IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4676-d1659577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Data Elements and Enterprise Digital Transformation: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on Open Government Data Platforms for Sustainable Urban Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Wang

    (Economics School, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

  • Xiaohui Zhou

    (Economics School, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, China)

  • Yunning Ma

    (Smart Governance Program, Inha University, Incheon 22221, Republic of Korea)

  • Yongrok Choi

    (Department of International Trade, Inha University, Incheon 22221, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

In the era of digital economy, the open sharing of public data elements has become a key engine driving the digital transformation of enterprises. This article is based on a quasi-natural experiment using government data platforms launched from 2011 to 2022, and it uses the asymptotic difference-in-differences method to empirically test the mechanism and impact of public data elements on enterprise digital transformation. It has been discovered that making data items publicly available dramatically increases the degree of enterprise digital transformation. According to mechanism analysis, corporate digital transformation is primarily impacted by releasing public data elements through two channels: information resource sharing and removing financial restraints. According to heterogeneity analysis, public data elements significantly impact enterprise digital transformation when they are located in regions with high data openness quality, when they are located in regions with substantial levels of digital economic vitality, and when they are available during businesses’ growth and maturity stages. The enabling influence of public data elements on organizational digital transformation was positively mitigated via a fully functional digital infrastructure and cutting-edge digital products. This study has confirmed the driving value of the market-oriented allocation of data elements in the digital transformation of enterprises, providing a theoretical basis for improving the government’s data openness system and unleashing the productivity of data elements. It also provides practical inspiration for enterprises to seize digital opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Wang & Xiaohui Zhou & Yunning Ma & Yongrok Choi, 2025. "Public Data Elements and Enterprise Digital Transformation: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on Open Government Data Platforms for Sustainable Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-32, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4676-:d:1659577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4676/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4676/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beatriz Kira & Vikram Sinha & Sharmadha Srinivasan, 2021. "Regulating digital ecosystems: bridging the gap between competition policy and data protection [Merger policy in digital markets: an ex post assessment]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(5), pages 1337-1360.
    2. Chen, Kaixuan & Zhang, Shushan, 2024. "How does open public data impact enterprise digital transformation?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 178-190.
    3. Nathan Nunn & Nancy Qian, 2014. "US Food Aid and Civil Conflict," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(6), pages 1630-1666, June.
    4. Huang, Jie & Lu, Hongyang & Du, Minzhe, 2025. "Can digital economy narrow the regional economic gap? Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Xie, Yu & Chen, Zhen & Boadu, Francis & Tang, HongJuan, 2022. "How does digital transformation affect agricultural enterprises’ pro-land behavior: The role of environmental protection cognition and cross-border search," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Shan, Junhui & Zhang, Lin & Wang, Junkai, 2025. "Data elements and corporate stock dividends: A quasi-natural experiment based on government data openness," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    7. Xuejun Jin & Xiao Pan, 2023. "Government Attention, Market Competition and Firm Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, June.
    8. Verhoef, Peter C. & Broekhuizen, Thijs & Bart, Yakov & Bhattacharya, Abhi & Qi Dong, John & Fabian, Nicolai & Haenlein, Michael, 2021. "Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 889-901.
    9. Richard R. Nelson, 1982. "The Role of Knowledge in R&D Efficiency," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 97(3), pages 453-470.
    10. Hui Li & Jiaqiang Xu, 2024. "Impact of Digital Government on Digital Transformation of Enterprises from the Perspective of Urban Economic Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    11. Zhongzhen Yang & Jionghao Li, 2024. "Towards Green and Smart Cities: Urban Transport and Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-5, January.
    12. Qian, Yifan, 2025. "Public data openness and corporate total factor productivity," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 733-753.
    13. Chen, Zhe & Cao, Yushan & Liao, Kaicheng, 2024. "How state-owned equity participation promotes the digital transformation of nonstate-owned enterprises: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    14. Yan, Lina & Ling, Xuan & Wang, Zhitao & Xu, Yinuo, 2023. "Can mixed-ownership reform boost the digital transformation of state-owned enterprises?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 647-663.
