IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7525-d1139183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accessibility and Tourist Satisfaction—Influencing Factors for Tourism in Dobrogea, Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Viorica Dumitrașcu

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Camelia Teodorescu

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Alexandra Cioclu

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Dobrogea is a region in Romania that boasts a rich cultural heritage, with a significant number of historical monuments, as well as breathtaking landscapes that attract tourists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of accessibility for seven of the most popular tourist attractions in Dobrogea, which were selected on the basis of their physical, geographic, religious, and historical significance. Furthermore, the level of satisfaction among tourists who visit each attraction was also assessed. Methodologically, several working and data processing methods specific to accessibility analysis were used, and graphic materials were produced to highlight the results obtained. To analyse tourist satisfaction, the researchers conducted interviews with 718 tourists who visited the attractions between June and September of 2022. The findings of this study can provide valuable information to local communities regarding the tourism potential of the region and the accessibility of its attractions. These data can be used to identify areas where roads need to be built or rehabilitated to improve accessibility to important tourist sites. By providing easy access to Dobrogea’s many attractions and ensuring that tourists are satisfied with their experiences, the region can become a top tourist destination in Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Viorica Dumitrașcu & Camelia Teodorescu & Alexandra Cioclu, 2023. "Accessibility and Tourist Satisfaction—Influencing Factors for Tourism in Dobrogea, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7525-:d:1139183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7525/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7525/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Serena Lonardi & Yvonne Unterpertinger, 2022. "The Relevance of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Traditional Languages for the Tourism Experience: The Case of Ladin in South Tyrol," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Daniel Sampaio Tavares & Fernando Brandão Alves & Isabel Breda Vásquez, 2021. "The Relationship between Intangible Cultural Heritage and Urban Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Zhicheng Zheng & Haoming Xia & Shrinidhi Ambinakudige & Yaochen Qin & Yang Li & Zhixiang Xie & Lijun Zhang & Haibin Gu, 2019. "Spatial Accessibility to Hospitals Based on Web Mapping API: An Empirical Study in Kaifeng, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    4. García-Albertos, Pedro & Picornell, Miguel & Salas-Olmedo, María Henar & Gutiérrez, Javier, 2019. "Exploring the potential of mobile phone records and online route planners for dynamic accessibility analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 294-307.
    5. Xia, Nan & Cheng, Liang & Chen, Song & Wei, XiaoYan & Zong, WenWen & Li, ManChun, 2018. "Accessibility based on Gravity-Radiation model and Google Maps API: A case study in Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 178-190.
    6. Anjali R. Virkar & Prita D. Mallya, 2018. "A Review of Dimensions of Tourism Transport Affecting Tourist Satisfaction," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 9(1), pages 72-80, January.
    7. Ileana Pătru-Stupariu & Marioara Pascu & Matthias Bürgi, 2019. "Exploring Tangible and Intangible Heritage and its Resilience as a Basis to Understand the Cultural Landscapes of Saxon Communities in Southern Transylvania (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Chika Udeaja & Claudia Trillo & Kwasi G.B. Awuah & Busisiwe C.N. Makore & D. A. Patel & Lukman E. Mansuri & Kumar N. Jha, 2020. "Urban Heritage Conservation and Rapid Urbanization: Insights from Surat, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, March.
