IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11182-d1548199.html

Assessing Public Transport Quality Using AHP and SUTI Indicator 4: A Case Study of the Sustainable Mobility Plan in Wrocław, Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Izabela Dziaduch

    (Department of Logistics, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Piotr Peternek

    (Department of Econometrics and Operational Research, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

Wrocław is the most congestion-challenged city in Poland. Improving the appeal of public transport over private car use could be an effective remedy for the city’s notorious congestion problems. This article evaluates public transport service quality in Wrocław from the passengers’ perspective. The quality assessment focused on two key areas: the quality of service that passengers expect (preference evaluation) and the quality they perceive are delivered by the transport organiser and operator (satisfaction evaluation). Both passenger preferences and satisfaction were assessed based on 14 selected transport service attributes, referred to as quality attributes. To carry out this analysis, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and the SUTI Indicator 4 (Public Transport Quality and Reliability), which is part of the Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI), were employed. Data were collected via a survey questionnaire with a sample of 500 bus and tram users in the city. Statistical analysis of the data were performed using functions and commands available in Microsoft Excel. The resulting SUTI Indicator 4 values (42.6% for bus services and 45.9% for tram services) suggest that Wrocław residents are moderately satisfied with the current public transport system. The study reveals that the transport organiser and operator should prioritise attributes related to travel time, as their fulfilment levels are shown to be either low or moderate. Therefore, in order to encourage more car users to switch to public transport in Wrocław, emphasis should be placed on solutions that ensure punctual departures and provide passengers with greater confidence in reaching their destinations on time.

Suggested Citation

  • Izabela Dziaduch & Piotr Peternek, 2024. "Assessing Public Transport Quality Using AHP and SUTI Indicator 4: A Case Study of the Sustainable Mobility Plan in Wrocław, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11182-:d:1548199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11182/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11182/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johanna Camargo Pérez & Martha Carrillo & Jairo Montoya-Torres, 2015. "Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: a literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 69-87, March.
    2. Ernest H. Forman & Saul I. Gass, 2001. "The Analytic Hierarchy Process---An Exposition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 469-486, August.
    3. Saaty, Thomas L. & Shang, Jen S., 2007. "Group decision-making: Head-count versus intensity of preference," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 22-37, March.
    4. Muthupandian, K S & Vijayakumar, Dr. C, 2012. "Measurement of passengers service quality in public transportation: servqual analysis," MPRA Paper 38584, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Robert Cervero & Hiroaki Suzuki & Kanako Iuchi, 2013. "Transforming Cities with Transit : Transit and Land-Use Integration for Sustainable Urban Development [Transformando las ciudades con el transporte público : integración del transporte público y el uso del suelo para un desarrollo urbano sostenibl," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 12233, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrii Shekhovtsov & Volodymyr Kozlov & Viktor Nosov & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Wojciech Sałabun & Krzysztof Palczewski & Jarosław Wątróbski, 2019. "Multicriteria Approach to Sustainable Transport Evaluation under Incomplete Knowledge: Electric Bikes Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Huadong Chen & Kai Zhao & Zhan Zhang & Haodong Zhang & Linjun Lu, 2024. "Methods for the Performance Evaluation and Design Optimization of Metro Transit-Oriented Development Sites Based on Urban Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Jung Hyun Woo, 2021. "Classification of TOD Typologies Based on Pedestrian Behavior for Sustainable and Active Urban Growth in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Raffaello Furlan & Asmaa AL-Mohannadi, 2020. "An Urban Regeneration Planning Scheme for the Souq Waqif Heritage Site of Doha," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Ahmad Adeel & Bruno Notteboom & Ansar Yasar & Kris Scheerlinck & Jeroen Stevens, 2021. "Insights into the Impacts of Mega Transport Infrastructures on the Transformation of Urban Fabric: Case of BRT Lahore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-32, July.
    7. Mouton, Morgan & Deraëve, Sophie & Guelton, Sonia & Poinsot, Philippe, 2023. "Negotiated windfalls: Mapping how public actors pursue and share land-value capture in Nanterre-la-Folie, France," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. Yung-Tsan Jou & Charmine Sheena Saflor & Klint Allen Mariñas & Michael Nayat Young, 2023. "Determining Factors Affecting Perceived Customer Satisfaction on Public Utility Bus System in Occidental Mindoro, Philippines: A Case Study on Service Quality Assessment during Major Disruptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    10. Liu, Yudi & Zeng, Erli & Luo, Lichen & Sho, Kojiro, 2025. "Transit-induced restructuring: On the mobility inequalities in Tokyo," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    11. Ahmad Adeel & Bruno Notteboom & Ansar Yasar & Kris Scheerlinck & Jeroen Stevens, 2021. "Sustainable Streetscape and Built Environment Designs around BRT Stations: A Stated Choice Experiment Using 3D Visualizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Thi Mai Chi Nguyen & Hironori Kato & Le Binh Phan, 2020. "Is Built Environment Associated with Travel Mode Choice in Developing Cities? Evidence from Hanoi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Ibraeva, Anna & Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & Silva, Cecília & Antunes, António Pais, 2020. "Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 110-130.
    14. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    15. Sandra E. Strasser & Ceyhun Ozgur & David L. Schroeder, 2002. "Selecting a Business College Major: An Analysis of Criteria and Choice Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 17(2), pages 47-56.
    16. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    17. Badland, Hannah & Pearce, Jamie, 2019. "Liveable for whom? Prospects of urban liveability to address health inequities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 94-105.
    18. Abdi, Mohammad Hamed, 2021. "What the newcomers to transit-oriented development are confronted with? Evidence from Iranian policy and planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. Pei Li, 2016. "The New Product Online Evaluation by Expert Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(8), pages 265-265, August.
    20. Turbay, André L. B. & Pereira, Rafael H. M. & Firmino, Rodrigo, 2022. "The equity implications of TOD in Curitiba," SocArXiv cj87q, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11182-:d:1548199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.