IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5360-d1675937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability in the Management of the Private Medical Sector in Romania: A European, USA and Japan Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Emanuel George Mesteru

    (The Department of Management Marketing and Business Administration, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550324 Sibiu, Romania)

Abstract

The private healthcare sector in Romania, led by prominent players such as Medlife, Regina Maria, Medicover and Sanador, has become a cornerstone of the country’s healthcare system. However, achieving sustainability in this sector remains a challenge. This study evaluates sustainability practices in Romania’s private medical sector using the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) framework, comparing them to those of the EU, USA and Japan. Using statistical methods and benchmarking, we identify correlations between healthcare expenditures, financing schemes and sustainability metrics. A bibliographic review highlights global trends in sustainable healthcare management, including environmental, social and economic strategies and provides insights into the cost-effectiveness of green initiatives. Special focus is given to the role of technology in driving sustainability through innovations in telemedicine, digital health records and operational optimization. Using statistical methods (Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients), we have performed an analysis of health expenditure data for EU countries, the USA and Japan. The dataset was extracted from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) data portal and included various health expenditure indicators, financing schemes and administrative data for all EU countries, the USA and Japan for the period 2018–2023. We have performed a structured analysis that explores correlations between these indicators, with a focus on financial schemes, expenditures and management sustainability. The analysis shows strong correlations between healthcare expenditures, financing schemes and administrative costs. Countries with efficient governance, balanced financing and proactive population health strategies (e.g., Japan and Nordic countries) demonstrate better management sustainability. However, countries like the USA and Eastern EU nations face challenges due to high administrative costs and inefficient financing models, respectively. Addressing these issues is critical to sustaining healthcare systems in the long term. The findings reveal that while Romanian providers excel in patient satisfaction and technological innovation, they lag behind their European counterparts in environmental sustainability and equitable access. Recommendations are proposed to address these gaps, drawing on successful strategies implemented in other European healthcare systems. This study fills a gap in the literature by providing a structured analysis of sustainability practices in Romania’s private healthcare sector, contextualized within a global comparative framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Emanuel George Mesteru, 2025. "Sustainability in the Management of the Private Medical Sector in Romania: A European, USA and Japan Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-27, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5360-:d:1675937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5360/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5360/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5360-:d:1675937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.