IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p1996-d1347966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conservation, Livelihoods, and Agrifood Systems in Papua and Jambi, Indonesia: A Case for Diverse Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Angga Dwiartama

    (School of Life Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB), Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Zulfikar Ali Akbar

    (School of Life Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB), Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Rhino Ariefiansyah

    (Department of Anthropology, University of Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Hendra Kurniawan Maury

    (Department of Biology, University of Cendrawasih, Jayapura 99224, Indonesia)

  • Sari Ramadhan

    (School of Life Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB), Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

Abstract

Community-based conservation in Indonesia is seamlessly intertwined with rural livelihoods and agriculture and food (agrifood) systems. In bridging conservation and livelihood, the state often imposes market-based mechanisms and value chain linkages onto smallholder farmers, which disparages other forms of livelihood strategies and modes of production. This paper, therefore, aims to document the diverse economies within forest-dependent communities that enable them to autonomously build a sustainable livelihood and contribute to conservation. We used Gibson-Graham’s diverse economies approach as a framework to understand the ways in which the diversity of economic means (subsistence, market-based, alternative) goes beyond a mere livelihood strategy, but also acts as a basis for a more democratic and inclusive conservation practice. To capture these livelihood stories, we employed participatory rural appraisal (PRA), in-depth semi-structured interviews with 89 key informants (including smallholder farmers, household members, community leaders, village officials, elders, and youths), and visual ethnographic approaches in six villages adjacent to forest areas in two provinces in Indonesia (Jambi and Papua). We conclude by emphasizing how the diverse economies approach helps in understanding the ways in which the local communities seamlessly move beyond various agrifood systems and modes of economies, while making the case that what emerges from this space of possibilities is an ethics, and politics, of care toward forest conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Angga Dwiartama & Zulfikar Ali Akbar & Rhino Ariefiansyah & Hendra Kurniawan Maury & Sari Ramadhan, 2024. "Conservation, Livelihoods, and Agrifood Systems in Papua and Jambi, Indonesia: A Case for Diverse Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1996-:d:1347966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1996/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1996/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irma Yeny & Raden Garsetiasih & Sri Suharti & Hendra Gunawan & Reny Sawitri & Endang Karlina & Budi Hadi Narendra & Surati & Sulistya Ekawati & Deden Djaenudin & Dony Rachmanadi & Nur Muhammad Heriyan, 2022. "Examining the Socio-Economic and Natural Resource Risks of Food Estate Development on Peatlands: A Strategy for Economic Recovery and Natural Resource Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, March.
    2. Prabhu L. Pingali, 1997. "From Subsistence to Commercial Production Systems: The Transformation of Asian Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(2), pages 628-634.
    3. Eric R. Sarmiento, 2017. "Synergies in alternative food network research: embodiment, diverse economies, and more-than-human food geographies," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(2), pages 485-497, June.
    4. Martin Wiegand & Eric Koomen & Menno Pradhan & Christopher Edmonds, 2023. "The Impact of Road Development on Household Welfare in Rural Papua New Guinea," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(6), pages 933-953, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muricho, G. & Kulundu, D. & Sule, F., 2018. "Impact Assessment of Agricultural Commercialization on Food Security Among Smallholder Farmers in Kenya: An Application of Correlated Random Effects," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277325, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Kimenju, Simon C. & Tschirley, David L., 2008. "Agriculture and Livelihood Diversification in Kenyan Rural Households," Working Papers 202614, Egerton University, Tegemeo Institute of Agricultural Policy and Development.
    3. Emily Schmidt & Rachel Gilbert & Brian Holtemeyer & Kristi Mahrt, 2021. "Poverty analysis in the lowlands of Papua New Guinea underscores climate vulnerability and need for income flexibility," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(1), pages 171-191, January.
    4. Randy Stringer & Prabhu Pingali, 2004. "Agriculture's Contributions to Economic and Social Development," The Electronic Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vol. 1(1), pages 1-5.
    5. Shinichi Kitano, 2021. "Estimation of Determinants of Farmland Abandonment and Its Data Problems," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Yang Qi & Mingyue Gao & Haoyu Wang & Huijie Ding & Jianxu Liu & Songsak Sriboonchitta, 2023. "Does Marketization Promote High-Quality Agricultural Development in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-28, June.
    7. Gebremedhin, Berhanu & Jaleta, Moti, 2013. "Policy Imperatives of Commercial Transformation of Smallholders: Market Orientation Versus market Participation in Ethiopia," 2013 Fourth International Conference, September 22-25, 2013, Hammamet, Tunisia 160580, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    8. Govereh, Jones & Jayne, Thomas S., 1999. "Effects of Cash Crop Production on Food Crop Productivity in Zimbabwe: Synergies or Trade-Offs?," Food Security International Development Policy Syntheses 11371, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    9. Demeke, Leykun & Haji, Jemma, 2014. "Econometric analysis of factors affecting market participation of smallholder farming in Central Ethiopia," MPRA Paper 77024, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Muricho, Geoffrey & Manda, Damiano & Sule, Fredrick & Kassie, Menale, 2017. "Smallholder Agricultural Commercialization and Poverty: Empirical Evidence of Panel Data from Kenya," 91st Annual Conference, April 24-26, 2017, Royal Dublin Society, Dublin, Ireland 258618, Agricultural Economics Society.
    11. Harry G. West, 2022. "Terroir products: a movable heritage feast?," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 1-27, March.
    12. Prosser, Luke & Thomas Lane, Eifiona & Jones, Rebecca, 2021. "Collaboration for innovative routes to market: COVID-19 and the food system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Bathrick, David D., 1998. "Fostering global well-being: a new paradigm to revitalize agricultural and rural development," 2020 vision discussion papers 26, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Sirak Bahta & Amos Omore & Darek Baker & Iheanacho Okike & Berhanu Gebremedhin & Francis Wanyoike, 0. "An Analysis of Technical Efficiency in the Presence of Developments Toward Commercialization: Evidence from Tanzania’s Milk Producers," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    15. Lenjiso, Birhanu Megersa & Smits, Jeroen & Ruben, Ruerd, 2016. "Smallholder milk market participation, dietary diversity and nutritional status among young children in Ethiopia," Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender), Africa Centre for Gender, Social Research and Impact Assessment, vol. 1(2).
    16. Muhammed Abdella Usman & Daniel Callo-Concha, 2021. "Does market access improve dietary diversity and food security? Evidence from Southwestern Ethiopian smallholder coffee producers," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Zhang, Xiaobo & Yang, Jin & Reardon, Thomas, 2020. "Mechanization outsourcing clusters and division of labor in Chinese agriculture," IFPRI book chapters, in: An evolving paradigm of agricultural mechanization development: How much can Africa learn from Asia?, chapter 2, pages 71-96, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    18. Raj K. GC & Ralph P. Hall, 2020. "The Commercialization of Smallholder Farming—A Case Study from the Rural Western Middle Hills of Nepal," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Montalbano, P. & Pietrelli, R. & Salvatici, L., 2018. "Participation in the market chain and food security: The case of the Ugandan maize farmers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 81-98.
    20. World Bank Group, 2020. "Papua New Guinea Economic Update, July 2020," World Bank Publications - Reports 34079, The World Bank Group.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1996-:d:1347966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.