IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11004-d1544264.html

The Hierarchy of Factors Important for Work Engagement in Different Types of Remote Working

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Tarnowska

    (Institute of Food Sciences, The Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Justyna Pawlak

    (Management Institute, Krakow University of Economics, 31-510 Krakow, Poland)

  • Marta Moczulska

    (Institute of Management and Quality Sciences, University of Zielona Gora, 65-246 Zielona Gora, Poland)

  • Renata Winkler

    (Management Institute, Krakow University of Economics, 31-510 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

The growing popularity of remote and hybrid work has changed the dynamics of how teams function and accomplish work tasks, creating opportunities to align work practices with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Remote work not only promotes labor market inclusion by eliminating barriers such as those of transportation but also reduces the carbon footprint associated with daily commuting. However, despite the advantages of remote work, researchers and practitioners point to the problem of unstable engagement among remote workers. This study examines the key factors influencing work engagement in remote and hybrid work models, looking at how these factors vary depending on the degree of remote work and the nature of the work. Based on a systematic review, 14 critical factors influencing engagement were identified, followed by the development of a questionnaire and the analysis of responses from 181 employees representing various remote work models. The results obtained in the survey indicate the universal importance that work–life balance, open access to organizational knowledge, and a personalized work environment have for building work engagement. At the same time, the extent of remote work, the form of employment, and team integration methods influence the importance of other factors, revealing differences between fully remote and hybrid employees. The findings underline that building effective strategies to foster engagement should be based on adapting the actions taken to specific work conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Tarnowska & Justyna Pawlak & Marta Moczulska & Renata Winkler, 2024. "The Hierarchy of Factors Important for Work Engagement in Different Types of Remote Working," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11004-:d:1544264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11004/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11004/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabian Onyekachi Ugwu & Ibeawuchi K. Enwereuzor & Jens Mazei, 2023. "Is Working from Home a Blessing or a Burden? Home Demands as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Work Engagement and Work-Life Balance," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(1), pages 341-364, February.
    2. Gerards, Ruud & de Grip, Andries & Weustink, A., 2018. "Do new ways of working increase informal learning?," ROA Research Memorandum 001, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    3. Tino Lesener & Leonard Santiago Pleiss & Burkhard Gusy & Christine Wolter, 2020. "The Study Demands-Resources Framework: An Empirical Introduction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Sheikh Muhamad Hizam & Habiba Akter & Ilham Sentosa & Waqas Ahmed & Mohamad Noorman Masrek & Jawad Ali, 2023. "Predicting Workforce Engagement towards Digital Transformation through a Multi-Analytical Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Sandoval-Reyes & Sandra Idrovo-Carlier & Edison Jair Duque-Oliva, 2021. "Remote Work, Work Stress, and Work–Life during Pandemic Times: A Latin America Situation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-12, July.
    2. David Giauque & Frédéric Cornu & Karine Renard & Yves Emery, 2023. "Opportunity to Use New Ways of Working: Do Sectors and Organizational Characteristics Shape Employee Perceptions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Gerards, Ruud & de Grip, Andries & Weustink, A., 2018. "Do new ways of working increase informal learning?," Research Memorandum 010, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    4. Yasuhiro Kotera & Katia Correa Vione, 2020. "Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Imen Krifa & Llewellyn Ellardus van Zyl & Amel Braham & Selma Ben Nasr & Rebecca Shankland, 2022. "Mental Health during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Optimism and Emotional Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, January.
    6. M. Ángeles López-Cabarcos & Analía López-Carballeira & Carlos Ferro-Soto, 2020. "New Ways of Working and Public Healthcare Professionals’ Well-Being: The Response to Face the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-9, September.
    7. Alexandra Rese & Lars Görmar & Alena Herbig, 2022. "Social networks in coworking spaces and individual coworker’s creativity," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 391-428, February.
    8. Phuong Ngoc-Duy Nguyen & Trang Thi Giang & Hiep Cong Duong & Huan Hong Nguyen, 2025. "Empowering Workplaces: How New Ways of Working Foster Organizational Citizenship Behaviors?," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    9. Silvia Bacci & Bruno Bertaccini & Simone Del Sarto & Leonardo Grilli & Carla Rampichini, 2023. "Statistical methods to estimate the impact of remote teaching on university students’ performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 5513-5531, December.
    10. Prodanova, Jana & Kocarev, Ljupco, 2021. "Is job performance conditioned by work-from-home demands and resources?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    11. Vivek Vohra & Shiwangi Singh & Tanusree Dutta, 2024. "Embracing Flexibility Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Flexible Working Arrangements Using the SCM-TBFO Framework," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(1), pages 1-26, March.
    12. Huan Hong Nguyen & Cong Hiep Duong & Thi Trang Giang & Phuong Ngoc-Duy Nguyen, 2025. "From Being Served to Serving: How Servant Leadership Fosters Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the Digital Era," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    13. Sara De Bruyn & Nina Van Eekert, 2023. "Understanding the Academic and Social Integration Process of Students Entering Higher Education: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    14. Luu, Trong Tuan & Rowley, Chris & Vo, Thanh Thao, 2019. "Addressing employee diversity to foster their work engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 303-315.
    15. Johanna Marie Schmickler & Simon Blaschke & Rebecca Robbins & Filip Mess, 2023. "Determinants of Sleep Quality: A Cross-Sectional Study in University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Grégory Jemine & François Pichault & Christophe Dubois, 2021. "New Ways of Working in academia: maneuvering in and with ambiguity in workspace design processes," Post-Print hal-03419339, HAL.
    17. Jean-François Stich & Antonio Díaz Andrade & Wendelin M Kuepers, 2025. "Combining work and vacation: workation as an attractive work arrangement," Post-Print hal-05333616, HAL.
    18. Karine Renard & Frederic Cornu & Yves Emery & David Giauque, 2021. "The Impact of New Ways of Working on Organizations and Employees: A Systematic Review of Literature," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Anna Kurowska & Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska & Tsegachew Degu Kasegn & Bartłomiej Rokicki, 2025. "Life and Work-life Balance Satisfaction Among Parents Working From Home: the Role of Work-time and Childcare Demands," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 20(3), pages 1315-1338, June.
    20. Annick Parent-Lamarche, 2022. "Teleworking, Work Engagement, and Intention to Quit during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Same Storm, Different Boats?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-19, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11004-:d:1544264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.