IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p3945-d1390607.html

Research on the Activation Path of Employees’ Openness to Digital Transformation: A New Impetus to Realize Enterprises’ Digital Transformation for Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Yanhua Zhou

    (School of Business Administration, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, China)

  • Zilong Li

    (School of Business Administration, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, China)

Abstract

Digital transformation is an important strategic decision for the sustainable development of enterprises, which helps enterprises achieve sustainable performance, sustainable management, and even sustainable business models. While there have been a number of useful studies discussing the impetus of digital transformation, most of them have neglected the role from employees, especially their attitudes and perceptions towards transformation. Focusing on employees’ openness to digital transformation, we selected six antecedents to construct a configuration model, using fsQCA and NCA methods to explore the complex causal relationship between each antecedent and openness to digital transformation. This aims to derive the activation paths for employees’ openness to digital transformation, so as to help the enterprises’ digital transformation and further achieve sustainable development. Through the data analysis of 462 employees of Chinese enterprises, the following conclusions are drawn: firstly, single antecedents are not necessary conditions for high/non-high digital transformation openness activation; secondly, there are three configurations associated with the high openness activation of digital transformation: a comprehensive collaboration type under internal environment dominance (S1a + S1b), the consideration of both an internal and external environment type under mindfulness characteristics’ dominance (S2), and a mindful substitution type under internal environment dominance (S3); and finally, there are four configurations associated with non-high digital transformation openness activation and an asymmetric relationship exists with the high digital transformation openness activation path.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanhua Zhou & Zilong Li, 2024. "Research on the Activation Path of Employees’ Openness to Digital Transformation: A New Impetus to Realize Enterprises’ Digital Transformation for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:3945-:d:1390607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/3945/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/3945/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Horváth, Dóra & Szabó, Roland Zs., 2019. "Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 119-132.
    2. Ryan P. Jacobson & Lisa A. Marchiondo & Kathryn J. L. Jacobson & Jacqueline N. Hood, 2020. "The Synergistic Effect of Descriptive and Injunctive Norm Perceptions on Counterproductive Work Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 191-209, February.
    3. Chien-Chung Huang & Bin Tu & Huiyu Zhang & Jamie Huang, 2022. "Mindfulness Practice and Job Performance in Social Workers: Mediation Effect of Work Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, August.
    4. AlNuaimi, Bader K. & Kumar Singh, Sanjay & Ren, Shuang & Budhwar, Pawan & Vorobyev, Dmitriy, 2022. "Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 636-648.
    5. Verhoef, Peter C. & Broekhuizen, Thijs & Bart, Yakov & Bhattacharya, Abhi & Qi Dong, John & Fabian, Nicolai & Haenlein, Michael, 2021. "Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 889-901.
    6. Qi Song & Xiaohong Chen & Hao Gu, 2023. "How Technological, Organizational, and Environmental Factors Drive Enterprise Digital Innovation: Analysis Based on the Dynamic FsQCA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Ryan P. Jacobson & Lisa A. Marchiondo & Kathryn J. L. Jacobson & Jacqueline N. Hood, 2020. "Correction to: The Synergistic Effect of Descriptive and Injunctive Norm Perceptions on Counterproductive Work Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 211-211, February.
    8. Xiao Deng & Xi Guo & Yenchun Jim Wu & Min Chen, 2021. "Perceived Environmental Dynamism Promotes Entrepreneurial Team Member’s Innovation: Explanations Based on the Uncertainty Reduction Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rehab Rabie & Safaa Shaaban & Israa Iewaaelhamd, 2026. "The impact of AI integration on human capital development in the middle east: leveraging the predictive power of machine learning models and measuring the moderating role of employee openness to change," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zahoor, Nadia & Zopiatis, Anastasios & Adomako, Samuel & Lamprinakos, Grigorios, 2023. "The micro-foundations of digitally transforming SMEs: How digital literacy and technology interact with managerial attributes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Li, Fei & Zhang, Nana, 2025. "Digital transformation, innovation investment and quality," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Junru Chen & Lei Shen, 2024. "A Synthetic Review on Enterprise Digital Transformation: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Xiao, Zhongyi & Li, Yuanling & Xiang, Cheng, 2025. "Do suppliers value customer firms' digital transformation? Evidence from trade credit provision," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Yang, Haiyan & Chen, Linlin & Zhang, Yuyu, 2024. "Political conformity and digital transformation: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1979-1997.
    6. Jinkai Liang & Ke Du & Dandan Chen, 2023. "The Effect of Digitalization on Ambidextrous Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises: A Perspective of Empowering and Enabling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Karola Bastini & Rudolf Kerschreiter & Maik Lachmann & Matthias Ziegler & Tim Sawert, 2024. "Encouraging Individual Contributions to Net-Zero Organizations: Effects of Behavioral Policy Interventions and Social Norms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(3), pages 543-560, July.
    8. Wang, Lu & Chen, Lifeng & Zhong, Shengyang & Zhou, Qunmi, 2025. "How executive green perception affect high-quality growth: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 108(PB).
    9. Yang Yu & Fangrong Ren & Yun Ju & Jingyi Zhang & Xiaoyan Liu, 2024. "Exploring the Role of Digital Transformation and Breakthrough Innovation in Enhanced Performance of Energy Enterprises: Fresh Evidence for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Zhang, Ping & Yang, Huilin & Chen, Chen & Wang, Tao & Jia, Ximeng, 2025. "The impact of population aging on corporate digital transformation: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    11. Fernando Almeida, 2023. "Challenges in the Digital Transformation of Ports," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Pinto, Marcelo Rezende & Salume, Paula Karina & Barbosa, Marcelo Werneck & de Sousa, Paulo Renato, 2023. "The path to digital maturity: A cluster analysis of the retail industry in an emerging economy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Muhammad Bilal & Zhao Xicang & Wu Jiying & Jan Muhammad Sohu & Sadaf Akhtar & Muhammad Iatzaz Ul Hassan, 2025. "Digital Transformation and SME Innovation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mediating and Moderating Effects," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 1153-1182, March.
    14. Zhang, Juan & Miao, Xiaoming & Shang, Tiantian, 2025. "Impact mechanism of digital transformation on supply chain resilience," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    15. Jiabao Lin & Minyi Mao, 2024. "How does digital transformation affect sustainable innovation performance? The pivotal roles of digital technology‐business alignment and environmental uncertainty," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3163-3181, August.
    16. Caiqing Liang & Mohd Rusli Yacob & Siong Hook Law & Irina Harun, 2024. "Effects of Digital Transformation and Green Technology Innovation on Manufacturing’s Financial Performance: Evidence from China," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 28(4), pages 92-119.
    17. Xiao Han & Menghan Zhang & Yixuan Hu & Yuan Huang, 2022. "Study on the Digital Transformation Capability of Cost Consultation Enterprises Based on Maturity Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Dahl, Andrew J. & Peltier, James W. & Swan, Eric L., 2023. "Anticipatory value-in-use in early-stage digital health service transformations: How consumers assess value propositions before and after abrupt, exogenous shocks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Zhu, Xiumei & Li, Yue, 2023. "The use of data-driven insight in ambidextrous digital transformation: How do resource orchestration, organizational strategic decision-making, and organizational agility matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    20. Piyush Ranjan & Preeti Narwal, 2025. "Investigating Organizational Unlearning and Agility in Digital Transformation for improved Innovation Performance in an Emerging Economy: Moderating Roles of Digital Business Intensity and Firm Sizes," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(3), pages 601-623, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:3945-:d:1390607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.