IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5311-d1674713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tourist Walkability in Traditional Villages: The Role of Built Environment, Shareability, and Personal Attributes

Author

Listed:
  • Tze Ming Leung

    (Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Protection and Utilization Technology in Stone and Brick Cultural Relics, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou 425199, China)

  • Siyu Miao

    (School of Economics and Management, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou 425199, China)

  • Minqi Lin

    (Department of Building Environment and Energy Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Huiying (Cynthia) Hou

    (Department of Building Environment and Energy Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Ming Sun

    (Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Protection and Utilization Technology in Stone and Brick Cultural Relics, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou 425199, China)

Abstract

Tourist walkability is essential for sustainable tourism in traditional villages, where walking is often the primary mode of exploration. However, few studies have examined walkability from tourists’ perspectives, especially in village settings. This study investigates how immediate built environment perceptions, shareability (defined as the capacity of a place to encourage social media sharing), and personal attributes affect tourist walkability in traditional villages. A questionnaire survey was conducted in two traditional villages in Yongzhou, Hunan, to explore these relationships. The results reveal that the perceived quantity of traditional architecture strongly influences tourist walkability, while among built environment features, artificial features exert a greater overall impact than natural ones. Moreover, shareability plays a significant role in enhancing walkability, whereas personal attributes, though influential, have a relatively smaller effect. As the majority of survey participants were aged 18–24, these findings are particularly relevant to understanding the tourism preferences of Generation Z, a cohort with growing influence in the tourism market. These insights provide valuable guidance for designers, tourism developers, and authorities aiming to enhance walkability, promote sustainable tourism, and revitalise culturally rich traditional villages.