    9. Hiroyuki Kajihara & Su Zhang & Wonhee You & Qingwen Min, 2018. "Concerns and Opportunities around Cultural Heritage in East Asian Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mirela Mazilu & Amalia Niță & Ionuț-Adrian Drăguleasa & Oana Mititelu-Ionuș, 2023. "Fostering Urban Destination Prosperity through Post COVID-19 Sustainable Tourism in Craiova, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Andrei-Florin Băbăț & Mirela Mazilu & Amalia Niță & Ionuț-Adrian Drăguleasa & Mihaela Grigore, 2023. "Tourism and Travel Competitiveness Index: From Theoretical Definition to Practical Analysis in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin Meng & Chuanguang Zhu & Jie Pu & Bo Wen & Wentao Si, 2022. "Study on the Influence Mechanism of Intangible Cultural Heritage Distribution from Man–Land Relationship Perspective: A Case Study in Shandong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Siqi Lai & Brian Deal, 2022. "Parks, Green Space, and Happiness: A Spatially Specific Sentiment Analysis Using Microblogs in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Sławomir Goliszek, 2021. "GIS tools and programming languages for creating models of public and private transport potential accessibility in Szczecin, Poland," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 115-137, January.
    4. Jairo Ortega & János Tóth & Tamás Péter, 2021. "A Comprehensive Model to Study the Dynamic Accessibility of the Park & Ride System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Jiangjun Wan & Yutong Zhao & Kaili Zhang & Chunchi Ma & Haiying Sun & Ziming Wang & Hongyu Wu & Mingjie Li & Lingqing Zhang & Xiaohong Tang & Ying Cao & Li Tang & Jinxiu Yang, 2022. "Healthy Community-Life Circle Planning Combining Objective Measurement and Subjective Evaluation: Theoretical and Empirical Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Yadan Yan & Tianzhao Guo & Dongwei Wang, 2021. "Dynamic Accessibility Analysis of Urban Road-to-Freeway Interchanges Based on Navigation Map Paths," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Fielbaum, Andrés & Jara-Diaz, Sergio, 2021. "Assessment of the socio-spatial effects of urban transport investment using Google Maps API," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Shang, Qingxue & Guo, Xiaodong & Li, Jichao & Wang, Tao, 2022. "Post-earthquake health care service accessibility assessment framework and its application in a medium-sized city," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    9. Sittichok Plaiphum & Roengchai Tansuchat, 2023. "Cultural Capital of Sea Salt Farming in Ban Laem District of Phetchaburi Province as per the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, August.
    10. Marioara Pascu & Ileana Pătru-Stupariu, 2021. "The Assessment of the Authenticity and Conservation Status of Cultural Landscapes in Southern Transylvania (Romania)," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Glykeria Myrovali & Maria Morfoulaki & Thomai Mpaltzi, 2023. "Can Destination Cards Help to Shape Areas’ Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Nan Guo & Edwin Hon Wan Chan & Esther Hiu Kwan Yung, 2020. "Alternative Governance Model for Historical Building Conservation in China: From Property Rights Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Rocío Silva-Pérez & Gema González-Romero, 2022. "GIAHS as an Instrument to Articulate the Landscape and Territorialized Agrifood Systems—The Example of La Axarquía (Malaga Province, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Helai Huang & Jialing Wu & Fang Liu & Yiwei Wang, 2020. "Measuring Accessibility Based on Improved Impedance and Attractive Functions Using Taxi Trajectory Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    16. Ram, Yael & Gal-Tzur, Ayelet & Rechavi, Amit, 2021. "Identifying attributes of public transport services for urban tourists: A data-mining method," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    17. Yang, Nan & Shen, Liyin & Shu, Tianheng & Liao, Shiju & Peng, Yi & Wang, Jinhuan, 2021. "An integrative method for analyzing spatial accessibility in the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    18. Bangyu Liu & Ning Qiu & Tianjie Zhang, 2023. "Accessibility of Elderly Care Facilities Based on Social Stratification: A Case Study in Tianjin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, January.
    19. Yang Gao & Mengmeng Li & Qingning Li & Keji Huang & Shiwei Shen, 2022. "Inheritors’ Happiness and Its Relevant Factors in Intangible Cultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Ge Chen & Jiaying Shi & Yiping Xia & Katsunori Furuya, 2020. "The Sustainable Development of Urban Cultural Heritage Gardens Based on Tourists’ Perception: A Case Study of Tokyo’s Cultural Heritage Gardens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7525-:d:1139183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.