IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7665-d1141050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coherence Analysis of National Maritime Policy of Pakistan across Shipping Sector Governance Framework in the Context of Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Bushra Aslam

    (Department of Environmental Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Kanwar Muhammad Javed Iqbal

    (National Institute of Maritime Affairs, Bahria University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Nadia Akhtar

    (Department of Environmental Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Angela Bahauovna Mottaeva

    (Department of Management and Innovations, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 125167 Moscow, Russia)

  • Turutina Tatyana Fedorovna

    (Department of Engineering Graphics and Computer Modeling, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 129337 Moscow, Russia)

  • Sergey Barykin

    (Graduate School of Service and Trade, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Muhammad Irfan Khan

    (Department of Environmental Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

Abstract

Sustainable maritime development needs coherent governance, particularly for the shipping sector, to ensure a stable maritime economy. However, maritime governance in Pakistan is considered inadequate and incoherent and thus poses a serious challenge to sustainability. The National Maritime Policy (NMP) was launched two decades ago, in 2002, to provide an overarching governance framework for long-term benefits, but it is now outdated. This study aimed at analyzing the extent to which the NMP of 2002 is coherent with provincial, national, and international obligations and addresses emerging requirements for the development of a sustainable shipping sector in Pakistan. An analytical framework based on three (03) guiding principles, seven (07) criteria, and twenty-eight (28) indicators was employed using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. Coherence across twenty-one (21) governing instruments was analyzed, scored (0–5), and rated on a ratio scale to represent the coherence index for each indicator. Thus, a matrix representing the coherence index score for each indicator individually and in pairwise comparison with the NMP was developed. An overall coherence index was calculated as 2.1, which shows poor coherence across governing instruments. This indicates that the NMP 2002 is unable to address emerging governance needs for sustainability issues such as climate response, pollution control, ballast water management, ecosystem conservation, social well-being, stakeholder engagement, and economic diversification, thus requiring revision to meet the challenges created by incoherent governing instruments at all levels and among segments of the maritime economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Bushra Aslam & Kanwar Muhammad Javed Iqbal & Nadia Akhtar & Angela Bahauovna Mottaeva & Turutina Tatyana Fedorovna & Sergey Barykin & Muhammad Irfan Khan, 2023. "Coherence Analysis of National Maritime Policy of Pakistan across Shipping Sector Governance Framework in the Context of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7665-:d:1141050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7665/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7665/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaidi Nõmmela & Kati Kõrbe Kaare, 2022. "Maritime Policy Design Framework with ESG Performance Approach: Case of Estonia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Donalda Karnauskaitė & Gerald Schernewski & Josianne G. Støttrup & Marija Kataržytė, 2019. "Indicator-Based Sustainability Assessment Tool to Support Coastal and Marine Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Pietro Evangelista & Alfonso Morvillo, 1998. "The role of training in developing entrepreneurship: the case of shipping in Italy [1]," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 81-96, January.
    4. World Bank, 2021. "Pakistan Blue Carbon Rapid Assessment," World Bank Publications - Reports 35663, The World Bank Group.
