IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1069-d1326957.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Amphibious Architecture: A Biomimetic Design Approach to Flood Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Hope Ameh

    (School of Architecture and Environment, College of Arts Technology and Environment, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK)

  • Lidia Badarnah

    (School of Architecture and Environment, College of Arts Technology and Environment, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK)

  • Jessica Lamond

    (School of Architecture and Environment, College of Arts Technology and Environment, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK)

Abstract

Amphibious buildings use the buoyancy principle in the design of their foundation systems to mitigate flood impact. In some cases, amphibious buildings are fitted with mechanical systems that further aid the buoyancy element to temporarily raise the building and guide its descent to natural ground level. These mechanical systems require external operation, preventing the amphibious building from passively responding during flood events as is one of the requirements of a robust flood mitigation measure. Additionally, buildings in flood environments are often left with stains on the exterior facade from floodwater contamination from sewage and chemicals, among others. This paper distinguishes three main components of an amphibious foundation: the buoyancy element, vertical guidance post, and structural sub-frame, and discusses their functionality. The natural world provides solutions to tackling environmental issues such as flooding. When systematically studied and transferred, nature can inspire innovative ideas for functional and sustainable designs for the built environments. Although there are many existing designs and a small number of constructed amphibious buildings, there are very few studies that discuss how the designs are derived, and even fewer on a framework emulating natural systems for transfer into amphibious building design. In that context, this research uses the biomimetic transfer process to abstract relevant biological systems, illustrating their potential for transfer into amphibious foundation design. The aim is to understand how these biological systems passively and continuously respond and adapt to their environment. Organisms such as the Venus flower basket, giant kelp, and red mangrove, among others, are discussed, to understand how they perform the identified functions. The steps of the biomimetic transfer process are used to integrate functions of amphibious buildings and processes of the studied biological systems. The final output of this paper is a discussion of the ways in which these derived relationships can be adopted in amphibious building design.

Suggested Citation

  • Hope Ameh & Lidia Badarnah & Jessica Lamond, 2024. "Amphibious Architecture: A Biomimetic Design Approach to Flood Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1069-:d:1326957
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1069/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1069/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nofal, Omar M. & van de Lindt, John W. & Do, Trung Q., 2020. "Multi-variate and single-variable flood fragility and loss approaches for buildings," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Giacomo Falcucci & Giorgio Amati & Pierluigi Fanelli & Vesselin K. Krastev & Giovanni Polverino & Maurizio Porfiri & Sauro Succi, 2021. "Extreme flow simulations reveal skeletal adaptations of deep-sea sponges," Nature, Nature, vol. 595(7868), pages 537-541, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Djukic, Tijana & Topalovic, Marko & Filipovic, Nenad, 2023. "Validation of lattice Boltzmann based software for blood flow simulations in complex patient-specific arteries against traditional CFD methods," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 957-976.
    2. Chen, Yingzhen & Zhao, Qiuhong & Huang, Kai & Xi, Xunzhuo, 2022. "A Bi-objective optimization model for contract design of humanitarian relief goods procurement considering extreme disasters," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Argyroudis, Sotirios A. & Mitoulis, Stergios Aristoteles, 2021. "Vulnerability of bridges to individual and multiple hazards- floods and earthquakes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    4. Cavalieri, Francesco & Franchin, Paolo & Giovinazzi, Sonia, 2023. "Multi-hazard assessment of increased flooding hazard due to earthquake-induced damage to the natural drainage system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. Rongen, G. & Morales-Nápoles, O. & Kok, M., 2022. "Expert judgment-based reliability analysis of the Dutch flood defense system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    6. Oluwatofunmi Deborah Aribisala & Sang-Guk Yum & Manik Das Adhikari & Moon-Soo Song, 2022. "Flood Damage Assessment: A Review of Microscale Methodologies for Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Margherita Righini & Ignacio Gatti & Andrea Taramelli & Marcello Arosio & Emiliana Valentini & Serena Sapio & Emma Schiavon, 2024. "Integrated Flood Impact and Vulnerability Assessment Using a Multi-Sensor Earth Observation Mission with the Perspective of an Operational Service in Lombardy, Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Wang, Jian & Gao, Shibin & Yu, Long & Zhang, Dongkai & Xie, Chenlin & Chen, Ke & Kou, Lei, 2023. "Data-driven lightning-related failure risk prediction of overhead contact lines based on Bayesian network with spatiotemporal fragility model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    9. Engelmann, L. & Welch, C. & Schmidt, M. & Meller, D. & Wollny, P. & Böhm, B. & Dreizler, A. & Kempf, A., 2023. "A temporal fluid-parcel backwards-tracing method for Direct-Numerical and Large-Eddy Simulation employing Lagrangian particles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    10. Gangwal, Utkarsh & Dong, Shangjia, 2022. "Critical facility accessibility rapid failure early-warning detection and redundancy mapping in urban flooding," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    11. Junqi Li & Haohan Zhang & Xiaoran Zhang & Wenliang Wang, 2023. "Establishment and Application of a Specialized Physical Examination Indicator System for Urban Waterlogging Risk in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Hu, Xiaoyi & Tan, Xinru & Shi, Xiaomin & Liu, Wenjun & Ouyang, Tiancheng, 2023. "An integrated assessment of microfluidic microbial fuel cell subjected to vibration excitation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    13. Zheng, Xiao-Wei & Li, Hong-Nan & Gardoni, Paolo, 2023. "Hybrid Bayesian-Copula-based risk assessment for tall buildings subject to wind loads considering various uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    14. Fahad, Md Golam Rabbani & Nazari, Rouzbeh & Motamedi, M.H. & Karimi, Maryam, 2022. "A Decision-Making Framework Integrating Fluid and Solid Systems to Assess Resilience of Coastal Communities Experiencing Extreme Storm Events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    15. Giorgio Amati & Sauro Succi & Giacomo Falcucci, 2023. "Enhancing the Power Performance of Latent Heat Thermal Energy Storage Systems: The Adoption of Passive, Fractal Supports," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-10, September.
    16. Wu, Jingyi & Yu, Yang & Cheng, Siyuan & Li, Zhenmian & Yu, Jianxing, 2022. "Probabilistic multilevel robustness assessment framework for a TLP under mooring failure considering uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1069-:d:1326957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.