IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p9023-d1501541.html

A Study on Revenue Distribution of Chinese Agricultural E-Commerce Supply Chain Based on the Modified Shapley Value Method

Author

Listed:
  • Xiangyang Zhou

    (Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Liang Chi

    (Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jiaxuan Li

    (Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Liwei Xing

    (Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Lu Yang

    (Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Jianzhai Wu

    (Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Han Meng

    (Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of e-commerce in China, “live broadcast + e-commerce” has become an emerging mode of the e-commerce industry. The speedy growth of the digital economy has also provided a favorable external environment for fresh agricultural products to ride on the e-commerce express train. As a result, more and more suppliers of fresh agricultural products choose to sell their products on e-commerce platforms and conduct live streaming. This paper utilizes the e-commerce supply chain field survey data, takes tomato as the specific analyzed variety, and studies the revenue distribution pattern of each subject in the supply chain. The purpose of this paper is to explore the optimization strategy of the revenue distribution of an agricultural e-commerce supply chain, and the results show that the agricultural e-commerce supply chain effectively promotes the matching of supply and demand of medium- and high-end agricultural products, realizes the quality premium of medium- and high-end agricultural products, and significantly improves the overall revenue level of the supply chain. The field survey found that under the supply chain model of “farmers + cooperatives + e-commerce platform”, farmers, cooperatives, and e-commerce platforms gained $2865, $3098, and $1111, respectively, for operating one mu of tomatoes in a year. According to the traditional Shapley value method, from the point of view of the contribution to the cooperative income, part of the income of the farmers and cooperatives should be compensated to the e-commerce platform, and the specific results are as follows: the income of the farmers should be reduced from $2865 to $2729, the income of the cooperatives should be reduced from $3099 to $2955, and the income of the e-commerce platform should be increased from $1111 to $1390. According to the Shapley value method based on the risk coefficient correction, from the perspective of risk compensation, part of the earnings of the e-commerce platform should be compensated to farmers and cooperatives, so as to establish a more equitable and reasonable pattern of earnings distribution, with the specific results: the earnings of farmers should be increased to $3205, the earnings of cooperatives should be increased to $3148, and the earnings of the e-commerce platform should be reduced to $722.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiangyang Zhou & Liang Chi & Jiaxuan Li & Liwei Xing & Lu Yang & Jianzhai Wu & Han Meng, 2024. "A Study on Revenue Distribution of Chinese Agricultural E-Commerce Supply Chain Based on the Modified Shapley Value Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:9023-:d:1501541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/9023/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/9023/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaoguang Zhong & Fangfang Guo & Zhiqiang Wang & Huajun Tang, 2019. "Coordination Analysis of Revenue Sharing in E-Commerce Logistics Service Supply Chain With Cooperative Distribution," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, August.
    2. Godfrid Erasme Ibikoule & Jaehyeon Lee & Barnabé Agalati & Raulston Gillette, 2023. "Development and Effectiveness of Agricultural Cooperatives: Case of Maize Producer Cooperatives (MPCs) in the Republic of Benin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Qing Yang & Lei Xiong & Yanfeng Li & Qian Chen & Yijing Yu & Jingyang Wang, 2022. "Contract Coordination of Fresh Agri-Product Supply Chain under O2O Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Min Li & Lina He & Guangchuan Yang & Zhen Lian, 2022. "Profit-Sharing Contracts for Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chain Considering Spatio-Temporal Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Zi-Yu Liu & Peng-Tao Guo & Daqing Gong, 2021. "Supply Chain Decision Model Based on Blockchain: A Case Study of Fresh Food E-Commerce Supply Chain Performance Improvement," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-14, July.
