IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p5006-d1667664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence Technologies as Smart Solutions for Sustainable Protected Areas Management

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmet Atalay

    (Department of Sport Management, Sport Science Faculty, Ardahan University, 75000 Ardahan, Türkiye)

  • Dalia Perkumienė

    (Alytus Faculty, Kauno Kolegija Higher Education Institution, 62252 Alytus, Lithuania)

  • Larbi Safaa

    (Alytus Faculty, Kauno Kolegija Higher Education Institution, 62252 Alytus, Lithuania)

  • Mindaugas Škėma

    (Institute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, 44221 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Marius Aleinikovas

    (Institute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, 44221 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming not only an auxiliary tool, but also one of the main factors helping to shape natural resource management models. The application of artificial intelligence in protected areas allows for a transition to more sustainable management of protected areas. By applying artificial intelligence technologies, it is possible not only to respond to changes or violations that have already occurred but also to more effectively predict potential threats, form long-term protection strategies, and make rational decisions based on accurate and timely data analysis. This study aims to determine the possibilities and importance of applying artificial intelligence technologies to the sustainable management of protected areas. The sample group of this study consists of a total of 135 experts from Turkey, Lithuania, and Morocco (45 from each country). The sample includes professionals with expertise in the relevant field, namely lawyers (9), academics (9), managers of protected areas (9), government officials responsible for protected areas (9), and representatives of non-governmental organizations (9). This study employed qualitative research methods, within which a case study design was adopted. For the analysis of the findings, thematic analysis and content analysis techniques were utilized to ensure a comprehensive and in-depth interpretation of the data. Analysis of the results of this study showed that integrating AI into the management of protected areas increases management efficiency and helps create long-term strategies, but successful application depends on cooperation between technology developers, scientists, and environmental specialists. Also, AI applications are expected to be a critical part of the process of environmental sustainability and fighting climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmet Atalay & Dalia Perkumienė & Larbi Safaa & Mindaugas Škėma & Marius Aleinikovas, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence Technologies as Smart Solutions for Sustainable Protected Areas Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-28, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5006-:d:1667664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5006/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5006/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olegas Beriozovas & Dalia Perkumienė & Mindaugas Škėma & Abdellah Saoualih & Larbi Safaa & Marius Aleinikovas, 2024. "Research Advancement in Forest Property Rights: A Thematic Review over Half a Decade Using Natural Language Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Liangyong Xue & Abdullah Mat Rashid & Sha Ouyang, 2024. "The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in Higher Education: A Systematic Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, February.
    3. Shaofeng Wang & Hao Zhang, 2025. "Promoting sustainable development goals through generative artificial intelligence in the digital supply chain: Insights from Chinese tourism SMEs," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 1231-1248, February.
    4. Jakučionytė-Skodienė, Miglė & Liobikienė, Genovaitė, 2023. "Changes in energy consumption and CO2 emissions in the Lithuanian household sector caused by environmental awareness and climate change policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    5. Rubén De Diego & José-Fernán Martínez & Jesús Rodríguez-Molina & Alexandra Cuerva, 2014. "A Semantic Middleware Architecture Focused on Data and Heterogeneity Management within the Smart Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-42, September.
    6. Abdellah Saoualih & Larbi Safaa & Ayoub Bouhatous & Marc Bidan & Dalia Perkumienė & Marius Aleinikovas & Benas Šilinskas & Aidanas Perkumas, 2024. "Exploring the Tourist Experience of the Majorelle Garden Using VADER-Based Sentiment Analysis and the Latent Dirichlet Allocation Algorithm: The Case of TripAdvisor Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-36, July.
