IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6532-d1446466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Management of Protected Areas in Galapagos: 60 Years after Its Declaration as a National Park

Author

Listed:
  • María Maestro

    (Faculty of Ocean and Environmental Sciences, University of Cadiz, Avda. República Saharaui s/n, 11510 Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain)

  • María Luisa Pérez-Cayeiro

    (Institute of Marine Research (INMAR), University of Cadiz, Avda. República Saharaui s/n, 11510 Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain)

  • Harry Reyes

    (Galápagos National Park Directorate, Av. Charles Darwin s/n, Puerto Ayora, Santa Cruz, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador)

  • Juan Adolfo Chica-Ruiz

    (Institute of Marine Research (INMAR), University of Cadiz, Avda. República Saharaui s/n, 11510 Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain)

Abstract

The Galapagos Islands are one of the most emblematic protected areas on the planet and also one of the most studied. Their main economic activity is tourism, which has grown rapidly in recent years. The increase in tourists is associated with the increase in population and the introduction of invasive species, which puts conservation at risk. This makes adequate management even more necessary and relevant on an international scale since the economy of Galapagos depends on the good state of conservation of its ecosystems and species. Numerous studies have shown that social factors, rather than physical–natural ones, determine the success or failure of a marine protected area (MPA), so they must be urgently incorporated into all phases of MPA management. In this study, we analyzed the management of the protected areas of Galapagos, including the National Park and the Marine Reserve, with the purpose of highlighting their weaknesses and strengths. The methodology used presents five prescribed scenarios in which priority is given to one or other factors, each of which has an impact on the biophysical and socio-economic systems that are influenced by the MPA. These scenarios were called proactive, interactive, centralized, learning, and formal management. Data were obtained through a comprehensive literature review and primary data collection methods, including in-depth interviews with key stakeholders and DPNG managers, as well as direct observations. Interviewees covered the main relevant sectors in the archipelago (fishing, tourism, and conservation). The results show that the archipelago’s protected areas follow a proactive management model with a continuous feedback loop. This feedback is a key element in any adaptive management process, which also allows practitioners to anticipate future problems. Both public participation and strategic planning are essential.

