IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4679-d1659684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Littering Behaviour in Multicultural Slums: A Case Study from Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Patrícia Silva

    (Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

  • Mário Ramos

    (Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
    MARE—Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre/Associate Laboratory ARNET—Aquatic Research Network, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Ana Alves

    (Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
    MARE—Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre/Associate Laboratory ARNET—Aquatic Research Network, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Graça Martinho

    (Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
    MARE—Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre/Associate Laboratory ARNET—Aquatic Research Network, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Morro do Banco , a slum in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, is home to a community composed mainly of Brazilian and Venezuelan nationals, where littering is a persistent issue. This study investigates the causes of littering and examines the differences in perceptions and littering behaviours between residents, addressing a research gap in multicultural slums. A face-to-face survey was conducted with 150 residents, complemented by interviews with community members and professionals from urban cleaning and waste management services. Visual observations were also made. The results indicate that littering is primarily linked to a lack of containers for waste disposal and collection, as well as residents’ failure to dispose of waste at the designated times. There is a notable absence of awareness campaigns aimed at addressing the problem. While both communities recognise the littering issue, Venezuelan residents are less aware of public services and report observing lower levels of littering than Brazilian residents. Furthermore, Brazilians tend to place more responsibility on local authorities, while Venezuelans attribute responsibility to the central government. Venezuelans also express less support for oversight actions involving penalties compared to Brazilians. These findings highlight the need for targeted awareness campaigns and inclusive policies to effectively tackle littering in multicultural slums.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrícia Silva & Mário Ramos & Ana Alves & Graça Martinho, 2025. "Littering Behaviour in Multicultural Slums: A Case Study from Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4679-:d:1659684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4679/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4679/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruggero Rangoni & Wander Jager, 2017. "Social Dynamics of Littering and Adaptive Cleaning Strategies Explored Using Agent-Based Modelling," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 20(2), pages 1-1.
    2. Romero, Cláudia Buhamra Abreu & Laroche, Michel & Aurup, Golam Mohammad & Ferraz, Sofia Batista, 2018. "Ethnicity and acculturation of environmental attitudes and behaviors: A cross-cultural study with Brazilians in Canada," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 300-309.
    3. Thaisa Comelli & Isabelle Anguelovski & Eric Chu, 2018. "Socio-spatial legibility, discipline, and gentrification through favela upgrading in Rio de Janeiro," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5-6), pages 633-656, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Concari & Gerjo Kok & Pim Martens, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review of Concepts and Factors Related to Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviour in Relation to Waste Management Through an Interdisciplinary Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-50, May.
    2. Hou, Tingting & Luo, Xin (Robert) & Ke, Dan & Cheng, Xusen, 2022. "Exploring different appraisals in deviant sharing behaviors: A mixed-methods study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 496-509.
    3. Niamir, Leila & Filatova, Tatiana & Voinov, Alexey & Bressers, Hans, 2018. "Transition to low-carbon economy: Assessing cumulative impacts of individual behavioral changes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 325-345.
    4. Lei Ji & Chunlin Yuan & Taiwen Feng & Chen Wang, 2020. "Achieving the environmental profits of green supplier integration: The roles of supply chain resilience and knowledge combination," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 978-989, July.
    5. Van Asselt, Joanna & Nian, Yefan & Soh, Moonwon & Gao, Zhifeng & Morgan, Stephen N, 2020. "Do Plastic Warning Labels Reduce Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Plastic Packaging?," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304503, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Das, Manish & Jebarajakirthy, Dr Charles, 2020. "Impact of acculturation to western culture (AWC) on western fashion luxury consumption among Gen-Y consumers in the Asia-Pacific region," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    7. Aysegul Can & Alke Jenss & Hugo Fanton, 2024. "State‐Led Gentrification Against The Backdrop Of Urban Authoritarian Practices," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 689-696, July.
    8. Keiron P. Roberts & Sui C. Phang & John B. Williams & David J. Hutchinson & Simon E. Kolstoe & Jasper Bie & Ian D. Williams & Anne M. Stringfellow, 2022. "Increased personal protective equipment litter as a result of COVID-19 measures," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(3), pages 272-279, March.
    9. Shaoni Wang & Yanzhong Dang & Wander Jager & Kees Zoethout, 2025. "Autonomy or control? An agent-based study of self-organising versus centralised task allocation," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 1-28, May.
    10. Maria Atuesta Ortiz, 2023. "GAMONALES WHO MAKE A CITY: Intimate Interactions in City Building," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 90-105, January.
    11. Alsulami, Abdulkarim & Fairbrass, Jenny & Botelho, Tiago & Assadinia, Shahin, 2024. "Renewable energy and innovation in Saudi Arabia: An exploration of factors affecting consumers' intention to adopt Solar PV," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4679-:d:1659684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.