IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1162-d1329514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends in the Water–Energy–Food Nexus Research

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Rhouma

    (PRIMA, Nexus 2 Building, C/Jordi Girona 29, Second Floor 2A, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Jerome El Jeitany

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (DICEA), Univpersità degli Studi di Firenze, Via di S. Marta 3, 50139 Firenze, Italy
    Landscape Ecology and Environmental Systems Analysis, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamper Street 19c, 38092 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Rabi Mohtar

    (Biological and Agricultural Engineering and Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Energy Institute Texas A&M University, 306 Scoates Hall, Mail Stop 2117, College Station, TX 77843-2117, USA
    Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon)

  • José Maria Gil

    (Centre de Recerca en Economia i Desenvolupament Agroalimentari, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the scientific evolution and research trends concerning the water–energy–food (WEF) nexus, as well as its development within scientific databases. To achieve this, a bibliometric analysis has been conducted using publications sourced from Scopus and Web of science databases. This study examined key aspects such as primary journals, prominent authors, affiliated institutions, countries of origin, subject areas, and notable keywords. Furthermore, there is a dedicated section that delves into research and innovation gaps within publications related to the WEF nexus. Results reveal that research on the WEF nexus has experienced exponential growth over the past decade, with the majority of publications emerging between 2017 and 2023. The United States leads in this field, with engineering and environmental science being the predominant research categories, with Spain and Italy being the prominent countries in Europe. The WEF nexus concept in the agriculture sector is notably underdeveloped, particularly in its ties with the Sustainable Development Goals and the science–policy–society interface. The study stresses the importance of integrating health considerations into the WEF Nexus to understand the interconnections and their implications on public health, thereby enriching the Nexus approach with a critical dimension of human well-being. This situation underscores the urgent need to create a nexus community that bridges science and practice, and to incorporate this specialized discipline into university curricula.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Rhouma & Jerome El Jeitany & Rabi Mohtar & José Maria Gil, 2024. "Trends in the Water–Energy–Food Nexus Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1162-:d:1329514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1162/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1162/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Víctor Correa-Porcel & Laura Piedra-Muñoz & Emilio Galdeano-Gómez, 2021. "Water–Energy–Food Nexus in the Agri-Food Sector: Research Trends and Innovating Practices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-31, December.
    2. Somayeh Rezaei Kalvani & Fulvio Celico, 2023. "The Water–Energy–Food Nexus in European Countries: A Review and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Elliot Noma, 1984. "Co‐citation analysis and the invisible college," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 35(1), pages 29-33, January.
    4. S. Phineas Upham & Henry Small, 2010. "Emerging research fronts in science and technology: patterns of new knowledge development," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(1), pages 15-38, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joel O. Botai & Christina M. Botai & Katlego P. Ncongwane & Sylvester Mpandeli & Luxon Nhamo & Muthoni Masinde & Abiodun M. Adeola & Michael G. Mengistu & Henerica Tazvinga & Miriam D. Murambadoro & S, 2021. "A Review of the Water–Energy–Food Nexus Research in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Xuefeng Wang & Shuo Zhang & Yuqin liu, 2022. "ITGInsight–discovering and visualizing research fronts in the scientific literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6509-6531, November.
    3. Keith D. Brouthers & Ram Mudambi & David M. Reeb, 2012. "The blockbuster hypothesis: influencing the boundaries of knowledge," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(3), pages 959-982, March.
    4. Li, Menghui & Yang, Liying & Zhang, Huina & Shen, Zhesi & Wu, Chensheng & Wu, Jinshan, 2017. "Do mathematicians, economists and biomedical scientists trace large topics more strongly than physicists?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 598-607.
    5. Lu, Kun & Yang, Guancan & Wang, Xue, 2022. "Topics emerged in the biomedical field and their characteristics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Liu, Xiang & Jiang, Tingting & Ma, Feicheng, 2013. "Collective dynamics in knowledge networks: Emerging trends analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 425-438.
    7. Roger Fouquet, 2012. "Economics of Energy and Climate Change: Origins, Developments and Growth," Working Papers 2012-08, BC3.
    8. Xiwen Liu & Xuezhao Wang & Lucheng Lyu & Yanpeng Wang, 2022. "Identifying disruptive technologies by integrating multi-source data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5325-5351, September.
    9. Reindert K. Buter & Ed. C. M. Noyons & Anthony F. J. Raan, 2011. "Searching for converging research using field to field citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(2), pages 325-338, February.
    10. Oleg Ena & Nadezhda Mikova & Ozcan Saritas & Anna Sokolova, 2016. "A methodology for technology trend monitoring: the case of semantic technologies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1013-1041, September.
    11. R. Fileto Maciel & P. Saskia Bayerl & Marta Macedo Kerr Pinheiro, 2019. "Technical research innovations of the US national security system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(2), pages 539-565, August.
    12. Duo Yang & Jincheng Zhou & Dingpu Shi & Qingna Pan & Dan Wang & Xiaohong Chen & Jiu Liu, 2022. "Research Status, Hotspots, and Evolutionary Trends of Global Digital Education via Knowledge Graph Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Kiran Kaur & Kwan Hoong Ng & Ray Kemp & Yin Yee Ong & Zaharah Ramly & Ai Peng Koh, 2019. "Knowledge generation in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 149-169, April.
    14. Pietronudo, Maria Cristina & Croidieu, Grégoire & Schiavone, Francesco, 2022. "A solution looking for problems? A systematic literature review of the rationalizing influence of artificial intelligence on decision-making in innovation management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    15. Worasak Klongthong & Veera Muangsin & Chupun Gowanit & Nongnuj Muangsin, 2021. "A Patent Analysis to Identify Emergent Topics and Convergence Fields: A Case Study of Chitosan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    16. Cobo, M.J. & López-Herrera, A.G. & Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F., 2011. "An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 146-166.
    17. Small, Henry & Boyack, Kevin W. & Klavans, Richard, 2014. "Identifying emerging topics in science and technology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1450-1467.
    18. Mu-Hsuan Huang & Chia-Pin Chang, 2016. "A comparative study on three citation windows for detecting research fronts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1835-1853, December.
    19. Yi-Ming Wei & Jin-Wei Wang & Tianqi Chen & Bi-Ying Yu & Hua Liao, 2018. "Frontiers of Low-Carbon Technologies: Results from Bibliographic Coupling with Sliding Window," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 116, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    20. Shuo Xu & Liyuan Hao & Xin An & Hongshen Pang & Ting Li, 2020. "Review on emerging research topics with key-route main path analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 607-624, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1162-:d:1329514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.