems to build capacity for learning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    9. Jeandri Robertson, 2020. "Competition in Knowledge Ecosystems: A Theory Elaboration Approach Using a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Islam, Md. Monirul & Mahmudul Alam, Md. & Sohag, Kazi, 2025. "Recycling through technology diffusion for circular economy in Europe: A decomposed assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    11. Dionisio, Eduardo Avancci & Inácio Júnior, Edmundo & Fischer, Bruno Brandão, 2021. "Country-level efficiency and the index of dynamic entrepreneurship: Contributions from an efficiency approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    12. Roberto Osorno-Hinojosa & Mikko Koria & Delia del Carmen Ramírez-Vázquez & Gabriela Calvario, 2023. "Designing Platforms for Micro and Small Enterprises in Emerging Economies: Sharing Value through Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Huynh Evertsen, Phuc & Rasmussen, Einar & Nenadic, Oleg, 2022. "Commercializing circular economy innovations: A taxonomy of academic spin-offs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    14. Wolfert, Sjaak & Verdouw, Cor & van Wassenaer, Lan & Dolfsma, Wilfred & Klerkx, Laurens, 2023. "Digital innovation ecosystems in agri-food: design principles and organizational framework," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    15. Pouru-Mikkola, Laura & Minkkinen, Matti & Malho, Maria & Neuvonen, Aleksi, 2023. "Exploring knowledge creation, capabilities, and relations in a distributed policy foresight system: Case Finland," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    16. Agnieszka Nowaczek & Zygmunt Kowalski & Joanna Kulczycka & Agnieszka Makara, 2024. "Determinants of the Implementation of a Circular Economy Model in the Tire Sector in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Iordanis Eleftheriadis & Evgenia Anagnostopoulou, 2024. "Developing a Tool for Calculating the Carbon Footprint in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, February.
    18. Nikhil Ramkrishna Bandodkar & Renu Singh, 2022. "Small and Startup IT Firms, Information Chasms, and the Market for Acquisitions," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Komlósi, Éva & Sebestyén, Tamás & Tóth-Pajor, Ákos & Bedő, Zsolt, 2022. "Do specific entrepreneurial ecosystems favor high-level networking while others not? Lessons from the Hungarian IT sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    20. Cobben, Dieudonnee & Ooms, Ward & Roijakkers, Nadine & Radziwon, Agnieszka, 2022. "Ecosystem types: A systematic review on boundaries and goals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 138-164.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5939-:d:1689336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.