IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3868-d1388778.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Always with the Best Intentions? Interrogating the Use of Sustainable Building Assessment Systems in Developing Countries: Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Faith Ng’eno Chelang’at

    (Department of Architecture, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O. Box 62000, Nairobi 00200, Kenya)

  • Ranald Lawrence

    (The Liverpool School of Architecture, University of Liverpool, 25 Abercromby Square, Liverpool L69 7ZN, UK)

Abstract

Assessment methodologies such as BREEAM and LEED allocate points based on prescribed interventions that promote design features or strategies considered to be more sustainable than others. A focus on accumulating numerical scores, however, often fails to address pertinent contextual issues, particularly within developing countries. This paper examines the use of four assessment systems in Kenya—two international systems, LEED-US and Green Star SA-Kenya; and two locally developed systems, Green Mark Kenya and the Safari Green Building Index. The paper compares the relative weighting of different categories under each system, and assesses their appropriateness to a Kenyan context, with reference to the suitability of active technology versus passive design approaches. The paper examines selected examples of ‘green’ buildings in Nairobi, reflecting on the influence of different methods of assessment on the adopted design approaches. The paper argues that international rating systems, such as LEED, often focus on a Western construct of sustainability featuring a systematic bias towards global rather than local perspectives, with an emphasis on physical environmental factors. In pursuit of objectivity, the measurement of non-contextual parameters untailored to local circumstances (e.g., energy performance) is prioritised at the expense of those contingent on local conditions or climate.

Suggested Citation

  • Faith Ng’eno Chelang’at & Ranald Lawrence, 2024. "Always with the Best Intentions? Interrogating the Use of Sustainable Building Assessment Systems in Developing Countries: Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3868-:d:1388778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3868/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3868/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menezes, Anna Carolina & Cripps, Andrew & Bouchlaghem, Dino & Buswell, Richard, 2012. "Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 355-364.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Habtamu Tkubet Ebuy & Hind Bril El Haouzi & Riad Benelmir & Remi Pannequin, 2023. "Occupant Behavior Impact on Building Sustainability Performance: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Anti Hamburg & Targo Kalamees, 2018. "The Influence of Energy Renovation on the Change of Indoor Temperature and Energy Use," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Jakob Carlander & Bahram Moshfegh & Jan Akander & Fredrik Karlsson, 2020. "Effects on Energy Demand in an Office Building Considering Location, Orientation, Façade Design and Internal Heat Gains—A Parametric Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Alencastro, João & Fuertes, Alba & de Wilde, Pieter, 2018. "The relationship between quality defects and the thermal performance of buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 883-894.
    5. Prasanna, Ashreeta & Dorer, Viktor & Vetterli, Nadège, 2017. "Optimisation of a district energy system with a low temperature network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 632-648.
    6. Zhong, Shengyuan & Zhao, Jun & Li, Wenjia & Li, Hao & Deng, Shuai & Li, Yang & Hussain, Sajjad & Wang, Xiaoyuan & Zhu, Jiebei, 2021. "Quantitative analysis of information interaction in building energy systems based on mutual information," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Eugene Mohareb & Arman Hashemi & Mehdi Shahrestani & Minna Sunikka-Blank, 2017. "Retrofit Planning for the Performance Gap: Results of a Workshop on Addressing Energy, Health and Comfort Needs in a Protected Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Pierryves Padey & Kyriaki Goulouti & Guy Wagner & Blaise Périsset & Sébastien Lasvaux, 2021. "Understanding the Reasons behind the Energy Performance Gap of an Energy-Efficient Building, through a Probabilistic Approach and On-Site Measurements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Gupta, Rajat & Kotopouleas, Alkis, 2018. "Magnitude and extent of building fabric thermal performance gap in UK low energy housing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 673-686.
    10. Wang, Lan & Lee, Eric W.M. & Hussian, Syed Asad & Yuen, Anthony Chun Yin & Feng, Wei, 2021. "Quantitative impact analysis of driving factors on annual residential building energy end-use combining machine learning and stochastic methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    11. De Boeck, L. & Verbeke, S. & Audenaert, A. & De Mesmaeker, L., 2015. "Improving the energy performance of residential buildings: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 960-975.
    12. Abdulazeez Rotimi & Ali Bahadori-Jahromi & Anastasia Mylona & Paulina Godfrey & Darren Cook, 2017. "Estimation and Validation of Energy Consumption in UK Existing Hotel Building Using Dynamic Simulation Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Li, Xinyi & Yao, Runming & Li, Qin & Ding, Yong & Li, Baizhan, 2018. "An object-oriented energy benchmark for the evaluation of the office building stock," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-11.
    14. Qadeer Ali & Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem & Fahim Ullah & Samad M. E. Sepasgozar, 2020. "The Performance Gap in Energy-Efficient Office Buildings: How the Occupants Can Help?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Azar, Elie & Nikolopoulou, Christina & Papadopoulos, Sokratis, 2016. "Integrating and optimizing metrics of sustainable building performance using human-focused agent-based modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 926-937.
    16. Ji, Changyoon & Hong, Taehoon & Kim, Hakpyeong, 2022. "Statistical analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of South Korean residential buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    17. Zulay Giménez & Claudio Mourgues & Luis F. Alarcón & Harrison Mesa & Eugenio Pellicer, 2020. "Value Analysis Model to Support the Building Design Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Naylor, Sophie & Gillott, Mark & Lau, Tom, 2018. "A review of occupant-centric building control strategies to reduce building energy use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 1-10.
    19. Lü, Xiaoshu & Lu, Tao & Kibert, Charles J. & Viljanen, Martti, 2014. "A novel dynamic modeling approach for predicting building energy performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 91-103.
    20. Zhao, Dong-Xue & He, Bao-Jie & Johnson, Christine & Mou, Ben, 2015. "Social problems of green buildings: From the humanistic needs to social acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1594-1609.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3868-:d:1388778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.