IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8373-d1486352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extraction of Maize Distribution Information Based on Critical Fertility Periods and Active–Passive Remote Sensing

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoran Lv

    (Key Laboratory of Spatio-Temporal Information and Ecological Restoration of Mines of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Xiangjun Zhang

    (Henan Remote Sensing and Mapping Institute, Zhengzhou 450003, China)

  • Haikun Yu

    (Henan Remote Sensing and Mapping Institute, Zhengzhou 450003, China)

  • Xiaoping Lu

    (Key Laboratory of Spatio-Temporal Information and Ecological Restoration of Mines of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Junli Zhou

    (Henan Remote Sensing and Mapping Institute, Zhengzhou 450003, China)

  • Junbiao Feng

    (Key Laboratory of Spatio-Temporal Information and Ecological Restoration of Mines of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Hang Su

    (Henan Remote Sensing and Mapping Institute, Zhengzhou 450003, China)

Abstract

This study proposes a new method for integrating active and passive remote sensing data during critical reproductive periods in order to extract maize areas early and to address the problem of low accuracy in the classification of maize-growing areas affected by climate change. Focusing on Jiaozuo City, this study utilized active–passive remote sensing images to determine the optimal time for maize identification. The relative importance of features was assessed using a feature selection method combined with a machine learning algorithm, the impact of both single-source and multi-source features on accuracy was analyzed to generate the optimal feature subset, and the classification accuracies of different machine learning classification methods for maize at the tasseling stage were compared. Ultimately, this study identified the most effective remote sensing features and methods for maize detection during the optimal fertility period. The experimental results show that the feature set optimized for the tasseling stage significantly enhanced maize recognition accuracy. Specifically, the random forest (RF) method, when applied to the multi-source data fusion feature set, yielded the highest accuracy, improving classification accuracy by 24.6% and 4.86% over single-source features, and achieving an overall accuracy of 93.38% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.91. Data on the study area’s maize area were also extracted for the years 2018–2022, with accuracy values of 93.83%, 98.77%, 97%, and 98.05%, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoran Lv & Xiangjun Zhang & Haikun Yu & Xiaoping Lu & Junli Zhou & Junbiao Feng & Hang Su, 2024. "Extraction of Maize Distribution Information Based on Critical Fertility Periods and Active–Passive Remote Sensing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8373-:d:1486352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8373/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8373/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincenzi, Simone & Zucchetta, Matteo & Franzoi, Piero & Pellizzato, Michele & Pranovi, Fabio & De Leo, Giulio A. & Torricelli, Patrizia, 2011. "Application of a Random Forest algorithm to predict spatial distribution of the potential yield of Ruditapes philippinarum in the Venice lagoon, Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1471-1478.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luying Liu & Jingyi Yang & Fang Yin & Linsen He, 2025. "High-Resolution Mapping of Maize in Mountainous Terrain Using Machine Learning and Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wiltshire, Kathryn H & Tanner, Jason E, 2020. "Comparing maximum entropy modelling methods to inform aquaculture site selection for novel seaweed species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 429(C).
    2. Dandan Zhao & Hong S. He & Wen J. Wang & Lei Wang & Haibo Du & Kai Liu & Shengwei Zong, 2018. "Predicting Wetland Distribution Changes under Climate Change and Human Activities in a Mid- and High-Latitude Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Jig Han Jeong & Jonathan P Resop & Nathaniel D Mueller & David H Fleisher & Kyungdahm Yun & Ethan E Butler & Dennis J Timlin & Kyo-Moon Shim & James S Gerber & Vangimalla R Reddy & Soo-Hyung Kim, 2016. "Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    4. So Young Woo & Chung Gil Jung & Ji Wan Lee & Seong Joon Kim, 2019. "Evaluation of Watershed Scale Aquatic Ecosystem Health by SWAT Modeling and Random Forest Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    5. V. Kohestani & M. Hassanlourad & A. Ardakani, 2015. "Evaluation of liquefaction potential based on CPT data using random forest," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(2), pages 1079-1089, November.
    6. das Neves, Patricia Bittencourt Tavares & Blanco, Claudio José Cavalcante & Montenegro Duarte, André Augusto Azevedo & das Neves, Filipe Bittencourt Souza & das Neves, Isabela Bittencourt Souza & de P, 2021. "Amazon rainforest deforestation influenced by clandestine and regular roadway network," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Grimmett, Liam & Whitsed, Rachel & Horta, Ana, 2020. "Presence-only species distribution models are sensitive to sample prevalence: Evaluating models using spatial prediction stability and accuracy metrics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    8. Netrananda Sahu & Pritiranjan Das & Atul Saini & Ayush Varun & Suraj Kumar Mallick & Rajiv Nayan & S. P. Aggarwal & Balaram Pani & Ravi Kesharwani & Anil Kumar, 2023. "Analysis of Tea Plantation Suitability Using Geostatistical and Machine Learning Techniques: A Case of Darjeeling Himalaya, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Wenjie Luan & Xiaojing Shen & Yinghao Fu & Wangcheng Li & Qiaoling Liu & Tuo Wang & Dongxiang Ma, 2023. "Research on Maize Acreage Extraction and Growth Monitoring Based on a Machine Learning Algorithm and Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Kosicki, Jakub Z., 2017. "Should topographic metrics be considered when predicting species density of birds on a large geographical scale? A case of Random Forest approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 349(C), pages 76-85.
    11. Dandan Zhao & Hong S. He & Wen J. Wang & Jiping Liu & Haibo Du & Miaomiao Wu & Xinyuan Tan, 2018. "Distribution and Driving Factors of Forest Swamp Conversions in a Cold Temperate Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, September.
    12. Gao, Zitian & Guo, Danlu & Ryu, Dongryeol & Western, Andrew W., 2025. "Benchmarking farm-level cotton water productivity using on-farm irrigation measurements and remotely sensed yields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    13. Ewa Wilk & Małgorzata Krówczyńska & Bogdan Zagajewski, 2019. "Modelling the Spatial Distribution of Asbestos—Cement Products in Poland with the Use of the Random Forest Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-13, August.
    14. Fukuda, Shinji & Spreer, Wolfram & Yasunaga, Eriko & Yuge, Kozue & Sardsud, Vicha & Müller, Joachim, 2013. "Random Forests modelling for the estimation of mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Chok Anan) fruit yields under different irrigation regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 142-150.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8373-:d:1486352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.