IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5829-d1686670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Nonlinear Causal Effect Estimation of the Built Environment on Urban Rail Transit Station Flow Under Emergency

Author

Listed:
  • Qianqi Fan

    (Shanghai Kev Laboratory of Rail Infrastructure Durability and System Safety, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    College of Transportation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Chengcheng Yu

    (College of Transportation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Jianyong Zuo

    (Shanghai Kev Laboratory of Rail Infrastructure Durability and System Safety, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    College of Transportation, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

Urban rail transit (URT) systems are critical for sustainable urban mobility but are increasingly vulnerable to disruptions and emergencies. While extensive research has examined the built environment’s influence on transit demand under normal conditions, the nonlinear causal mechanisms shaping URT passenger flow during emergencies remain understudied. This study proposes an artificial intelligence-based causal machine learning framework integrating causal structure learning and causal effect estimation to investigate how the built environment, network structure, and incident characteristics causally affect URT station-level ridership during emergencies. Using empirical data from Shanghai’s URT network, this study uncovers dual pathways through which built environment attributes affect passenger flow: by directly shaping baseline ridership and indirectly influencing intermodal connectivity (e.g., bus connectivity) that mitigates disruptions. The findings demonstrate significant nonlinear and heterogeneous causal effects; notably, stations with high network centrality experience disproportionately severe ridership losses during disruptions, while robust bus connectivity substantially buffers such impacts. Incident type and timing also notably modulate disruption severity, with peak-hour incidents and severe disruptions (e.g., power failures) amplifying passenger flow declines. These insights highlight critical areas for policy intervention, emphasizing the necessity of targeted management strategies, enhanced intermodal integration, and adaptive emergency response protocols to bolster URT resilience under crisis scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Qianqi Fan & Chengcheng Yu & Jianyong Zuo, 2025. "The Nonlinear Causal Effect Estimation of the Built Environment on Urban Rail Transit Station Flow Under Emergency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-27, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5829-:d:1686670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5829/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5829/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Chao & Yu, Chengcheng & Dong, Wentao & Yuan, Quan, 2023. "Substitutes or complements? Examining effects of urban rail transit on bus ridership using longitudinal city-level data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Menno Yap & Oded Cats, 2021. "Predicting disruptions and their passenger delay impacts for public transport stops," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1703-1731, August.
    3. Jinkyung Choi & Yong Lee & Taewan Kim & Keemin Sohn, 2012. "An analysis of Metro ridership at the station-to-station level in Seoul," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 705-722, May.
    4. Nan Zhang & Daniel J. Graham & Daniel Hörcher & Prateek Bansal, 2021. "A causal inference approach to measure the vulnerability of urban metro systems," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3269-3300, December.
    5. Zhenbao Wang & Jiarui Song & Yuchen Zhang & Shihao Li & Jianlin Jia & Chengcheng Song, 2022. "Spatial Heterogeneity Analysis for Influencing Factors of Outbound Ridership of Subway Stations Considering the Optimal Scale Range of “7D” Built Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Yu Zhang & Yang Bian & Xiaohua Zhao & Xuena Zhao, 2024. "Integrating Safety and Efficiency: Design and Evaluation of Dynamic Emergency Evacuation Sign System in Urban Rail Transit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin Cottreau & Adel Adraoui & Ouassim Manout & Louafi Bouzouina, 2023. "Spatio‐temporal patterns of the impact of COVID‐19 on public transit: An exploratory analysis from Lyon, France," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(8), pages 1702-1721, October.
    2. Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos & Stathopoulos, Antony & Karlaftis, Matthew G., 2017. "Ridership estimation of a new LRT system: Direct demand model approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 146-156.
    3. Kim, Suji & Lee, Sujin & Ko, Eunjeong & Jang, Kitae & Yeo, Jiho, 2021. "Changes in car and bus usage amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Relationship with land use and land price," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    4. Bo Wan & Xudan Zhao & Yuhan Sun & Tao Yang, 2023. "Unraveling the Impact of Spatial Configuration on TOD Function Mix Use and Spatial Intensity: An Analysis of 47 Morning Top-Flow Stations in Beijing (2018–2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    5. Christian Martin Mützel & Joachim Scheiner, 2022. "Investigating spatio-temporal mobility patterns and changes in metro usage under the impact of COVID-19 using Taipei Metro smart card data," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 343-366, June.
    6. Chan, Ho-Yin & Ma, Hanxi & Zhou, Jiangping, 2024. "Resilience of socio-technical transportation systems: A demand-driven community detection in human mobility structures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    7. L. Sravya Jayanthi & Srinivas S. Pulugurtha & Raunak Mishra, 2023. "Examining the association between bus transit reliability and the number of boarding passengers," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 675-696, October.
    8. Cui, Mengying & Yu, Lijie & Nie, Shaoyu & Dai, Zhe & Ge, Ying-en & Levinson, David, 2025. "How do access and spatial dependency shape metro passenger flows," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    9. Ingvardson, Jesper Bláfoss & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2018. "How urban density, network topology and socio-economy influence public transport ridership: Empirical evidence from 48 European metropolitan areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 50-63.
    10. Deka, Devajyoti & Wang, Chihuangji, 2024. "An investigation into the potential use of information and communication technologies by trip-deprived older adults in New Jersey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Vergel-Tovar, C. Erik & Rodriguez, Daniel A., 2018. "The ridership performance of the built environment for BRT systems: Evidence from Latin America," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 172-184.
    12. Wang, Jing & Wan, Feng & Dong, Chunjiao & Yin, Chaoying & Chen, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal effects of built environment factors on varying rail transit station ridership patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Shen, Yi & Yang, Huang & Ren, Gang & Ran, Bin, 2024. "Model cascading overload failure and dynamic vulnerability analysis of facility network of metro station," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    14. Peikun Li & Quantao Yang & Wenbo Lu & Shu Xi & Hao Wang, 2024. "An Improved Machine Learning Framework Considering Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity for Analyzing the Relationship Between Subway Station-Level Passenger Flow Resilience and Land Use-Related Built Environ," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Peikun Li & Quantao Yang & Wenbo Lu, 2024. "Nonlinear Relationship of Multi-Source Land Use Features with Temporal Travel Distances at Subway Station Level: Empirical Study from Xi’an City," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Jaewoo Lee & Keemin Sohn, 2014. "Identifying the Impact on Land Prices of Replacing At-grade or Elevated Railways with Underground Subways in the Seoul Metropolitan Area," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(1), pages 44-62, January.
    17. Lijie Yu & Yarong Cong & Kuanmin Chen, 2020. "Determination of the Peak Hour Ridership of Metro Stations in Xi’an, China Using Geographically-Weighted Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    18. Jie Huang & David Levinson & Jiaoe Wang & Haitao Jin, 2019. "Job-worker spatial dynamics in Beijing: Insights from Smart Card Data," Working Papers 2019-01, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    19. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu & Liu, Chao, 2019. "How does the station-area built environment influence Metrorail ridership? Using gradient boosting decision trees to identify non-linear thresholds," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-78.
    20. Jinbao Zhao & Wei Deng & Yan Song & Yueran Zhu, 2014. "Analysis of Metro ridership at station level and station-to-station level in Nanjing: an approach based on direct demand models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 133-155, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5829-:d:1686670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.