    7. Axel Marx, 2019. "Public-Private Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Exploring Their Design and Its Impact on Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-9, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Üstüner Birben & Osman Devrim Elvan & Aynur Aydın & Dalia Perkumienė & Mindaugas Škėma & Marius Aleinikovas, 2025. "Property Rights for Forest Carbon: A Conceptual Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Huang, Zhilin & Li, Xiang & Chen, Jialing & Zhang, Dingfeng, 2024. "Does the Three-Year Action Plan for Winning the Blue Sky Defense Battle implementation enabling the high-quality development of regional energy? A quasi-natural experiment from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    3. Ronit Mukherji, 2023. "Risk Sharing in Public-Private Partnerships," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Abdulkarim Hasan Rashed & Afzal Shah, 2021. "The role of private sector in the implementation of sustainable development goals," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 2931-2948, March.
    5. Bireswar Dutta, 2025. "Evaluation of Political and Economic Factors Affecting Energy Policies: Addressing Contemporary Challenges from Taiwan’s Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Cao, Fuguo & Li, Runyu & Guo, Shaobo, 2024. "Rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships in China: A sustainable public procurement perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Maia, Iná E.N. & Harringer, Daniel & Kranzl, Lukas, 2024. "Household budget restrictions as reason for staged retrofits: A case study in Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    8. Jesús Rodríguez-Molina & José-Fernán Martínez & Pedro Castillejo & Gregorio Rubio, 2017. "Development of Middleware Applied to Microgrids by Means of an Open Source Enterprise Service Bus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-50, February.
    9. Su, Yuqi & Tian, Gary Gang & Li, Hai-Chao & Ding, Chante Jian, 2024. "Climate risk and corporate energy strategies: Unveiling the Inverted-N relationship," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    10. Jens Horbach, 2024. "Green energy transition in Europe: Importance and behaviour of private households," SEEDS Working Papers 0224, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Feb 2024.
    11. Stella Pfisterer & Rob Van Tulder, 2020. "Navigating Governance Tensions to Enhance the Impact of Partnerships with the Private Sector for the SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Emanuel George Mesteru, 2025. "Sustainability in the Management of the Private Medical Sector in Romania: A European, USA and Japan Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-27, June.
    13. Gabriel Castelblanco & Jose Guevara & Harrison Mesa & Diego Flores, 2020. "Risk Allocation in Unsolicited and Solicited Road Public-Private Partnerships: Sustainability and Management Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    14. Abimbola A. Adebayo & Kris Lulofs & Michiel Adriaan Heldeweg, 2023. "Indicators, Strategies, and Rule Settings for Sustainable Public–Private Infrastructure Partnerships: From Literature Review towards Institutional Designs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-26, June.
    15. Cristina - Iuliana PETROVAN (MARANDA), 2023. "Public-Private Partnership'S Ascent And Fall In Europe," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 32(2), pages 48-58, December.
    16. Gayoung Choi & Taeyoung Jin & Yoonjeong Jeong & Sue Kyoung Lee, 2020. "Evolution of Partnerships for Sustainable Development: The Case of P4G," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    17. Kezban Ayran Cihan & Nurdan Değirmenci, 2025. "The Effects of Schooling Rates and Income Levels on Energy Consumption in Households: A Panel Data Analysis on OECD Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 5271-5294, March.
    18. Hunggul Yudono Setio Hadi Nugroho & Yonky Indrajaya & Satria Astana & Murniati & Sri Suharti & Tyas Mutiara Basuki & Tri Wira Yuwati & Pamungkas Buana Putra & Budi Hadi Narendra & Luthfy Abdulah & Tit, 2023. "A Chronicle of Indonesia’s Forest Management: A Long Step towards Environmental Sustainability and Community Welfare," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-62, June.
    19. Asha Ally Hatibu & Essegbemon Akpo & Gerald Alex Lukurugu & Joseph Nzunda & Patrick Okori & Chris O. Ojiewo, 2022. "Upscaling Groundnut Seed Production and Delivery through Long-Term Public–Private and Development Organization Partnerships: Experiences from Tanzania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Lia Marchi & Jacopo Gaspari, 2023. "Energy Conservation at Home: A Critical Review on the Role of End-User Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5006-:d:1667664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.