    15. Toni M. Whited & Guojun Wu, 2006. "Financial Constraints Risk," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 19(2), pages 531-559.
    16. Zhong, Yuan & Lai, Huisu & Zhang, Liang & Guo, Lixiang & Lai, Xiaobing, 2025. "Does public data openness accelerate new quality productive forces? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1409-1427.
    17. Erik Brynjolfsson & Kristina McElheran, 2016. "The Rapid Adoption of Data-Driven Decision-Making," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 133-139, May.
    18. Anthony, Joseph H. & Ramesh, K., 1992. "Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices : A test of the life cycle hypothesis," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2-3), pages 203-227, August.
    19. Cao, Jing & Ho, Mun S. & Ma, Rong & Teng, Fei, 2021. "When carbon emission trading meets a regulated industry: Evidence from the electricity sector of China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    20. Si Luo & Miaochao Chen, 2022. "Digital Finance Development and the Digital Transformation of Enterprises: Based on the Perspective of Financing Constraint and Innovation Drive," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ding, Jiantao & Yin, Yingkai & Kuang, Jinsong & Ding, Dezhi & Madsen, Dag.Øivind & Yang, Kunyu, 2024. "The impact of enterprise digital transformation on financial mismatch: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Chen, Zhe & Cao, Yushan & Liao, Kaicheng, 2024. "How state-owned equity participation promotes the digital transformation of nonstate-owned enterprises: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Yang, Hefan & Liu, Xilu & Meng, Yao & Feng, Baoyi & Chen, Zhijun, 2024. "Digital transformation and the allocation of decision-making rights within business groups – Empirical evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Li, Xin & Liu, Zhaoda & Ye, Yongwei, 2024. "Public data and corporate employment: Evidence from the launch of Chinese public data platform," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 124-144.
    5. Wu, Desheng & Xie, Yu, 2024. "Unveiling the impact of public data access on collaborative reduction of pollutants and carbon emissions: Evidence from open government data policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Jun Liu & Ziwei Wang & Changjin Li & Ruofan Xu, 2024. "Exploring pathways to digital transformation: fsQCA analysis based on the AMO framework," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Wang, Weilong & Xiao, Deheng & Wang, Jianlong & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The cost of pollution in the digital era: Impediments of air pollution on enterprise digital transformation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Du, Juntao & Shen, Zhiyang & Song, Malin & Zhang, Linda, 2023. "Nexus between digital transformation and energy technology innovation: An empirical test of A-share listed enterprises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    9. Cheng, Linyin, 2024. "Does digital transformation matter for trade credit provision? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    10. Xin Tan & Jinfang Jiao & Ming Jiang & Ming Chen & Wenpeng Wang & Yijun Sun, 2024. "Digital Policy, Green Innovation, and Digital-Intelligent Transformation of Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-23, August.
    11. Zhang, Ruchuan & Gao, Weiyan & Chen, Shanshan & Zhou, Li & Li, Aijun, 2024. "Dose digital transformation contribute to improving financing efficiency? Evidence and implications for energy enterprises in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    12. Shao, Yanmin & Xu, Kunliang & Shan, Yuan George, 2024. "Leveraging corporate digitalization for green technology innovation: The mediating role of resource endowments," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    13. Shizhong Peng & Haoran Peng & Shirong Pan & Jun Wu, 2023. "Digital Transformation, Green Innovation, and Pollution Abatement: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Zhou, Bo & Ding, Hao, 2023. "How public attention drives corporate environmental protection: Effects and channels," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Wang, Sai & Wen, Wen & Niu, Yuhao & Li, Xin, 2024. "Digital transformation and corporate labor investment efficiency," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    16. Zhao, Tianjiao & Xiao, Xiang, 2019. "The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial constraints: Does the life cycle stage of a firm matter?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 76-93.
    17. Changling Sun & Ziang Lin & Marek Vochozka & Zuzana Vincúrová, 2022. "Digital transformation and corporate cash holdings in China’s A-share listed companies," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 1081-1116, December.
    18. Ren, Yi-Shuai & Klein, Tony & Jiang, Yong, 2024. "Monetary policy uncertainty and green investment decisions: A cross-national spillover perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    19. Wang, Dingqing & Liao, Hongwei & Wang, Xinyue, 2024. "The enabling effects of digital technology on the quality of firm development: Insights and implications," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    20. Xiangyu Chen & Peng Wan & Zhefeng Ma & Yu Yang, 2024. "Does corporate digital transformation restrain ESG decoupling? Evidence from China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4676-:d:1659577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.