    5. Hualong Yang & Xuefei Ma, 2019. "Uncovering CO 2 Emissions Patterns from China-Oriented International Maritime Transport: Decomposition and Decoupling Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Alexandra Fratila (Adam) & Ioana Andrada Gavril (Moldovan) & Sorin Cristian Nita & Andrei Hrebenciuc, 2021. "The Importance of Maritime Transport for Economic Growth in the European Union: A Panel Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mirza Zeeshan Baig & Khanssa Lagdami & Kanwar Muhammad Javed Iqbal, 2025. "Maritime Governance Analysis for Domestic Ferry Safety and Sustainability by Employing Principles, Criteria and Indicators (PCIs) Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-28, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaidi Nõmmela & Kati Kõrbe Kaare, 2022. "Incorporated Maritime Policy Concept: Adopting ESRS Principles to Support Maritime Sector’s Sustainable Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Zhang, Tong & Burke, Paul J. & Wang, Qi, 2024. "Effectiveness of electric vehicle subsidies in China: A three-dimensional panel study," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Guangying Jin & Wei Feng & Qingpu Meng, 2022. "Prediction of Waterway Cargo Transportation Volume to Support Maritime Transportation Systems Based on GA-BP Neural Network Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, October.
    4. W. Matekenya & R. Ncwadi, 2022. "The impact of maritime transport financing on total trade in South Africa," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Jan Ditzen & Francesco Ravazzolo, 2022. "Dominant Drivers of National Inflation," Working Papers No 08/2022, Centre for Applied Macro- and Petroleum economics (CAMP), BI Norwegian Business School.
    6. Javier Vaca-Cabrero & Javier Domínguez Rastrojo & Nicoletta González-Cancelas & Alberto Camarero-Orive, 2025. "Enhancing Sustainability in Port Infrastructure Through Innovation: A Case Study of the Spanish Port System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Goh, Tian & Zhong, Sheng & Ang, B.W. & Su, Bin & Ng, Szu Hui & Chai, Kah-Hin, 2021. "Driving factors of changes in international maritime energy consumption: Microdata evidence 2014–2017," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Sarwar, Suleman, 2022. "Impact of energy intensity, green economy and blue economy to achieve sustainable economic growth in GCC countries: Does Saudi Vision 2030 matters to GCC countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 30-46.
    9. Su-Han Woo & Hee-Seok Bang & Sally Martin & Kevin X. Li, 2013. "Evolution of research themes in Maritime Policy & Management—1973--2012," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 200-225, May.
    10. Olga Petrychenko & Maksym Levinskyi & Sergey Goolak & Vaidas Lukoševičius, 2025. "Prospects of Solar Energy in the Context of Greening Maritime Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-45, March.
    11. Ming Meng & Shucheng Wu & Jin Zhou & Xinfang Wang, 2019. "What is Currently Driving the Growth of China’s Household Electricity Consumption? A Clustering and Decomposition Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Rida Waheed, 2022. "The Significance of Energy Factors, Green Economic Indicators, Blue Economic Aspects towards Carbon Intensity: A Study of Saudi Vision 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Yuzhe Zhao & Yujun Fan & Jingmiao Zhou & Haibo Kuang, 2019. "Bi-Objective Optimization of Vessel Speed and Route for Sustainable Coastal Shipping under the Regulations of Emission Control Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    14. Sou, Weng Sut & Goh, Tian & Lee, Xin Ni & Ng, Szu Hui & Chai, Kah-Hin, 2022. "Reducing the carbon intensity of international shipping – The impact of energy efficiency measures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    15. Theotokas, Ioannis, 2007. "Chapter 3 On Top of World Shipping: Greek Shipping Companies' Organization and Management," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 63-93, January.
    16. Sipan Li & Qunxi Gong & Shaolei Yang, 2019. "Analysis of the Agricultural Economy and Agricultural Pollution Using the Decoupling Index in Chengdu, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-11, October.
    17. Rida Waheed, 2023. "Energy Challenges, Green Growth, Blue Indicators, and Sustainable Economic Growth: A Study of Saudi Arabia," Evaluation Review, , vol. 47(6), pages 983-1024, December.
    18. Suleman Sarwar & Rida Waheed & Ghazala Aziz & Simona Andreea Apostu, 2022. "The Nexus of Energy, Green Economy, Blue Economy, and Carbon Neutrality Targets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Shuang He & Fuad Mohammed Alhamdi & Ch. Paramaiah & Sobia Hanif & Muhammad Atif Nawaz, 2025. "Role of Blue Economy and Green Economy in Economic Growth: Evidence From Pakistan," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(3), pages 3280-3291, August.
    20. Kong, Dewei & Lin, Zelong & Li, Wei & He, Wei, 2024. "Development of an improved Bayesian network method for maritime accident safety assessment based on multiscale scenario analysis theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7665-:d:1141050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.