IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4893-d1664986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Digital Social Support on Farmers’ Behavior of Resource Utilization of Plantation Wastes

Author

Listed:
  • Haoyi Ma

    (College of Economics and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Xiaoli Yang

    (College of Economics and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Yanfeng Wang

    (Institute of Rural Development, Liaoning Academy of Social Sciences, Shenyang 110031, China)

Abstract

Waste resource utilization is an important initiative in regard to promoting the development of green, low-carbon, and recycling activities in agriculture. Exploring the impact of digital social support on farmers’ waste resource utilization behavior is conducive to solving the challenges brought about by the current rapid development of the plantation industry. Based on survey data concerning 1213 farmers in Liaoning Province, this paper empirically analyzes the influence of digital social support on plantation farmers’ waste resource utilization behavior using a standard Poisson regression model and explores the roles of information comprehension and self-efficacy and the moderating role of narrow framing in the process. The results show that, firstly, digital social support had a significant positive effect on farmers’ plantation waste resource utilization behavior, and this conclusion was still valid after solving the endogenous problems. For the robustness test, every unit increase in digital social support increased the expected value of farmers’ waste resource utilization behavior by about 22.14%. Secondly, digital social support influenced farmers’ plantation waste resource utilization behavior by improving their information comprehension ability and self-efficacy. Thirdly, narrow framing will weaken the positive effect of digital social support on farmers’ plantation waste resource utilization behavior. Finally, based on the results of the heterogeneity analysis of the degree of land fragmentation and the concept of face, the influence of digital social support on the utilization of waste resources had a significant positive effect on the farmers with a low degree of land fragmentation and a strong concept of face. Therefore, the government and the agricultural sector should strengthen digital infrastructure, actively establish digital sharing platforms, and provide personalized digital social support to farmers so that they can actively engage in waste resource utilization and contribute to green and sustainable agricultural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Haoyi Ma & Xiaoli Yang & Yanfeng Wang, 2025. "Effects of Digital Social Support on Farmers’ Behavior of Resource Utilization of Plantation Wastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4893-:d:1664986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4893/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4893/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fengwan Zhang & Wenfeng Zhou & Jia He & Chen Qing & Dingde Xu, 2023. "Effects of Land Transfer on Farmer Households’ Straw Resource Utilization in Rural Western China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Jingyi Ding & Kun Song & Kuan Zhang & Xin Deng, 2025. "Impact of Farm Size on Farmers’ Recycling of Pesticide Packaging Waste: Evidence from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Yuhan Zhang & Mengling Zhang & Zhenlin Weng & Xueping Gao & Wenmei Liao, 2023. "The Influence of Social Norms and Environmental Regulations on Rural Households’ Pesticide Packaging Waste Disposal Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Chen, Chao C. & Greene, Patricia Gene & Crick, Ann, 1998. "Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 295-316, July.
    5. Yixuan Wang & Xingle Long & Liang Li & Qinglin Wang & Xiping Ding & Sijia Cai, 2021. "Extending theory of planned behavior in household waste sorting in China: the moderating effect of knowledge, personal involvement, and moral responsibility," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7230-7250, May.
    6. Shengnan Huang & Ehsan Elahi, 2022. "Farmers’ Preferences for Recycling Pesticide Packaging Waste: An Implication of a Discrete Choice Experiment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haixin Tao & Liming Fang & Jiaying Lu & Xuezhu Shi, 2025. "The Impact of Digital Literacy on Farmers’ Pesticide Packaging Waste Recycling Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Maw–Der Foo & Marilyn A. Uy & Charles Murnieks, 2015. "Beyond Affective Valence: Untangling Valence and Activation Influences on Opportunity Identification," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(2), pages 407-431, March.
    3. Aurora A.C. Teixeira & Rosa Portela Forte, 2009. "Unbounding entrepreneurial intents of university students: a multidisciplinary perspective," FEP Working Papers 322, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    4. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Cai, Xiang & Adjei, Mavis & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Obuobi, Bright, 2022. "Citizens’ intention to invest in municipal solid waste to energy projects in Ghana: The impact of direct and indirect effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    5. Patzelt, Holger & zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, Dodo & Fischer, Heiko T., 2009. "Upper echelons and portfolio strategies of venture capital firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 558-572, November.
    6. Jenny Lukito Setiawan & Azilah Kasim & Elia Ardyan, 2022. "Understanding the Consumers of Entrepreneurial Education: Self-Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Attitude Orientation among Youths," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Zellweger, Thomas & Sieger, Philipp & Halter, Frank, 2011. "Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 521-536, September.
    8. Ratan J. S. Dheer & Aycan Kara, 2024. "Immigrants’ entrepreneurial intentions: acculturation-based socio-psychological lens," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2979-2999, December.
    9. Pushkarskaya, Helen & Fortunato, Michael W.-P. & Breazeale, Nicole & Just, David R., 2021. "Enhancing measures of ESE to incorporate aspects of place: Personal reputation and place-based social legitimacy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(3).
    10. Tingko Lee & Chih-Hsing Liu & Bernard Gan & Cheng-Kuei Yang, 2025. "The double-edged sword of narcissism: influences of university students’ grandiose and vulnerable narcissism on entrepreneurial intention," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 333-369, March.
    11. António Porfírio, José & Augusto Felício, José & Carrilho, Tiago & Jardim, Jacinto, 2023. "Promoting entrepreneurial intentions from adolescence: The influence of entrepreneurial culture and education," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Hsu, Dan K. & Burmeister-Lamp, Katrin & Simmons, Sharon A. & Foo, Maw-Der & Hong, Michelle C. & Pipes, Jesse D., 2019. "“I know I can, but I don't fit”: Perceived fit, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 311-326.
    13. Krzysztof Zięba & Jakub Golik, 2018. "Testing Students’ Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy as an Early Predictor of Entrepreneurial Activities. Evidence From the SEAS Project," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 14(1), pages 91-108.
    14. Noorita Mohammad & Basri Badyalina & Shahira Ariffin & Nani Ilyana Syafie & Intan Syafinas Mat Shafie & Khamisah Abd Manaf, 2024. "Young People's Involvement in Reused Cooking Oil," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(2), pages 19-27.
    15. Justin R. Hall & Selen Savas-Hall & Eric H. Shaw, 2023. "A deductive approach to a systematic review of entrepreneurship literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 987-1016, September.
    16. Ammad Zafar & Khalid Iraqi & Sadaf Mustafa, 2017. "Analysis of Role of Educational Institutions in Development of Entrepreneurs (A Case Study of Karachi)," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(1), pages 95-110, January.
    17. Chen, Xi & Zhang, Stephen X., 2024. "Too much of two good things: The curvilinear effects of self-efficacy and market validation in new ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    18. Ju Xu & Yitu Fu & Xueying Zhang, 2023. "Does entrepreneurship education in China develop entrepreneurial intention? the role of self-efficacy and experience," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-24, July.
    19. Samir Marwan Hammami & Tareq Muhammad Alhousary & Ahmad Taha Kahwaji & Syed Ahsan Jamil, 2022. "The status quo of omani female entrepreneurs: a story of multidimensional success factors," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2063-2089, August.
    20. Francisco Liñán & Yi-Wen Chen, 2006. "Testing the Entrepreneurial Intention Model on a Two-Country Sample," Working Papers 0607, Departament Empresa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, revised Jul 2006.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4893-:d:1664986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.