Suggested Citation

  • Tze Ming Leung & Siyu Miao & Minqi Lin & Huiying (Cynthia) Hou & Ming Sun, 2025. "Tourist Walkability in Traditional Villages: The Role of Built Environment, Shareability, and Personal Attributes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5311-:d:1674713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5311/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5311/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohsin Javed & Zuzana Tučková & Abdul Bashiru Jibril, 2020. "The Role of Social Media on Tourists’ Behavior: An Empirical Analysis of Millennials from the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Zahed Ghaderi & Luc Béal & Mustafeed Zaman & Collin Michael Hall & Raouf Ahmad Rather, 2024. "How does sharing travel experiences on social media improve social and personal ties?," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(21), pages 3478-3494, November.
    3. Jiyun Lee & Donghyun Kim & Jina Park, 2022. "A Machine Learning and Computer Vision Study of the Environmental Characteristics of Streetscapes That Affect Pedestrian Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Kun Yuan & Hirokazu Abe & Noriko Otsuka & Kensuke Yasufuku & Akira Takahashi, 2023. "A Comprehensive Evaluation of Walkability in Historical Cities: The Case of Xi’an and Kyoto," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Dobrica Jovicic, 2016. "Cultural tourism in the context of relations between mass and alternative tourism," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 605-612, May.
    6. Khaled Shaaban, 2019. "Assessing Sidewalk and Corridor Walkability in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Bradley Bereitschaft, 2017. "Equity in Microscale Urban Design and Walkability: A Photographic Survey of Six Pittsburgh Streetscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Pedro Manuel da Costa Liberato & Elisa Alén-González & Dália Filipa Veloso de Azevedo Liberato, 2018. "Digital Technology in a Smart Tourist Destination: The Case of Porto," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 75-97, January.
    9. Leyden, K.M., 2003. "Social Capital and the Built Environment: The Importance of Walkable Neighborhoods," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1546-1551.
    10. Patrick Buckley & Paul Stangl & Jeff Guinn, 2017. "Why people walk: modeling foundational and higher order needs based on latent structure," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 129-149, April.
    11. Battista, Geoffrey A. & Manaugh, Kevin, 2018. "Stores and mores: Toward socializing walkability," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 53-60.
    12. Gao, Jie & Kamphuis, Carlijn B.M. & Helbich, Marco & Ettema, Dick, 2020. "What is ‘neighborhood walkability’? How the built environment differently correlates with walking for different purposes and with walking on weekdays and weekends," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Ekaterina Shafray & Seiyong Kim, 2017. "A Study of Walkable Spaces with Natural Elements for Urban Regeneration: A Focus on Cases in Seoul, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Zahed Ghaderi & Luc Béal & Mustafeed Zaman & Collin Michael Hall & Raouf Ahmad Rather, 2024. "How Does Sharing Travel Experiences on Social Media Improve Social and Personal Ties?," Post-Print hal-04888411, HAL.
    15. Rob Shields & Edmar Joaquim Gomes da Silva & Thiago Lima e Lima & Nathalia Osorio, 2023. "Walkability: a review of trends," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 19-41, January.
    16. Xiang Gao & Zao Li & Xia Sun, 2023. "Relevance between Tourist Behavior and the Spatial Environment in Huizhou Traditional Villages—A Case Study of Pingshan Village, Yi County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Michael James Walsh & Raechel Johns & Naomi F. Dale, 2019. "The social media tourist gaze: social media photography and its disruption at the zoo," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 391-412, September.
    18. Xi Li & Jiayu Xie & Sharleen X. Chen, 2022. "Cannot wait to share? An exploration of tourists’ sharing behavior during the ‘traveling to the site’ stage," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(22), pages 3640-3656, November.
    19. Sanaz Tabatabaee & Mahdi Aghaabbasi & Amir Mahdiyar & Rosilawati Zainol & Syuhaida Ismail, 2021. "Measurement Quality Appraisal Instrument for Evaluation of Walkability Assessment Tools Based on Walking Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Yuanyuan Mao & Xiyuan Ren & Ling Yin & Qingying Sun & Ke Song & De Wang, 2021. "Investigating Tourists’ Willingness to Walk (WTW) to Attractions within Scenic Areas: A Case Study of Tongli Ancient Town, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eun Jung Kim & Hyunjung Kim, 2020. "Neighborhood Walkability and Housing Prices: A Correlation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Zhehao Zhang & Thomas Fisher & Gang Feng, 2020. "Assessing the Rationality and Walkability of Campus Layouts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Bradley Bereitschaft, 2023. "The changing ethno-racial profile of ‘very walkable’ urban neighbourhoods in the US (2010–2020): Are minorities under-represented?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(4), pages 638-654, March.
    4. Pouya Molaei & Liyaning Tang & Mary Hardie, 2021. "Measuring Walkability with Street Connectivity and Physical Activity: A Case Study in Iran," World, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Ali Keyvanfar & M. Salim Ferwati & Arezou Shafaghat & Hasanuddin Lamit, 2018. "A Path Walkability Assessment Index Model for Evaluating and Facilitating Retail Walking Using Decision-Tree-Making (DTM) Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-33, March.
    6. Chuanmei Chen & Normalisa Md Isa & Norkhazzaina Salahuddin, 2025. "Determinants of Travel Experience-Sharing Behavior on Chinese Social Media Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Shannon Rogers & Semra Aytur & Kevin Gardner & Cynthia Carlson, 2012. "Measuring community sustainability: exploring the intersection of the built environment & social capital with a participatory case study," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 143-153, June.
    8. Noelia Somarriba Arechavala & Pilar Zarzosa Espina & Ana Teresa López Pastor, 2022. "The Importance of the Neighbourhood Environment and Social Capital for Happiness in a Vulnerable District: The Case of the Pajarillos District in Spain," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1941-1965, June.
    9. Junjie Gao & Younghwan Pan, 2022. "Evaluating Influencing Factors of Tourists’ Experiences with Smart Tour Guide System: A Mixed Method Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Zeru Jiang & Bo Zhang & Chunlai Yuan & Zhaojie Han & Jiangtao Liu, 2024. "Can Urban Sprawl Promote Enterprise Innovation? Evidence from A-Share Listed Companies in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Georgios Giotis & Evangelia Papadionysiou, 2022. "The Role of Managerial and Technological Innovations in the Tourism Industry: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Ball, Kylie & Cleland, Verity J. & Timperio, Anna F. & Salmon, Jo & Giles-Corti, Billie & Crawford, David A., 2010. "Love thy neighbour? Associations of social capital and crime with physical activity amongst women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(4), pages 807-814, August.
    13. Albert Lee & Keiko Nakamura, 2021. "Engaging Diverse Community Groups to Promote Population Health through Healthy City Approach: Analysis of Successful Cases in Western Pacific Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-26, June.
    14. Austin Boyle & Charles Barrilleaux & Daniel Scheller, 2014. "Does Walkability Influence Housing Prices?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(3), pages 852-867, September.
    15. Natalia Distefano & Salvatore Leonardi & Nilda Georgina Liotta, 2023. "Walking for Sustainable Cities: Factors Affecting Users’ Willingness to Walk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Cong Li & Yajuan Zhou & Manfei Wu & Jiayue Xu & Xin Fu, 2025. "Exploring Nonlinear Threshold Effects and Interactions Between Built Environment and Urban Vitality at the Block Level Using Machine Learning," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, June.
    17. Ana Gil Solá & Bertil Vilhelmson, 2018. "Negotiating Proximity in Sustainable Urban Planning: A Swedish Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Katherine King, 2013. "Jane Jacobs and ‘The Need for Aged Buildings’: Neighbourhood Historical Development Pace and Community Social Relations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(12), pages 2407-2424, September.
    19. Bonatti, Luigi & Campiglio, Emanuele, 2013. "How can transportation policies affect growth? A theoretical analysis of the long-term effects of alternative mobility systems," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 528-540.
    20. Marquet, Oriol & Miralles-Guasch, Carme, 2015. "Neighbourhood vitality and physical activity among the elderly: The role of walkable environments on active ageing in Barcelona, Spain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 24-30.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5311-:d:1674713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.