Suggested Citation

  • María Maestro & María Luisa Pérez-Cayeiro & Harry Reyes & Juan Adolfo Chica-Ruiz, 2024. "Analysis of the Management of Protected Areas in Galapagos: 60 Years after Its Declaration as a National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6532-:d:1446466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6532/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6532/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hind, E.J. & Hiponia, M.C. & Gray, T.S., 2010. "From community-based to centralised national management--A wrong turning for the governance of the marine protected area in Apo Island, Philippines?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 54-62, January.
    2. Terry P. Hughes & James T. Kerry & Mariana Álvarez-Noriega & Jorge G. Álvarez-Romero & Kristen D. Anderson & Andrew H. Baird & Russell C. Babcock & Maria Beger & David R. Bellwood & Ray Berkelmans & T, 2017. "Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals," Nature, Nature, vol. 543(7645), pages 373-377, March.
    3. Abecasis, Rita Costa & Longnecker, Nancy & Schmidt, Luisa & Clifton, Julian, 2013. "Marine conservation in remote small island settings: Factors influencing marine protected area establishment in the Azores," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-9.
    4. Castrejón, Mauricio & Charles, Anthony, 2013. "Improving fisheries co-management through ecosystem-based spatial management: The Galapagos Marine Reserve," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 235-245.
    5. Viteri Mejía, César & Brandt, Sylvia, 2015. "Managing tourism in the Galapagos Islands through price incentives: A choice experiment approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Daniela Marzo & Iacopo Cavallini & Luisa Scaccia & Paolo Guidetti & Antonio Di Franco & Antonio Calò & Federico Niccolini, 2023. "Drivers of Small-Scale Fishers’ Acceptability across Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas at Different Stages of Establishment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Liliana A. Alencastro & Mauricio Carvache-Franco & Wilmer Carvache-Franco, 2023. "Preferences of Experiential Fishing Tourism in a Marine Protected Area: A Study in the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Serena Muccitelli & Carolina Pozzi & Romina D’Ascanio & Stefano Magaudda, 2023. "Environmental Contract: A Collaborative Tool to Improve the Multilevel Governance of European MPAs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han-Shen Chen & Chu-Wei Chen, 2019. "Economic Valuation of Green Island, Taiwan: A Choice Experiment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Özkan, Oktay & Destek, Mehmet Akif & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Esmaeili, Parisa, 2024. "Unlocking the impact of international financial support to infrastructure, energy efficiency, and ICT on CO2 emissions in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    3. Guy Jackson, 2023. "Environmental subjectivities and experiences of climate extreme-driven loss and damage in northern Australia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(7), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Chi Chiu Cheang & Yue Ma & Lincoln Fok, 2018. "Occurrence and Composition of Microplastics in the Seabed Sediments of the Coral Communities in Proximity of a Metropolitan Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Ignacio J. Melero-Jiménez & Yael Sorokin & Ami Merlin & Jiawei Li & Alejandro Couce & Jonathan Friedman, 2025. "Mutualism breakdown underpins evolutionary rescue in an obligate cross-feeding bacterial consortium," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Nan Hu & Paul E. Bourdeau & Johan Hollander, 2024. "Responses of marine trophic levels to the combined effects of ocean acidification and warming," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Karki, Seema & Webb, J Angus & Stewardson, Michael J. & Fowler, Keirnan & Kattel, Giri Raj, 2023. "Basin-scale riverine ecosystem services vary with network geometry," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Junard P. Duterte, 2024. "Global Trends in Marine Biodiversity: Insights for Conservation and Sustainable Management," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(14), pages 474-480, November.
    9. Halkos, George & Aslanidis, Panagiotis-Stavros, 2025. "The Socio-Cultural and Spiritual Dimensions on Non-marketed Environmental Valuation," MPRA Paper 124961, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Nils Rädecker & Stéphane Escrig & Jorge E. Spangenberg & Christian R. Voolstra & Anders Meibom, 2023. "Coupled carbon and nitrogen cycling regulates the cnidarian–algal symbiosis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. K. M. Quigley & M. J. H. Oppen, 2022. "Predictive models for the selection of thermally tolerant corals based on offspring survival," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Han-Shen Chen, 2019. "Establishment and Application of an Evaluation Model for Orchid Island Sustainable Tourism Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Kubo, Takahiro & Shoji, Yasushi & Tsuge, Takahiro & Kuriyama, Koichi, 2018. "Voluntary Contributions to Hiking Trail Maintenance: Evidence From a Field Experiment in a National Park, Japan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 124-128.
    14. Corentin Hochart & Lucas Paoli & Hans-Joachim Ruscheweyh & Guillem Salazar & Emilie Boissin & Sarah Romac & Julie Poulain & Guillaume Bourdin & Guillaume Iwankow & Clémentine Moulin & Maren Ziegler & , 2023. "Ecology of Endozoicomonadaceae in three coral genera across the Pacific Ocean," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Veronica Relano & Maria Lourdes Deng Palomares & Daniel Pauly, 2021. "Comparing the Performance of Four Very Large Marine Protected Areas with Different Levels of Protection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Onozuka, Mizuki & Osawa, Takeshi, 2022. "Utilization potential of alien plants in nature-based tourism sites: A case study on Agave americana (century plant) in the Ogasawara Islands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    17. Shannon G. Klein & Cassandra Roch & Carlos M. Duarte, 2024. "Systematic review of the uncertainty of coral reef futures under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Kularatne, Thamarasi & Wilson, Clevo & Lee, Boon & Hoang, Viet-Ngu, 2021. "Tourists’ before and after experience valuations: A unique choice experiment with policy implications for the nature-based tourism industry," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 529-543.
    19. Linda A. Selvey & Morris Carpenter & Mattea Lazarou & Katherine Cullerton, 2022. "Communicating about Energy Policy in a Resource-Rich Jurisdiction during the Climate Crisis: Lessons from the People of Brisbane, Queensland, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
    20. Brites, Alice Dantas & Morsello, Carla, 2018. "Effects of Economic Dependence and Cooperative Behavior Over Participation in Monitoring the Impacts of Natural Resource Trade," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 365-372.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6532-:d:1446466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.