    6. Yunzeng Wang & Li Jiang & Zuo-Jun Shen, 2004. "Channel Performance Under Consignment Contract with Revenue Sharing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 34-47, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Qu & Hanxi Zheng & Yueting Liu, 2025. "Value Network Co-Creation Mechanism of a High-Tech Park from the Perspective of Knowledge Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-33, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanwei Chen & Xiaojun Liu & Kaiqing Huang & Huajun Tang, 2022. "Pricing and Service Effort Decisions of Book Dual-Channel Supply Chains with Showrooming Effect Based on Cost-Sharing Contracts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Winda Narulidea & Ahmad Rusdiansyah & Sri Gunani Partiwi, 2024. "Fresh product supply chain coordination using vendor managed inventory and consignment with revenue sharing over a finite planning horizon," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(5), pages 406-422, October.
    3. Pyung-Hoi Koo, 2022. "A Capacity Cost-Sharing Contract for a Two-Stage Supply Chain with a Risk-Averse Supplier under a Bargaining Power," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Mandal, Prasenjit & Basu, Preetam & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Rath, Sambit Brata, 2024. "Platform financing vs. bank financing: Strategic choice of financing mode under seller competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 130-146.
    5. Hu, Jing & Hu, Qiying & Xia, Yusen, 2019. "Who should invest in cost reduction in supply chains?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 1-18.
    6. Milena Bieniek & Tomasz Szapiro, 2024. "Supply chain coordination and decision-making under revenue sharing and cost-revenue sharing contracts with returns," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 34(3), pages 15-39.
    7. à lvarez-Albelo, Carmen D. & Hernández-Martín, Raúl & Padrón-Fumero, Noemi, 2020. "The effects on tourism of airfare subsidies for residents: The key role of packaging strategies," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Fang, Xiang & Gavirneni, Srinagesh & Rao, Vithala R., 2013. "Supply chains in the presence of store brands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 392-403.
    9. Xing, Wei & Liu, Liming & Wang, Shouyang, 2014. "More than a second channel? Supply chain strategies in B2B spot markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 699-710.
    10. Zhisong Chen & Li Fang & Shong-Iee Ivan Su, 2021. "The value of offline channel subsidy in bricks and clicks: an O2O supply chain coordination perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 599-643, June.
    11. Cong Wang & Zongbao Zou & Shidao Geng, 2021. "Green Technology Investment in a Decentralized Supply Chain under Demand Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Zhang, Dengfeng & de Matta, Renato & Lowe, Timothy J., 2010. "Channel coordination in a consignment contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 897-905, December.
    13. Yun Fong Lim & Yunzeng Wang & Yue Wu, 2015. "Consignment Contracts with Revenue Sharing for a Capacitated Retailer and Multiple Manufacturers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 527-537, October.
    14. Zhang, Xinmou & Perera, Sandun C. & Wang, Jian-Jun & Cai, Tao & Gupta, Varun, 2025. "Coordinating telehealth platform with revenue-sharing contracts under different reimbursement mechanisms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    15. Hu, Benyong & Xu, Dong & Meng, Chao, 2017. "Inconsistency of a retailer's optimal policies and channel performance under revenue sharing contracts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 53-65.
    16. Cao, Erbao & Wan, Can & Lai, Mingyong, 2013. "Coordination of a supply chain with one manufacturer and multiple competing retailers under simultaneous demand and cost disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 425-433.
    17. Sarker, Bhaba R., 2014. "Consignment stocking policy models for supply chain systems: A critical review and comparative perspectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 52-67.
    18. Yigal Gerchak & Eugene Khmelnitsky & Lawrence W. Robinson, 2007. "Untruthful probabilistic demand forecasts in vendor‐managed revenue‐sharing contracts: Coordinating the chain," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(7), pages 742-749, October.
    19. Yifeng Liu & Heling Mao & Qingjun Zhang, 2023. "Pricing and Profit Distribution in Supply Chain Through Option Contracts," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, January.
    20. Pietro Giovanni, 2017. "Closed-loop supply chain coordination through incentives with asymmetric information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 133-167, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:9023-:d:1501541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.